Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, modnar said:

MailNews 2024-10-12 also crashes as soon as I click on email in my inbox that has pictures attached to it.

Confirmed. The gkmedias.dll file (8.496.128 Bytes) is faulty. I replaced it by the previous gkmedias.dll file (8.623.104 Bytes), and the error is history. :P


Posted
11 minutes ago, AstroSkipper said:
1 hour ago, modnar said:

MailNews 2024-10-12 also crashes as soon as I click on email in my inbox that has pictures attached to it.

Confirmed. The gkmedias.dll file (8.496.128 Bytes) is faulty. I replaced it by the previous gkmedias.dll file (8.623.104 Bytes), and the error is history. :P

I can confirm the same problem in the most recent release of New Moon 28 (2024-10-11). I replaced gkmedias.dll file (9.862.144 Bytes) by the previous one (9.989.632 Bytes), and the error is history. :P

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, roytam1 said:

unfortunately I can't reproduce here.

maybe I would just revert that commit in next build.

I got a crash log with proper pdb file supplied in https://github.com/roytam1/basilisk55/issues/10#issuecomment-2408527740

so the problem is thread local storage introduced in https://github.com/libjpeg-turbo/libjpeg-turbo/commit/f579cc11b33e5bfeb9931e37cc74b4a33c95d2e6 , and I'm going to `#define THREAD_LOCAL ` to turn this off.

EDIT: alright all gkmedias.dll are replaced in today's release

Edited by roytam1
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, nicolaasjan said:

Random crashes on palemoon-28.10.7a1.win32-git-20241012. :(

Reverted to previous version ---> no issues.

I assume all your random crashes are related to the already reported gkmedias.dll issue. Right? :dubbio: If so, you can replace this file with the previous one without having to completely revert to the previous version of New Moon 28. I mention this as I have been testing the new release the last hours. After replacing the gkmedias.dll file, this new release of New Moon 28 seems to be working fine so far. :P

Edited by AstroSkipper
Update of content
Posted
3 hours ago, AstroSkipper said:

I assume all your random crashes are related to the already reported gkmedias.dll issue. Right?

That must be it .

I first experienced a crash on this very forum. :o

Roytam1 has uploaded new versions with gkmedias.dll replaced.

Now everything is OK again. :)

Posted (edited)
20 hours ago, roytam1 said:

thats something different which is filed in upstream: https://repo.palemoon.org/MoonchildProductions/UXP/issues/2645

In the NM28 versions for August 2022, video content on Youtube and VK is played without problems.

In 2018, on Google Chrome 48, with a lower connection speed, it was possible to watch 1440 videos without problems. Now the maximum is 1080 and with a slowdown due to the maximum load on the processor Athlon II X3 455 (3300 Hz, 3 cores).

 

image.jpg

Edited by Slavich
Posted (edited)
23 hours ago, AstroSkipper said:

For some time now, your swan song to the UXP era can be read in each of your posts here. :buehehe: Very inspiring and helpful. :rolleyes:

Does Rammstein's Adieu fit well when reading them?

I keep running into issues when slightly deviating from few select sites and it doesn't inspire positivity, even though I'm sure I'm one of the most positive people here when it comes to UXP. How many of you have financially contributed to development? I have, and it wasn't just a couple of bucks.

@Slavich
You should take that reading after YT's interface is fully loaded.

Edited by UCyborg
Posted (edited)
58 minutes ago, UCyborg said:

even though I'm sure I'm one of the most positive people here when it comes to UXP. How many of you have financially contributed to development? I have, and it wasn't just a couple of bucks.

:thumbup BTW, it wasn't meant offensive. It was just an observation I made when reading your comments. I'm someone who likes to say what I think, sometimes very directly. :P And as for Rammstein, I'm sorry to say that I've never been a fan. nimportequoi.gif

Edited by AstroSkipper
Update of content
Posted
50 minutes ago, UCyborg said:

@Slavich

 

You should take that reading after YT's interface is fully loaded.

When the page is fully loaded, the same thing happens. And on later versions of the NM28 as well.

image.jpg

Posted

I avoid the original YouTube interface as it has become useless for me the last years. :thumbdown I use instead the VORAPIS V3 script which is really great. I therefore no longer notice whether the original interface has become even worse. :buehehe:

Posted
1 hour ago, Slavich said:

When the page is fully loaded, the same thing happens. And on later versions of the NM28 as well....

I use it with Serpent 52.9; download Firefox addon h264ify (v1.1) it installs and works well in Serpent and Youtube works much better/normally again.

Posted
1 hour ago, AstroSkipper said:

I use instead the VORAPIS V3

<sarcasm font>Is this your swan song?</sarcasm font>  :roll1:

I did try your beloved VORAPIS V3 and there are some pros to it.  But there are also some cons.  I used it for about an hour and ditched it, reverting to my own "tools".  There is no "one size fits all" approach.  Sorry, there just isn't.


Here is what I'm seeing in NM28 "out-of-the-box".  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyhFQmSaf0g

image.thumb.png.37e158548eb1612a0b73232f13fb68ab.png

 

No issues here.  I'll try in a POS computer instead.

 

Posted (edited)

I hover around 46% with latest NM28 and my POS computer.

Not great.  But this is literally "out-of-the-box", fresh download, brand new profile.

image.thumb.png.2916f5b8d681f567eebf06c29f9a501c.png

 

Adding VORAPIS (I use the TurboLauncher script via Greasemonkey) is likely the best it gets for NM28 and real POS computers.

image.png.ca10d115abca1fb6760b6395cf5599f2.png

Edited by NotHereToPlayGames
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Slavich said:

When the page is fully loaded, the same thing happens. And on later versions of the NM28 as well.

Are you saying older versions of NM28 no longer get you the performance they used to? Also, is GPU acceleration working on your system? It's written on about:support page, should say Direct3D 9 in second row under Graphics in Windows XP if I recall correctly.

1 hour ago, NotHereToPlayGames said:

I did try your beloved VORAPIS V3 and there are some pros to it.  But there are also some cons.  I used it for about an hour and ditched it, reverting to my own "tools".  There is no "one size fits all" approach.  Sorry, there just isn't.

Well, it should be almost like old YouTube, though you said you didn't really use it in the old days.

Actually, for me at least, I almost don't miss any exclusive script for stock YT, except Simple YouTube Age Restriction Bypass. I don't "need" it often, but it's handy.

1 hour ago, NotHereToPlayGames said:

Adding VORAPIS (I use the TurboLauncher script via Greasemonkey) is likely the best it gets for NM28 and real POS computers.

While it's a good idea, I'd just like to add it wasn't formally released in that form that seems to actually work properly. Yes, the main script was released and available on https://vorapis.pages.dev/, but doesn't work properly as-is in Greasemonkey. They're planning the standalone extension, again, not formally released yet. Link to the post with the script again:

On an unrelated note, their (Project VORAPIS developers) primary communication channel is Discord. I don't "dig" Discord at all, it looks like a very messy medium for communication. It's completely unfit as a source for anything regarding a project like VORAPIS. Is that the level modern "gamers" have stomped down to? If they're even gamers, I just hear it's very popular among gamers.

Though we also have a giant thread for a bunch of web browsers here, which isn't a whole lot better either. But at least it's on a forum.

Edited by UCyborg
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, NotHereToPlayGames said:
3 hours ago, AstroSkipper said:

I use instead the VORAPIS V3

<sarcasm font>Is this your swan song?</sarcasm font> :lol:

I love the creativity of some people here. :rolleyes: BTW, your investigations of the VORAPIS V3 interface are strange. On my old and very weak Windows XP computer, the original YouTube interface is a real disaster. :thumbdown :realmad: It takes ages to load and only with tons of scripts, filters and extensions, it can be accessed but when scrolling the page a bit, the loading of unwanted crap starts again with a 100% CPU usage. In contrast, the VORAPIS V3 interface is loaded in less than a minute, and the usage of CPU and RAM is much, much less as it is with the original interface, even when scrolling the page a bit. So, no swan song but stating facts. :P

Edited by AstroSkipper

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...