ED_Sln Posted October 26, 2023 Posted October 26, 2023 10 hours ago, Milkinis said: No OCAPI crap here Where to find out how it was able to be launched?
D.Draker Posted October 26, 2023 Posted October 26, 2023 14 hours ago, Milkinis said: Hello ladies and gentlemen No OCAPI crap here Long life to WinXP till 2030 @NotHereToPlayGames cheers The browser on this photo is NOT the one which is discussed here. Which browser is that? Standard Chrome? 4
Dixel Posted October 26, 2023 Posted October 26, 2023 On 9/29/2023 at 9:05 AM, Dibya said: This is supermium running on Windows XP with OneCoreAPI, if @win32 blesses us with help to setup a build environment with our custom LLVM/Clang with thread_local support, we can port latest chromium with full source code. @user57 & Me will be lead developer in this project, but anyone is welcome. Yours doesn't look like Supermium, the UI is different, and the real Supermium says "Supermium", not "Chromium" or "Chrome". 4
roytam1 Posted October 27, 2023 Posted October 27, 2023 On 10/26/2023 at 7:42 PM, Dixel said: Yours doesn't look like Supermium, the UI is different, and the real Supermium says "Supermium", not "Chromium" or "Chrome". hmm? 2
Dixel Posted October 28, 2023 Posted October 28, 2023 On 10/27/2023 at 9:01 AM, roytam1 said: hmm? What does it have to do with UA? Compare the GUI, it's different, this one is indeed looks like the right one, and his picture doesn't. 4
Dixel Posted October 28, 2023 Posted October 28, 2023 On 10/27/2023 at 9:01 AM, roytam1 said: hmm? Besides, Supermium doesn't show the "suffer warning of no longer supported" about using it on XP/Vista. So his image is fake. 4
woi Posted October 29, 2023 Posted October 29, 2023 (edited) On 10/29/2023 at 12:42 AM, Dixel said: Besides, Supermium doesn't show the "suffer warning of no longer supported" about using it on XP/Vista. So his image is fake. This is how Supermium actually looks like on Windows XP with OCAPI (and with buggy GDI rendering enabled by using XP comp + --single-process). But Dibya accidentally used the wrong picture from OCAPI Github issues about someone managed to run crac_ked Chrome on XP. For those who wondering about any updates of @win32 porting Supermium to XP/Vista (without extended kernel), here's a screenshot (from win32ss): Works completely fine on Vista (without extended kernel) and extension and download works here, but XP is not finished yet (something has to be done). Edited February 16, 2024 by woi removed reference 2
Dixel Posted October 29, 2023 Posted October 29, 2023 6 hours ago, woi said: This is how Supermium actually looks like on Windows XP with OCAPI (and with buggy GDI rendering enabled by using XP comp + --single-process). But Dibya accidentally used the wrong picture from OCAPI Github issues about someone managed to run Blaukovitch's Chrome on XP (with OCAPI of course). Reveal hidden contents For those who wondering about any updates of @win32 porting Supermium to XP/Vista (without extended kernel), here's a screenshot (from win32ss): Works completely fine on Vista (without extended kernel) and extension and download works here, but XP is not finished yet (something has to be done). Yes, indeed! @Dave-H, could you please block/remove those misleading posts with fake images, thanks you. Those are not related to Supermium at all. And the posters refuse to answer. https://msfn.org/board/topic/185045-supermium/?do=findComment&comment=1252527 https://msfn.org/board/topic/185045-supermium/?do=findComment&comment=1254569 7
MWF Posted October 31, 2023 Posted October 31, 2023 On 10/28/2023 at 7:04 PM, woi said: This is how Supermium actually looks like on Windows XP with OCAPI (and with buggy GDI rendering enabled by using XP comp + --single-process). But Dibya accidentally used the wrong picture from OCAPI Github issues about someone managed to run Blaukovitch's Chrome on XP (with OCAPI of course). Reveal hidden contents For those who wondering about any updates of @win32 porting Supermium to XP/Vista (without extended kernel), here's a screenshot (from win32ss): Works completely fine on Vista (without extended kernel) and extension and download works here, but XP is not finished yet (something has to be done). this is correct
mina7601 Posted November 9, 2023 Posted November 9, 2023 On 10/22/2023 at 8:13 AM, ED_Sln said: Now extensions are installed, but files are still not downloaded. No extensions work to intercept or replace the download. I installed Download Master (Internet Download Accelerator) and enabled the interception of links from the clipboard in it, now if you copy the link, it will be automatically added to the download. One Core API 3.0.3 solved the file downloading issue as well! As an example, I was able to download 7-Zip's installer without any problems: 1
MWF Posted November 9, 2023 Posted November 9, 2023 1 hour ago, mina7601 said: One Core API 3.0.3 solved the file downloading issue as well! As an example, I was able to download 7-Zip's installer without any problems: yea, but still issues with real hardware, still suffer with bsod, still have error on paint.net
mina7601 Posted November 9, 2023 Posted November 9, 2023 (edited) 21 hours ago, MWF said: yea, but still issues with real hardware, still suffer with bsod, still have error on paint.net Yes, but here in this topic, I talk about how stable and usable Supermium is in XP with One Core API installed. Edited November 9, 2023 by mina7601 1
MWF Posted November 9, 2023 Posted November 9, 2023 18 minutes ago, mina7601 said: Yes, but here in this topic, I talk about how stable and usable Supermium is in XP with One Core API installed. i mean if want to try then go ahead, but keep that mind it might experience issues on real hardware compared to vm
NotHereToPlayGames Posted November 9, 2023 Posted November 9, 2023 On 10/25/2023 at 2:38 PM, Milkinis said: No OCAPI crap here 19 minutes ago, mina7601 said: Yes, but here in this topic, I talk about how stable and usable Supermium is in XP with One Core API installed. Not one of my daily thread-reads, but I finally now know what OCAPI crap was in reference to.
seven4ever Posted November 10, 2023 Posted November 10, 2023 (edited) If the target is to have an up to date Web Browser on an old machine, simply install Linux on it and you can install the updated one of your choice.. I don't want to have a Frankenstein OS (It's a Debian terminology) , call it One Core Api over Xp if you want, but nobody talk about compatibility with others programms and it seems not compatible with real hardware Edited November 10, 2023 by seven4ever
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now