Jump to content
MSFN is made available via donations, subscriptions and advertising revenue. The use of ad-blocking software hurts the site. Please disable ad-blocking software or set an exception for MSFN. ×

Dixel

Member
  • Posts

    539
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    32
  • Donations

    $0.00 
  • Country

    Netherlands

Dixel last won the day on July 14

Dixel had the most liked content!

1 Follower

About Dixel

Profile Information

  • OS
    Vista Ultimate x64

Recent Profile Visitors

3,261 profile views

Dixel's Achievements

370

Reputation

  1. @Gansangriff , perhaps if you have some spare time , would you test this @ArcticFoxie's latest (final?) modded version of 360 explorer v.13.2206 with your advanced methods of testing to see if there are such connections also ? Thank you ! https://msfn.org/board/topic/182304-extreme-explorer-360-chromium-78-86-general-discussion/page/57/?tab=comments#comment-1202777
  2. I also encountered a warning by Vista's firewall asking me if I want to block an incoming connection to 360chrome executable file , with v12. I want to note that I have another firewall installed (which is considered to be good) , but it didn't notice anything strange (!) , though it has almost paranoid level of settings. Vista's firewall is good ? I think so, yes. I knew about 360's incoming connections for a long time. I warned about this a long time ago , which could be found at my profile . I just thought they had disabled them already , but it seems no, they are still here.
  3. Like you ordered , with proof . I decided to bash them with something more sophisticated. It is not easy , to fake an iPhone agent , you will need to write a programme for this. I've succesfuly blocked the vendor string detection by UA ! UA wasn't able to collect any hints about my real vendor . Now you can try to use any iPhone useragent for yourself or use the one below . Choose an iPhone useragent with your extension and try https://html5test.com/ . It will still detect that your cheating. Oh , and I'm just really curious , you see , I do upvote your posts , will you upvote mine , cause it really shines and it's a huge breakthrough in terms of privacy . No ? How so ? Something personal ? Agents for this testing taken from here . https://whatmyuseragent.com/browser/mf/mobile-safari/14 Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 14_4 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/14.0 Mobile/15E148 Safari/604.1 Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 14_6 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/14.0 Mobile/15E148 Safari/605.1.15 Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 14_6 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/14.0 Mobile/15E148 Safari/604.1 Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 14_5_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/14.5 Mobile/15E148 Safari/605.1.15 Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 14_5_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/14.0 Mobile/15E148 Safari/605.1.15 Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 14_5_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/14.0 Mobile/15E148 Safari/604.1 Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 14_5 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/14.1 Mobile/15E148 Safari/604.1 Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 14_5 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/14.0 Mobile/15E148 Safari/605.1.15
  4. 1 - I don't know anything about v13. on "later OS" . The latest for me is Vista x64 and it doesn't have any problems , like I said . Perhaps it's because you're using another version ? Try 1106 "beta", it's good . 2- And what environment would that be ? (specs , OS) What do you mean by "newer OS" , is it Vista and up ? I'm sorry I thought you're on XP , right ? 3- Did you or did you not try to install that cert. pack . I remember I started to get cert. errors somewhere around May 2021 . I installed his pack (without SHA-2 updates) and all problems just vanished . I can't replicate your issues with any on these versions on Vista x64 , sorry. About youtbue , try to change your UA , perhaps your slownees is due to numerous scripts and bloat coming from youtube ? Do you have a good adblocker ? Try using mobile user agent from iphone , maybe ? Youtube will load less scripts/bloat if you're on iphone. Other things to consider , try using 344.xx or 347.xx drivers if you're on GTX.
  5. Yeah , all the best , but we'll miss you . Though , It's a good thing to take a break from online activities . Stay well !
  6. 1 -- Yes , you seem to be confused on what UA-CH does , and what it does is : it will use any hints it can get to identify a user and make his fingerprint , hence the name with this key-word "hints". 2 - No , it's not a direct bypass . "the origin needs to gather as much entropy as possible, so it is likely to collect all the hints." Paragraph 1.2.9. "Fingerprinting". It will also try to identify your system with "'Sec-CH-UA-Platform-Version' Header Field" / Paragraph 3.8 https://wicg.github.io/ua-client-hints/ 3 - No , if you used countermeasures , like me. I could tell you many secrets , but like I said earlier , I'm not willing to broadcast them in the open . One secret I can share , how it detects you and with what (4). 4 - No , it detected you by the means of the vendor string : UA collected the hint that your vendor is Gugle, so now it compares it with your fake FF useragent and "sees" that something's wrong . Firefox string and "vendor" Gugle together, it's just not possible ! So you need to block the detection of this "vendor" string. It is NOT easy , you will need to write a programme for this. 5 - ENOUGH with labeling and classifications ! You wouldn't last long with a talk like that here , in Europe. Keep your "opinion" to yourself , OK ? I do not need it . I asked you to quit talking about my personality a million times . But if that gives you such a huge pleasure , go on . I guess it is still better than bashing your neighbours with a baseball bat , lol. 6 - Sounds like a sweet tale from a rich Californian corporate leftist. Smth like "we work for your safety". No , it will brodcast even it's switched off. "the Sec-CH-UA header will be sent by default, whether or not the server opted-into receiving the header via an Accept-CH header" .... 7 - https://wicg.github.io/ua-client-hints/ 8 - Yes, it does . It detected that you're cheating. And you will see in that article that it is still on , it will brodcast everything it can find. The Tale About The Version : I asked you if you trust Gugle , if you do , then you will also trust that it was available only starting from 84 , lol. ...
  7. @XPerceniol , yes , I already told you . I'll give it to you , in fact it's been prepared already . Just shoot me a message .< I'll reply. @ArcticFoxie , give me a chance to reply ! You're bombarding me with questions, I'm sorry , I have a job and/or personal needs , like sleeping. I understand you have lots of energy and plenty of free time , lol. I'll answer later. Thanks for the attention.
  8. Well , maybe only in theory. But let's do some real checking . You say it's not enabled by default ? You trust Gugle docs/papers ? (I'm not calling you any names , like you said earlier , just to make clear !) . This is only a simple question . Again , do you trust them ? Please do the following : Do not block java scripts (only for this test) , now change your UA to Firefox or any firefox-based browser , go here https://html5test.com/ and the website will show that you're cheating ! It will say something like : "You are using an unknown browser that imitates Firefox " . Where "unknown browser" would the real UA of our dear 360EE. And it is really unknown to the most websites ! How would you explain this ?
  9. 1 - I do not consider myself paranoic on any level . It's just a big pack of precautions . You're very welcome not to follow them (this is one of the reasons I shan't share my version). 2 - Gugle bot is reading, sending and indexing , yes. 3 - No , of course not . GPS is disabled with a soldering iron . (the newer phones have them , even basic phones with buttons) 4 - I do not know why , I'm still trying to find an explanation , maybe it's the lack of the manners or maybe it's because we are from absolutely different countries , but some of your posts do sound extremely rude , like really-really rude , it's like in the movies , when it's time to go out of the bar to get some fresh air, lol .
  10. UA hints works starting from chrome 85 (so v.13 is the first to include it) . What is this ? It is a new API which sends you real User Agent ! So you won't fool gurgle/youtbue and other corporations that are willing to know everything about you . It was implemented to restrict usage of UA spoofing extensions/flags/switches . I'm kinda the first to talk about it here . What am I afraid of ? I think we shouldn't write every thing we disable in the open , they know how to read too , you know ! I have like a ton of countermeasures in my version already . And not wanting them to know what exactly I was able to remove/disable , the most important is how and where exactly.
  11. Well , thank you . But it seems some folks can't live without emojis and other things (like first start and web-gl) so it will be very hard to have an agreement where everyone here is satisfied . But I can share my version with you , if you want , just shoot me a message. It is kinda heavily axed , brutally . But it has English errors which I'm too lazy/busy to fix. This would definitely annoy some certain members , so I won't publish it in the open.
  12. Wouldn't it easier to use "no first run" flag ? Perhaps it will help with your gstatic connections. Do not get mad at me , it's just a suggestion.
  13. 1 - No emojis are due to the browser's blocking remote fonts (which is a nice thing) . They are trying to make a privacy-oriented browser , you know . I did a 13th version for myself from scratch and I too blocked it. Also, blocked web-gl , web-rtc and other numerous things like UA-hints , for example. ( a very nasty thing !) 2- I use a very dated PC for the internet . CPU is from 2008 (quad) ! (soon to be 14 years old!) . And I do not see any lags , even though hardware acceleration is blocked completely due to disabled fingerprinting. Perhaps it has something to do with XP ? (I gather you're on XP , right ?) 3 - Problem with certificates can be solved with a cert. pack by @legacyfan , it includes the .bat . You do not even need SHA-2. But I'm afraid it could be deleted already . Check his account.
  14. People are tired of this , we now have a joke (quite popular , esp. in the rural areas) . I shan't (can't) tell it , but it's key word is "televirus". It's like when the most of us wouldn't even know about it's existence , if not for the TV/Internet. People are starting to realize this is about control (tracking soft, for example) and not about the "virus" per-se. We don't have extreme measures , but when our folks watch TV , they start to ask questions like " if this virus is so lethal , where are the piles of corpses to justify the extreme measures in the other countries ?" ? Like in the films , you know . Back here , we are very well prepared to meet any threat . When this all started , some locals were wearing gas-masks , lol. We have marvellous Dutch , Belgian and German NATO gas masks for cheap . The British/US ones are for free , but no one needs/likes them . In the rural areas , we still have huge and strong young men who (how to put this polite) , let's say the ones you don't wanna drive mad or even get angry . I'm sure most of you know , our country is famous for it's extremely beatiful Gothic architecture , beautiful women (Doutzen Kroes) , wide range of superior goods , technological advancements and ..... the deadliest mercenaries , lol . Also , we are only "advised" , not "required" and definitely not "forced" to use vaccines or any type of software, not like some other countries. P.S. I personally do not know anyone who was sick with it .
  15. It only supposed to work if you have "vulkan" software on your PC . Any 360 users have Vulkan installed ? Do any of you use this "vulkan" ? Do any of you even know what that is ? If no, I'd describe it as yet another bloatware (my persoonal opinion , perhaps someone likes it , I dunno , so no offence ) . It is usually bundled with Nvidia drivers among other bloatware in the driver package and it is installed without your consent . This is one the bad omens , usually pointing out to malware/adware/spyware. "NOTE: SwiftShader's OpenGL ES frontend is no longer supported, and will eventually be removed. " If you want to read more : https://github.com/google/swiftshader

×
×
  • Create New...