Everything posted by D.Draker
-
The actual reason Windows 11 failed
Thanks. No, I have lots and lots of different hardware. Windows 7 sound is the worst, sandy, Win 8 is soooo soft, like Sony HiFi audio (if you remember the late 70s-80s, of course, you'll understand). XP isn't far away from 7, a bit punchier, but also over-bassy and flat (poor surround), like they smash you straight in the face. But if you listen to CDs with their 16bit primitivism and over-loaded, highly compressed to the "brick wall" audio, which totally suck in the first place, probably you won't notice. Edit: Read about loudness wars, and even if a CD is properly mastered, 16bit is still not enough. It's 60s tech.
- Firefox and Chromium working on Older Windows by e3kskoy7wqk.
- Firefox and Chromium working on Older Windows by e3kskoy7wqk.
- Firefox and Chromium working on Older Windows by e3kskoy7wqk.
-
The actual reason Windows 11 failed
I used the drivers that came with the Xonar CD (which contained both Xp and Vista), but obviously not 11, hence I don't know and can't make judgements about 11. At that time, I had just D1, but later upgraded to the more advanced Xonar D2, The sound on Vista was fantastic, on XP and 7, very similar to what we were listening in the 80's terrible cassette walkmans. or similar to the garbage mp3. On Vista, I always choose 192Khz, of course not 44, and 44 is more like for partially deaf people, the ones who have nothing to lose in the terms of quality anyways. I served in the artillery, my hearing is damaged, and even I hear the clear difference in favour of Vista.
- Firefox and Chromium working on Older Windows by e3kskoy7wqk.
-
Chrome on Windows 8.1
So the last (real) kernel release was in 2022, I knew something fishy was going on, thanks for the warning!
-
Geforce GT 710 cards under Windows XP, Findings
Found it! This driver worked for that member, I don't remember, probably, and most likely I gave it. https://drivers.softpedia.com/get/GRAPHICS-BOARD/NVIDIA/NVIDIA-GeForce-iCafe-Graphics-Driver-35573-for-XP.shtml
-
Firefox and Chromium working on Older Windows by e3kskoy7wqk.
Also, shell32.dll, is not needed at all? SHGetPropertyStoreForWindow replace with SHGetStockIconInfo, should be all. I wrote about it before. Basically, all others can be replaced too, but in kernel32 you would have to re-implement the function which gets the info about your locale (or extensions won't work). I could care less because I use the one and only English GB. But other languages, including the US dialect will fail to load, and you will see empty strings.
- Firefox and Chromium working on Older Windows by e3kskoy7wqk.
- Firefox and Chromium working on Older Windows by e3kskoy7wqk.
-
Geforce GT 710 cards under Windows XP, Findings
Mark, but this screenshot is from 344, not 347 I gave you earlier, I remembered, we had a user@UCyborg with an identical card, and it had no problems with XP. I'll try to find the driver that worked for that user. Hold on.
- The wretched Chrome Client Hints, another Doomsday of privacy: ways out of it.
-
Amd rx 6000 series compatible with 8.1?
Make a dedicated topic to help you diagnose the trouble.
-
Geforce GT 710 cards under Windows XP, Findings
@Mark-XP, did my 347 driver suggestion help? Need further assistance?
-
The wretched Chrome Client Hints, another Doomsday of privacy: ways out of it.
Blaukovitch inserts a unique identifier to its ported Chrome. What for? What Russia structures Blaukovitch really works for? Blaukovitch had removed the standard X-Client-Data filed on HTML response header form and changed to F**KYOUGOOGLE X-Client-Data, what it is. https://gigazine.net/gsc_news/en/20200205-google-chrome-x-client-data/ More info on the matter. "When a browser wishes to fetch a web page from a server, it sends an HTTP request for that page, a request that contains a set of headers, which are key-value pairs separated by colons. These headers describe data relevant to the request. For example, sending the header accept: text/html tells the browser what media types it will accept. For years, since 2012 at least, Chrome has sent a header called X-client-data, formerly known as X-chrome-variations" https://www.theregister.com/2020/02/05/google_chrome_id_numbers/
-
The wretched Chrome Client Hints, another Doomsday of privacy: ways out of it.
To prove my point even further, a standard Android or iOS phone already includes the precise model in its UA. What else do they need!?!??! Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 13; SAMSUNG SM-A536B) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) SamsungBrowser/21.0 Chrome/110.0.5481.154 Mobile Safari/537.3 https://deviceatlas.com/blog/samsung-phones-user-agent-strings-list Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 15_1_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/15.1 Mobile/15E148 Safari/605.1 NAVER(inapp; search; 1000; 11.8.10; 12PROMAX) https://whatmyuseragent.com/platforms/ios/ios/15
-
explorer7 - Windows 7 explorer for Windows 8.1/10/11
How do I replace the white field with the iconic Feldrau colour? On Windows 7 or 8 without the Stuff Pck 1. Thanks!
-
The actual reason Windows 11 failed
A very good idea, but what to do with XP sound quality, which will still remain awful, cheaply sounding resampled 48Khz, very similar to mp3 128kb? No matter how many pro grade sound cards I tried, all was terrible until NT6.0, and then got downhill with the release of Windows 7, going further donm with 8 and 10. How's the sound in 11? My cards have no drivers for 11.
-
Chrome on Windows 8.1
If it fails, don't give up, try NtCreateKey. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/ddi/wdm/nf-wdm-zwcreatekey
-
What’s the best program for parental controls?
You're very welcome! Let us know the result, what finally worked for you. Thanks.
-
Chrome on Windows 8.1
For lower OS in SHELL32 SHGetPropertyStoreForWindow replace with SHGetStockIconInfo
-
Chrome on Windows 8.1
In NTDLL NtOpenKeyEx needs to replaced with just NtOpenKey, it's even safer this way, why would they need the extended variant!?!
-
Chrome on Windows 8.1
My trust in you has no bounds, I had no doubts you would find.
-
Chrome on Windows 8.1
Yes, I saw, but with the already ported version 136 we could do just fine for about two years, as you see, Thorium and Supermium only started to completely fail after two years from the initial version 111 (which in my humble opinion they are based on). My PC also sucks by the modern day standards, its CPU is very similar to the severely outdated CPU used by NotHereToPlayGames.