D.Draker

But then again, might too be problematic. https://www.reddit.com/r/graphicscard/comments/nw289k/any_graphics_card_that_supports_win_10_ltsb_2015/

Any GPU path you choose these days will be bad, but I agree, RX6000 over RTX3000 has much nicer colours. For me, 8.1 and 10 are equally evil, maybe try 2015 LBSB, LSGT or whatever it's called, then.

Most of us don't. If you have some time, probably make a list of the garbage files? like I did here. https://msfn.org/board/topic/186741-firefox-and-chromium-running-on-windows-7-by-e3kskskoy7wqk/page/2/#findComment-1278902

Also seems like a piece of junk. Replace with an empty file with the same extension. (from TXT file)

Glad to help. Why do you need this garbage? Replace with an empty file with the same extension. crashreporter.exe (from TXT file)

I'd try to blindly replace it with anything and everything containing CPU "affinity". https://documentation.ubuntu.com/real-time/en/latest/tutorial/5-cpu-affinity/

Exactly, that's why I explained that using the suggested PAE is problematic, even with common drivers, therefore not advisable for a casual user due to the dubious fixes. And let's not forget, those who read the forum without being the members. Most of the articles with numerous errors from users attempting to use PAE on higher than XP SP1 are now gone. I tried it myself, and nVidia drivers acted up to the point of the whole OS being unstable, because consumer drivers are written that way, they are meant to handle the standard 32bit OS RAM configs only.

No, this is "your side" of this BS Debate! You can't see past the veil you've pulled over your own eyes. Learn how to read GitHub changelogs. Supermium v126 is based off of Chromium v126. Supermium v132 is based off of Chromium v132. TO CLAIM ANYTHING OTHERWISE ONLY REVEALS ONE DOESN'T KNOW HOW TO READ GITHUB "COMMITS". CSS? Show us! Member, do I really need to report you? Your profile now 99% consists of your favourite "BS" words.

Sorry, don't know, but's is faster than Thorium with SSE4.x/AVX anyways, and 12 versions (1) year newer. Not to mention, I highly doubt Thorium was a real 122 version to begin with.

Another good idea is to remove the portion of the code which creates BrowserMetrics-xxxxxxxx-xxxxx.pma in the BrowserMetrics folder and BrowserMetrics-spare.pma in the data folder. I suggested several years ago. https://msfn.org/board/topic/184046-future-of-chrome-on-windows-7/page/38/#findComment-1245198

Why do you give me this? I already wrote, the guy's suggested fix is dubious, alleged. The whole point is what I wrote is to try to explain why XP fans refuse to acknowledge PAE.

What year is this from? Fujitsu Office level desktops already had 4x4 DDR3 (16g) 1333Mhz in 2009, and it was kinda normal almost 2 decades ago.

Win32ss finally confessed. But no apologies for not telling the public before. "... the most important of the sandboxes, so there will be further work to be done there." https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/1292#issuecomment-2770908088

Xonar drivers also glitch out,

For example, problems with PAE support. https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/forums/game-ready-drivers/13/14719/pae-support-in-nvidia-drivers-i-have-problems-with/ Alleged fix. "Try the boot option /USERVA=2800 to make sure that there's still enough mappable memory for the card itself. My startoption line looks like this:" /NOEXECUTE=OPTIN /FASTDETECT /3GB /USERVA=2800 /PAE

Why won't you tell us about the well known, famous problems with drivers, Nvidia and Intel for example, which will arise from using PAE?

Well, I don't think 6450 is that much more powerful, those both are bottom feeders. What is the memory type on your 210? If it's DDR3, it's not that slower. Raw Performance comparison Pixel Rate GeForce 210 2.08 GP/s Radeon HD 6450 2.50 GP/s GigaPixels - higher is better Texel Rate GeForce 210 4.16 GT/s Radeon HD 6450 5.00 GT/s GigaTexels - higher is better https://hwbench.com/vgas/geforce-210-vs-radeon-hd-6450

I once had 6510, the lowest I could get it to work with was XP64 bit (without SP!). In general, ATI/AMD are very fast to drop old OS, so you'd have more success with Nvidia.

Thanks, it doesn't disable the API, I already tried it before. This non-working flag is a gift from @VistaLover. From the times he was trying to make Supermium somewhat usable. Supermium BROKEN "ClientHints API Removal" implementation #838 Source: https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/838

I mean that it's always advisable to flash BIOS verified by the techpowerup team! People can get a problem with their card by flashing a BIOS not verified by the techpowerup team.

Thank you very much for the testings! What happens if you just click on "log in"? Supermium gets an error, as they wrote.

Member, you provided no source to backup your false claim regarding this. No cited article tells that flag disables UDP casting. Besides, it's NOT official, it's some dude over the internet, and even he never wrote what you falsely claimed. We already had a similar user which is now called "Guest". Let's focus on this.

I used GTX780 (made in 2013, the First revision) with XP, and it was 3GB, so not a VRAM problem. It got very bad with 6GB cards, it artificially limited the memory to 1 and smth GB! So don't use more than 3GB cards with XP, just a waste of resources, but they will boot up and work.

344.75 driver might be too old for rev2.0. All my life, I had troubles with anything marked as 2.0, did you try the driver 347.26? https://drivers.softpedia.com/get/GRAPHICS-BOARD/NVIDIA/NVIDIA-GeForce-iCafe-Graphics-Driver-34726-for-XP.shtml

You provided with a wrong link to the BIOS, scroll to the bottom, it says v1.0, and it's NOT verified by the techpowerup team! People will brick their card.