Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 05/01/2024 in all areas
-
Wow! Is this thread here about hardware? And performance comparisons between Win XP and Win 10? The answer is crystal clear: Definitely not! This thread should actually provide information about the Thorium browser. Thus, the last 7 posts are therefore completely off-topic. The reader will not learn anything worth knowing about Thorium here. No matter how you feel about this browser.4 points
-
... Over the course of several previous years, "we" (UXP-users) have witnessed how the platform, in agony, struggled to cope with whatever new Javascript "feature" Google devs came up with, the most notorious of them being the non-polyfillable "operators" ("?.", "??"; read this excellent write-up by @InterLinked); at the time, I was semi-convinced that JS operators such as those would deal the final blow to UXP; thankfully, some talented UXP coders came up with own implementations of these operators, thus UXP was "saved" - but for how long? I'll have to side with NHTPG and, to a good extent, AstroSkipper that the last nail on UXP's coffin will be a "new" CSS-related "improvement" (sprinkle with a generous dose of sarcasm here ), implemented in a mixture of CSS code inside/alongside JS code (which seems to be the trend recently ); in the case of UXP, MCP's upstream (Mozilla) have CSS features implemented in Servo/Rust, so MCP can't backport easily, if at all, Mozilla code for these and get away with it; CSS-related UXP issues will keep piling up inside their tracker, with very dim prospect ... Case in point is a CSS bug that has been affecting GitHub in particular for many months now, it was acknowledged exactly one year ago, but so far no activity at all towards a resolution ... This particular "feature" was implemented only in Chromium 99, so it does "invalidate" the popular 360EEv13 and/or KafanMiniBrowser variants on XP/Vista x86; only implemented in Firefox 97, thus putting Mypal68 out of the game, too; if it weren't for the new "additions" (Supermium and its semi-fork Thorium) that appeared at a most opportune time , "we" retro-OS-ers (I just devised this term, ) would have run out of options...2 points
-
Knocking on UDP, trying to make connections via QUIC, broadcasting to literally everything and everyone is the default chrome behaviour. The question is, why (if both @win32 and Alexi are trying to implement at least something similar to Ungoogled) didn't cut it out first. Seems like a very logical (and rather simple) first step.2 points
-
@dimo70 You can't disable defender while the system is still running, it does protect it self.2 points
-
2 points
-
No sure if you still can disable defender online. This should work from WinPE/WinRE. Another Windows would need to run it with TrustedInstaller rights. Defender.cmd reg load HKLM\SOFT C:\Windows\System32\config\software reg load HKLM\SYS C:\Windows\System32\config\system reg import Defender.reg reg unload HKLM\SOFT reg unload HKLM\SYS Defender.reg Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFT\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run] "SecurityHealth"=- [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFT\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer] "SmartScreenEnabled"="Off" [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFT\Microsoft\Windows Defender] "DisableAntiSpyware"=dword:00000001 "DisableAntiVirus"=dword:00000001 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFT\Microsoft\Windows Defender\Features] "TamperProtection"=dword:00000000 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFT\Microsoft\Windows Defender\Real-Time Protection] "DisableRealtimeMonitoring"=dword:00000001 "DisableAntiSpywareRealtimeProtection"=dword:00000001 "DpaDisabled"=dword:00000001 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFT\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Image File Execution Options\MpCmdRun.exe] "Debugger"="NUL" [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFT\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Image File Execution Options\MsMpEng.exe] "Debugger"="NUL" [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFT\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Image File Execution Options\smartscreen.exe] "Debugger"="NUL" [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFT\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\System] "EnableSmartScreen"=dword:00000000 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFT\Policies\Microsoft\Windows Defender] "DisableAntiSpyware"=dword:00000001 "DisableAntiVirus"=dword:00000001 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFT\Policies\Microsoft\Windows Defender\SmartScreen] "ConfigureAppInstallControlEnabled"=dword:00000001 "ConfigureAppInstallControl"=dword:00000001 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYS\ControlSet001\Control\CI\Policy] "VerifiedAndReputablePolicyState"=dword:00000000 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYS\ControlSet001\Services\SecurityHealthService] "Start"=dword:00000000 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYS\ControlSet001\Services\WinDefend] "Start"=dword:00000004 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\MRT] "DontOfferThroughWUAU"=dword:00000001 P.S: Not sure why I set SecurityHealthService to autostart, either there was a problem with disabling or it's a typo.2 points
-
When uBlock Origin is installed, it controls the preloading of websites. You do not have to disable uBlock Origin to control this feature again, you can simply enable the option "Disable pre-fetching" in uBO's dashboard page "Settings" as already mentioned by @Dixel.2 points
-
Forgot say, the laptop is from 2013, based on Haswell Pentium mobile 3550M. https://ark.intel.com/products/774042 points
-
So I got some time today, I tried the driver, I had to add my device inf., it installed fine, but gives error 43 code.2 points
-
It doesn't work that way, here we respect intellectual property, even though we understand most of it belongs to another man (win32), despite all of the above, there needs to be a clear statement with Open Source code published by the author, none of that happened, so far.2 points
-
Why not release a better optimised product together, then? One million releases with constant fixes only confuses people. And what does he mean by "legacy" Thorium repo? It's also confusing since Windows 7,8,8.1 are all legacy, too.2 points
-
Please provide with a link where the author clearly states his softwaie is Open Source, and he (she?they?, if they work as a team) doesn't/don't mind it gets redistributed/modified.2 points
-
They claim this issue is now fixed, could you confirm? And it's again fixed by @win32, not "Thorium" author. https://github.com/Alex313031/thorium-legacy/releases/tag/M122.0.6261.169 "GDI text rendering alignment is fixed This bug caused text to be askew, either too high or too low, or too much to the left. The reason previous releases didn't have this fixed, is that win32ss fixed it in Skia, which is a third_party submodule of Chromium."2 points
-
2 points
-
2 points
-
2 points
-
2 points
-
Back in Action & Reupload it. https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0BxP1VJf8kaXobWZmc3ZlNkZMVWM?usp=sharing ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hello, have modded the Nvidia Driver Packages 81.85, 82.69 and 93.71 . These Driver supports Geforce 6/7 and 8 series AGP/PCI-Express devices for Windows98SE/ME. Hope the drivers will work fine for all. For addional information read the Readme.txt. UPDATE: 12-05-2007 Repack NVIDIA Installer! Fixed frequency table! Added NVTweaks! Fully Support of AGP Graphic Devices Experimental Support of Geforce 8 series! Link: UP AGAIN! http://rapidshare.com/files/30969815/GF678_98ME.exe12-05-2007_23.32 Update: Added an Picture: Geforce 7600GT is found as GF73 Chip! BUT: Use at your own risk! NV Control Panel will not correctly dectected GF 7/8, but the it will be albe to detect the Chip revision ================================================================= NVIDIA Chip Detection ================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------- AGP-Series; Will be detected by the NV Control Panel ----------------------------------------------------------------- NV40 = NVIDIA GeForce 6800 Ultra NV40 = NVIDIA GeForce 6800 NV40 = NVIDIA GeForce 6800 LE NV40 = NVIDIA GeForce 6800 XE NV40 = NVIDIA GeForce 6800 XT NV40 = NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GT NV40 = NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GS NV40 = NVIDIA GeForce 6800 XT NV40 = NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 NV41 = NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GS NV41 = NVIDIA GeForce 6800 NV41 = NVIDIA GeForce 6800 LE NV41 = NVIDIA GeForce 6800 XT NV41 = NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450/4000 SDI NV41 = NVIDIA Quadro FX 1400 NV43 = NVIDIA GeForce 6600 GT NV43 = NVIDIA GeForce 6600 NV43 = NVIDIA GeForce 6600 LE NV43 = NVIDIA GeForce 6600 VE NV43 = NVIDIA GeForce 6610 XL NV43 = NVIDIA GeForce 6700 XL NV43 = NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 NV43 = NVIDIA Quadro FX 550 NV43 = NVIDIA Quadro FX 540 NV43 = NVIDIA GeForce 6200 NV44 = NVIDIA GeForce 6500 NV44 = NVIDIA GeForce 6200 TurboCache(tm) NV44 = NVIDIA GeForce 6200SE TurboCache(tm) NV44 = NVIDIA GeForce 6200 LE NV44 = NVIDIA Quadro NVS 285 NV44 = NVIDIA GeForce 6200 NV44 = NVIDIA GeForce 6200 A-LE ----------------------------------------------------------------- PCI-E Series; NV Control Panel will only detect the Chip Revision ----------------------------------------------------------------- G70 = NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GTX G70 = NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GTX G70 = NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GT G70 = NVIDIA Quadro FX 4500 G71 = NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GTX G71 = NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GT/GTO G71 = NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GS G71 = NVIDIA GeForce 7950 GX2 G71 = NVIDIA GeForce 7950 GX2 G71 = NVIDIA GeForce 7950 GT G71 = NVIDIA Quadro FX 5500 G71 = NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500 G71 = NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500 G71 = NVIDIA Quadro FX 4500 X2 G72 = NVIDIA GeForce 7300 LE G72 = NVIDIA GeForce 7300 SE G72 = NVIDIA GeForce 7500 LE G72 = NVIDIA Quadro FX 350 G72 = NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GS G73 = NVIDIA GeForce 7650 GS G73 = NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GT G73 = NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GS G73 = NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GT G73 = NVIDIA GeForce 7600 LE G73 = NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GT G73 = NVIDIA Quadro FX 560 ----------------------------------------------------------------- AGP-Series; Will be detected by the NV Control Panel ----------------------------------------------------------------- NV48 = NVIDIA GeForce 6800 NV48 = NVIDIA GeForce 6800 LE NV48 = NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GT NV48 = NVIDIA GeForce 6800 XT ----------------------------------------------------------------- Onboard-Series; Will be detected by the NV Control Panel ----------------------------------------------------------------- C51 = NVIDIA GeForce 6150 C51 = NVIDIA GeForce 6150 LE C51 = NVIDIA GeForce 6100 C51 = NVIDIA Quadro NVS 210S / NVIDIA GeForce 6150LE C61 = NVIDIA GeForce 6100 nForce 430 C61 = NVIDIA GeForce 6100 nForce 405 C61 = NVIDIA GeForce 6100 nForce 400 C61 = NVIDIA GeForce 6100 nForce 420 ----------------------------------------------------------------- PCI-E Series; Will be detected by the NV Control Panel ----------------------------------------------------------------- BR02 = NVIDIA GeForce 6600 GT BR02 = NVIDIA GeForce 6600 BR02 = NVIDIA GeForce 6200 BR02 = NVIDIA GeForce 6600 LE BR02 = NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GS BR02 = NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GS/XT BR02 = NVIDIA Quadro FX 3400/4400 BR02 = NVIDIA GeForce 6800 Series GPU BR02 = NVIDIA GeForce PCX 5750 BR02 = NVIDIA GeForce PCX 5900 BR02 = NVIDIA GeForce PCX 5300 BR02 = NVIDIA Quadro PCI-E Series BR02 = NVIDIA Quadro FX 1300 ----------------------------------------------------------------- PCI-E Series; NV Control Panel will only detect the Chip Revision ----------------------------------------------------------------- G80 = NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX G80 = NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS G80 = NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra G84 = NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS G84 = NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT G86 = NVIDIA GeForce 8500 GT G86 = NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS G86 = NVIDIA GeForce 8300 GS ----------------------------------------------------------------- Can or Cant; Think 7xxx will be dectected as 6xxx - dont know ----------------------------------------------------------------- BR02 = NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GT BR02 = NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GS BR02 = NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GT NV44 = NVIDIA GeForce 7100 GS Feedback me please your experience .. ZakMcKracken841 point
-
ListDisk This tool provides detailed information about connected physical disks, including their partitions and volumes. Download https://github.com/GeorgeK1ng/ListDisk/releases Features Mounting/unmounting partitionsSetting partition labelsModifying MBR partition attributes Available Commands /mount - Mounts a partition to a specified drive letter./unmount - Unmounts a specified partition or drive letter./setlabel - Sets a new label for a specified partition./setactive - Sets or clears the bootable flag of a partition./settype - Changes the MBR type of a partition. Usage Examples /mount 0 1 U - Mounts Partition 1 on Disk 0 as U: drive./unmount 0 1 - Unmounts Partition 1 on Disk 0./unmount U - Unmounts U: drive./setLabel 0 1 Lbl - Sets 'Lbl' as the label for Partition 1 on Disk 0./setactive 0 1 - Marks Partition 1 on Disk 0 as bootable./setactive 0 1 80 - Sets the boot flag for Partition 1 on Disk 0./setactive 0 1 00 - Clears the boot flag for Partition 1 on Disk 0./settype 0 1 0x17 - Sets Partition 1 on Disk 0 to type NTFS Hidden (0x17)./settype 0 1 0x07 - Sets Partition 1 on Disk 0 to type NTFS (0x07). Requirements Operating System: Windows XP and newer. Note for Windows XP Users: This tool requires the installation of the Microsoft Visual C++ Redistributable. Please install it from this link.Compatible with Windows Preinstallation Environment (WinPE).Place ListDisk in %WinDir%\system32 to make it easy accessible from commandline! Note: Use this utility with caution. Incorrect usage may affect data integrity.1 point
-
Try this - without quotes! Despite what other users/user may tell you. --disable-features=WebUsbDeviceDetection1 point
-
Nothing in top post about winning or losing. I certainly haven't read all 74 pages. Is "Team" a repeat? I don't think it's the first. Edit your post with another word.1 point
-
None of these frequently discussed (on MSFN) Chromium clones are worth losing a sleep over. Most of their code is copy-paste off Chromium, they don't have their own legs to stand on, without Google LLC, they are nothing. I can relate. I think I should be making better use of my time here. How, I haven't a clue.1 point
-
1 point
-
I ported recently somehow AMD Radeon HD 8750m driver to Windows Vista😄 Photo: https://ibb.co/BzrKYgt1 point
-
Ah, I somehow missed that. I've only tried Supermium (and Thorium) on a single-core ThinkPad T42, WinXP x86 SP3, Pentium M 745. It's the only real (bare metal) XP that I've not upgraged.1 point
-
Fired up my Satellite A100 just for you (core solo t1350, 32-bit, single core). Supermium runs, but is unusable (nearly freezes with 100% CPU usage -- as advertised, win32 mentioned it needs 2 cores min.), Thorium (latest, all versions) is not recognized as a valid Win32 app (errors out, doesn't run). Might be my fault, though other browsers (Kafan Minibrowser, 360Chrome) run fine[ish. pretty slow]. Disregard, wrong windows version. Downloading/installing now, will update in a few mins Specs: XP 32 SP3, Core Solo T1350@1.86GHz, 4GB installed RAM.1 point
-
Technically, me neither as far as that goes. Listen, I "clung" to XP until just a month-plus ago, I really did "think" I was doing the right thing by doing so. I was wrong! Sometimes in LIFE, we get NOWHERE because it is we ourselves that HOLD OURSELF BACK! And MOST of the XP Users here at MSFN have admitted that periodically over the recent couple of years, they rely on their phone or tablets to get REAL work done, not their XP Dust Bunny. But yeah, "to each their own".1 point
-
I noticed a huge delay, before it finally got through, when posting inf. in a post. Like it checks something or so.1 point
-
Yes, tested in Windows XP VM under Linux Mint. `NetworkServiceSandboxEnabled` didn't have an effect (doesn't work on unsupported operating systems). PS, I think I know why my manually written policy under `HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Thorium` doesn't work. I have not applied the adml file from `thorium_policy_templates.zip` (no idea where to put it under XP, to be honest).1 point
-
1 point
-
I fail to see the point of this. OPEN SOURCE software is a "team effort". Period. If you want a good reveal on that, feel free to dive into Tobin vs Moonchild, roytam vs basilisk-dev, Chrome vs Chromium, et cetera.1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
Process Tamer 2.14.01 can be found here: https://www.donationcoder.com/forum/index.php?topic=43293.msg407794#msg4077941 point
-
I'll check it out, but I have a very problematic Haswell GT1 "ult" device (on Pentium), it works poorly even with the official drivers. https://www.phoronix.com/news/Intel-Haswell-GT1-Busted1 point
-
Maybe it works for this too? Thank you very much! Setting dom.forms.button.standards_compliant to false did the trick. For the very first time, I was able to upload a test file from New Moon 28 to my main folder on Codeberg. I am really happy. Great find! Thanks again!1 point
-
Moonchild mentioned a workaround - set dom.forms.button.standards_compliant to false on about:config page and restart the browser (page reload is not enough). Maybe it works for this too?1 point
-
Oh, I pretty much guarantee that the answer to that, worded that way, is "nothing". Rather, v114 *plus* v115 brought a SO-CALLED "security fix" that Chase just "has to have".1 point
-
1 point
-
Without the need to install yet another extension, changing the font can be done with uBlock Origin as well. 🙂 I like the Noto Sans font (hinted). Apply this rule in uBO to apply to all elements in the page: forums.digitalspy.com##*:style(font-family: "Noto Sans" !important; src: local(Noto Sans) !important;) Another example. Have Google search results display in bold: google.com##H3:style(font-weight:bold !important;)1 point
-
You're right. My Windows XP Professional SP3 32-bit is fully updated with all patches/updates after SP3 including all POSReady 2009 ones. But this was never a problem. And uBlock Origin 1.57.2 works fine here in single-process mode. Thus, I don't think that the problem is related to POSReady 2009 patches. But thanks for your opinion!1 point
-
Ok! I checked my system once again. In my Windows XP main partition, I unfortunately discovered that one of four registry keys relating to the region and language options had disappeared. No idea why. However, the time and time zone display was still intact. Fortunately, I have a second Windows XP partition from which I was able to export the missing key HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Control Panel\International and import it into my main partition. Now, all is working again. This fixing has actually led to a change in Firefox ESR 52.9.0. Now I also get the correct time and time zone displayed there:1 point
-
I found a further JavaScript command to get the correct, local time including DST in the web console of New Moon 28, Firefox ESR 52.9.0 and Serpent 52 probably too: new Date().toTimeString().slice(0,8); returns the correct,, currently local time at the moment: "19:41:01"1 point
-
Here, I get the same as @AstroSkipper, so "ETC/GMT-1". Here unfortunately not as I already mentioned before:1 point
-
Although Proxomitron is definitely a great tool (I used for some time in the past), it's more for security nerds. The more tools are involved in something (filtering and blocking content, elements and scripts), the more it needs to be properly configured and readjusted. I don't want to have such an additional tool for filtering in the background. uBlock Origin serves all my needs. And in some profiles, I have additionally installed ematrix. That's absolutely enough for me. No need here for more, but rather less.1 point
-
I can't confirm your observation. My Windows XP system always shows the correct DST time. But I don't get the correct system time in the original Firefox ESR 52.9 when usimg the JavaScript commands: new Date().toLocaleString(); new Date().toLocaleString('de-DE'); We have summer time here, and these commands always show the winter time (1 hour less). I only get the current, correct DST time when using this command: new Date().toLocaleString('de-DE', {timeZone: 'Europe/Berlin'}); Same in New Moon 28. Tested in the web console and in a clock custom button I already modified in the past. So, no need to change anything DST related in my system. Cheers, AstroSkipper1 point
-
You couldn't run it on XP or even Vista. It happened only recently. And Thorium from that era was based on 109 Chrome, it simply couldn't be "unstable" on officially supported OS. We are interested only in recent tests.1 point
-
I have a similar Xeon Board from 2009. It was sold with the first edition of Server 2008. Server 2008 was issued to OEM sales on January 2008. Server 2003 and XP64 had some odd behaviour with the C-states of Xeon CPUs. I had to force C1 state only, and the issues were gone.1 point
-
First thing that comes to mind: Alcohol 120%, Daemon Tools, basically all virtual CD drive software and mounting, emulation tools, virtual drives. Daemon Tools 3.47 works in Windows 98 SE, that's for sure.1 point