Leaderboard

If we are to assume win32 still reads Supermium topic, probably better to post there, in Supermium topic, who knows maybe he will fix it, then. I already linked to a possible fix. https://msfn.org/board/topic/185045-supermium/?do=findComment&comment=1264207

New build of Serpent/UXP for XP! Test binary: Win32 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win32-git-20240427-3219d2d-uxp-92e1373e8c-xpmod.7z Win64 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win64-git-20240427-3219d2d-uxp-92e1373e8c-xpmod.7z source code that is comparable to my current working tree is available here: https://github.com/roytam1/UXP/commits/custom IA32 Win32 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win32-git-20240427-3219d2d-uxp-92e1373e8c-xpmod-ia32.7z source code that is comparable to my current working tree is available here: https://github.com/roytam1/UXP/commits/ia32 NM28XP build: Win32 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win32-git-20240427-d849524bd-uxp-92e1373e8c-xpmod.7z Win32 IA32 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win32-git-20240427-d849524bd-uxp-92e1373e8c-xpmod-ia32.7z Win32 SSE https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win32-git-20240427-d849524bd-uxp-92e1373e8c-xpmod-sse.7z Win64 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win64-git-20240427-d849524bd-uxp-92e1373e8c-xpmod.7z No official UXP changes picked since my last build. No official Pale-Moon changes picked since my last build. No official Basilisk changes picked since my last build. My changes since my last build: - tzdata: update to 2024a (de7e7860ff) - icu: fix getting windows timezone on legacy windows (92e1373e8c) Update Notice: - You may delete file named icudt*.dat inside program folder when updating from old releases. * Notice: From now on, UXP rev will point to `custom` branch of my UXP repo instead of MCP UXP repo, while "official UXP changes" shows only `tracking` branch changes.

What issue do you refer to? Your statement is a bit unclear, at least for me.

Why didn't you say right away that you mean the Adguard filter lists inside uBlock Origin if I understood you correctly this time? Clear questions would be more effective in obtaining suitable answers. Anyway! I will test these filter lists and report. However, in single-process mode, uBlock Origin works great as far as I can say.

So far, I have only used two extensions in multi-process mode, uBlock Origin and Clear Cache. Now that uBO is presumably working again, even if only by neutering the multi-process mode, I will test this mode more closely and report. In any case, I use it especially to access Codeberg because, as you already know, this website is not stable in single-process mode and does not work properly in New Moon 28 or Serpent 52.

Ok. Although Mypal 68 is based on Firefox 68, however, its JavaScript engine is more recent on 83 level. So theoretically, some other extensions may no longer function properly as a result. I will keep that in mind and report in my thread about extensions when such problems appear.

At least, on my old computer with a 32-bit single-core CPU. I did a little research about the preference extensions.webextensions.remote. This is a preference to disable separate webextensions process(es). When set to true, Mypal 68 will use separate content process(es) for webextensions that are installed in the web browser. The number of these processes can be set by the preference dom.ipc.processCount.extension with the default value of 1. When extensions.webextensions.remote is set to false, then Mypal 68 won't use separate content process(es) for these webextensions. The extensions.webextensions.remote preference will only be read once. If you are changing this preference, the browser needs to be restarted for it to apply. I now assume that this preference has no effect when using Mypal 68 in single-process mode because there is only one process.

I can speak to whether Microsoft fixed this DESIGN FLAW with Vista, I had already answered. It was never there, to begin with. Looks like they implemented that "design" starting Win 7 (which I can't stand!). Strange! Weren't you the one who had recently upgraded? Allegedly.

New build of post-deprecated Serpent/moebius for XP! * Notice: This repo will not be built on regular schedule, and changes are experimental as usual. ** Current moebius patch level should be on par with 52.9, but some security patches can not be applied/ported due to source milestone differences between versions. Test binary: Win32 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk55-win32-git-20240427-5f0f5811e-xpmod.7z Win64 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk55-win64-git-20240427-5f0f5811e-xpmod.7z repo: https://github.com/roytam1/basilisk55 Repo changes: - tzdata: update to 2024a (20a961b5a) - icu: fix getting windows timezone on legacy windows (5f0f5811e)

Currently, MCP are running a Gitea-v1.21.11 instance on their repo server to develop their platform+browser: ... but that version of Gitea is already somewhat broken when used in MCP's platform/browsers ; e.g., just navigate to the Home page of the PM source repo: https://repo.palemoon.org/MoonchildProductions/Pale-Moon and then try to download a tarball (or ZIP) of the source: It is impossible to perform any of the "More Operations" actions spawned when the ellipsis (...) button is clicked under UXP (latest NM28 tried), because they're not clickable/actionable-upon: ... the irony ; OTOH, I can use KMB (Chromium 87, released in mid-Nov 2020) to fetch that tarball (file "Pale-Moon-master.tar.gz") fine! ... Don't even get me started on HOW MUCH BROKEN Microsoft's "GitHub Web Client" is currently on UXP, all the more so for signed-in members ; GH on UXP is the reason that, since mid-Dec 2023, I practically abandoned my favourite (for many years) Serpent 52 for Kafan MiniBrowser (Cr87) and, at this time, also contemplating switching to either Supermium/Thorium ...

Does not work! It is labeled as a "work in progress" but it doesn't seem to be doing ANYTHING that an UNGOOGLED browser should do. Easy test, with no open tabs, clear your cache and then go to clear it a second time. An UNGOOGLED browser will NEVER show this after you just cleared your cache and you've not yet visited ANY web site PLUS this is with a profile that HAS NO EXTENSIONS. A Chrome-based browser that is NOT "ungoogled" has a CONSTANT line of communication "open" with the Web Store.

Thank you very much! I already tried different preferences. Also switching both preferences, extensions.webextensions.remote and extensions.webextensions.protocol.remote, together to the value false. But this didn't work. In contrast, as suggested by you, setting only the preference extensions.webextensions.remote to false seems to do the trick. Of course, I have to observe this for a while to be sure all is good now but at the moment, it is definitely working. So, many thanks again! BTW, does switching this preference to false have any disadvantages or negative side-effects?

AstroSkipper, try to switch extensions.webextensions.remote - false

Of course, we are only speculating here. Unfortunately, I have not yet been able to discover any error message or anything that would be helpful in investigating the cause of this issue. I wouldn't even have noticed this error, as I was actually only running Mypal 68 in single-process mode. I tried the multi-process mode just to see if it works well on my old computer and noticed that Codeberg.org runs stable in this mode. As already described, Codeberg.org stupidly leads to crashes in single-process mode.And it was @feodor2 last year who told me in his issues on GitHub that Mypal 68 produces less errors in multi-process mode than in single-process mode and would be therefore the more stable mode. So, I wanted to give this mode a try.

@genieautravail If 5 users will gether, okey next version will have SSE. What doesn't suit your already existing version, because new version is more bloated and likely has new errors. @AstroSkipper What about other things or this is happens only with Adguard, soon I shall make testing on P4 single core, @AstroSkipper@NotHereToPlayGames Multiprocess is not about cpu cores. Windows OS multiprocess itself since 1993 I think, and Intel 386 the first CPU which supports multiprocess. Also Firefox is not like Chrome here, they try be it latter at 100's, I think making every piece on the separate process is overkill. In general mp is good for performance, and stability too. If you have ar least 2gb ram prefer stay mp. Furthermore POSready updates installed everywhere on my side, never heard about issues with this.

People write it's dangerous Tutanota - "Either fraud or incompetence. No support. Hundreds lost. Absolute fraud. I don't know why I thought to go with these people over an established, reputable company. Can't believe how stupid I am. This company ate up ALL of the operating funds that my nonprofit had to work with, on what? Some bug? We never, ever agreed to this. Literally just signed up yesterday. Invoices are incorrect and mangled. If not intentional, VERY broken. Unresponsive support. SCAM." https://www.trustpilot.com/users/627cf4485f93600012c20263 Date of experience: December 09, 2023 More at TrustPilot Trustpilot. https://www.trustpilot.com/review/tutanota.de

Trustpilot. This what verified, legit users think. https://www.trustpilot.com/review/tutanota.de "Stay far away from the "free" version. I have both free and "paid" version. The free version should not be even offered free. There is NO protection from spam or phishing even if you signal each and every email. You will be bombarded with every imaginable unfiltered email that's out there. The free version is buggy. Ex, cannot send emails, cannot receive emails or they arrive late. Notifications often sent by Tutanota offering to "report" the problem but nothing changes. The spam rules (online) are confusing if looking for help and because your a cheepy who doesn't pay too bad for you. Figure it out for yourself!!" Date of experience: December 14, 2023

You can get the text back on Firefox 72 before whatever updated in the forum that broke compatibility, and Iron 109. For the MSFN links, when you paste the link, and the preview comes up, click the black banner that says to show only link. It seems that sometimes the preview option for forum links doesn't work.

Where do you see derailing? I'm replying strictly regarding the tool you yourself suggested to the OP as a replacement for the icon, which it does, btw. The question is why does it need the "assistant" service?

Holy crap, it adds and runs a dedicated service! "Assistant"

I think we all understood it as you use it at home, too, no?

If this fix really works, why do you need USB Safely Remove, then? What for?

Link?

But not a word about Vista, nor Win 10/11.

In Vista eSata can also be powered down.

Is this triple posting glitch back again?

The article is obviously old, it was a glitch in SP1, in RTM and SP2 - they do.

So, try to exit "USB Safely Remove", block it from running, reboot and try to eject the HDD.

FYI, this issue still exists in Mypal 68.14.0b. Just tested. Nevertheless, thanks for your new update and the changes to JavaScript in terms of local time and time zone! The functions .toLocaleString(), .toLocaleDateString() and .toLocaleTimeString() are working great now.

@feodor2 I have installed your latest version Mypal 68.14.0b and tried it in multi-process mode. Unfortunately, I had big problems with uBlock Origin, no matter if the latest version 1.57.2 or the last version 1.46 which was still compatible with FF 68. It was no longer possible to load additional filter lists, and the extension was only in an error state. uBlock Origin became inaccessible, and the browser even hung after closing. Especially when I tried to load the default filter list AdGuard - Ads. I also disabled the hardware acceleration but unfortunately without any effect. Something is seriously broken. And it seems to be the same in the previous release Mypal 68.13.9b also only in multi-process mode. However, no problems in single-process mode. Any ideas? Or am I the only one having such problems?

You're welcome! Then we also have to take into account that the iteration you talk about first came through Russia repackers' hands. As it is based on a repack from Russia.

Oh thanks, so that was rumours about Jan. 2024 build.

No fix, as we know. Most importantly, if the system certification path says this certificate is OK, you have nothing to worry about. Ignore.

Online Translator