Leaderboard

13.5.1030 should also pass if Disable site isolation in chrome://flags/ is set back to Default. Browser restart is needed for this to take effect. After restarting, double-check in chrome://flags/ that the change actually took - 360 occasionally doesn't save its state properly upon shutdown. If the setting is OK, https://mybrowseraddon.com/webrtc-control.html should work. Tested with a freshly unzipped 360ChromePortable_13.5.1030_rebuild_7_ungoogled profile, YMMV if other settings have been customized. The reason this works in 13.5.2022 is that the distribution doesn't include a pre-set \User Data\Local State the way 13.5.1030 does, so there are no customized preferences loaded from it.

I've prepared a version which should fix M sized icons mix up https://startisback.com/StartAllBack_setup.exe

Not to worry it still works fine and receives virus definitions etc.. If you want to get rid of that red x you can always do a clean install. Please go through this thread : https://forum.avast.com/index.php?topic=220639.285 On page one you can get 18.8 download also an off line installer is available. Do not forget to use avast clear for xp/vista from reply 295 AvastClear.exe file is 9.63 MB (10,105,016 bytes). https://install.avcdn.net/iavs9x-xp/avastclear.exe Cheers PS: I'll be doing this in about 9 days since I got 8 days left .

In my installation of 360Chrome v13.5 build 1030 rebuild 7, the Cloudflare check of the website https://mybrowseraddon.com/webrtc-control.html is passing successfully although the check takes a bit longer than usual. Setting back the flag Disable site isolation to Default was the first action I did when I installed this new build. It works definitely better with this default setting. Additionally, I added 18 flags and two command line switches. And of course, extensions. In total 13 of them, but not all of them are enabled. I manage them with the extension Extension Manager.

Honestly, hate to say it, forum drama gets old tbh. Otherwise, I started out not taking it too well, but I decided to get outside and I feel better for having done so and steeping away from the PC. Glad you are doing well.

I made a video on how to compile KernelEx. Part1: Install and configure tools Part2: How to compile KernelEx And I will make a video soon on how to make an upgraded instalation.

In this short article I quoted above, I recommended the AV program WiseVector StopX. As mentioned in a previous post, you should configure it very carefully though to avoid problems if using it. Some programs have to be excluded from monitoring, otherwise they won't work. WiseVector StopX seems to examine many executed programs much deeper than other AV programs. If you trust these executed programs which WiseVector StopX doesn't seem to like, you have to exclude them from monitoring in two different locations: in the main program window under Exclusions and additionally in the Settings under Advanced Protection Settings if necessary. After one week of using, exclusions in boths lists are definitely necessary for all editions of 360Chrome browsers, Serpent, and some others. For some programs, however, the entry of the program or program folder in the main exclusion list is sufficient. Cheers, AstroSkipper

Got it, thanks.

Pretty sure he didn't intend it that way. It's just how his writing style comes off (at least to us Americans). One gets used to it after a while. Yes, since I don't get on that often, I was reading the penultimate page of the thread and decided to reply. I posted my reply, and the board moved to my post on the final page; I then edited my reply to add more info, after which I finally scrolled up and saw that the conversation had continued for several more posts including yours. But, there's no "delete" option, and I didn't want to edit my post down to merely "Never mind...."

Yeah, the point of it is to pick address on its own, calculating it from the DLL file name hash. Edit: actually, the starting address can be specified in the INI file, then the actual address will usually be somewhere above that address, depending on the name. I'm not sure, maybe with certain name it would end up at the same spot as starting address. Both LiBase and ReBase support rebasing multiple DLLs at once, so then multiple DLLs would end up somewhere above specified address - ReBase puts first DLL at the specified starting address and the rest of DLLs after the first DLL one after another, LiBase should guarantee they end up above that address and separated between each other at least as much specified in the INI, the default setting of 1 MB is definitely not guaranteeed to work correctly with larger DLLs ( > 1 MB). If you didn't get INI file in downloaded ZIP of LiBase, you can re-download, I've re-uploaded it sometime after initial upload. Though it's possible to figure out what options are read from the INI by reading the source code.

I trust you and only do what you enjoy and we're happy you share your project with all ove us.

I'd have to jump through the hoops all over a second time, but I don't seem to recall LiBase even "working" on my system. I had to use ReBase and experiment with the actual start address. Whereas LiBase had no option for start address (that I recall).

Absolutely ... I'm with you all the way and we can lean on each other during rough times and then, when you are energetic (not that your are not already) you can build up others and I will do the same. You WILL succeed I guarantee it and I feel so glad you are "getting good" and I like that choice of wording. And old dear DD friend used to always say, you'll do good and we'd laugh but that was so right. Do well, of course, you might be unaware of the old saying: Do what you do - do well. In other words.. Do (what you do) what you do (whatever that is to you) do (just do it) (and do it) Well. We've got this and don't get discouraged when you find yourself in a dark spot because that is all its is just a spot as with good and bright spots; you can't see the light unless you recognize the dark, find the balance and sail (Just like @UCyborg) we are in rough waters; always. Unsteady world so we keep afloat and go with the current but always keep the shore in sights. I know (without question) you will find this contentment, try to avoid seeking the happiness trap and look for contentment. You ARE a very good person and your purpose has not even be (fully) discovered yet, so stay tuned, and over the next few years after graduation you'll being to find your footing and your life will present itself and (if I can be so bold) your agoraphobia will also gradually start to turn away form fears and anxiety and into excitement. I'm excited for you, now I need to lift myself away from *known* triggers as I did today and I got off the couch and up in the shower and dressed with turned off the toxic news.

You have more control with ReBase. Seems MinGW's linker uses hash of DLL name by default, similarly to LiBase, at least according to this, though I didn't bother to dig into the source code, which I'd have to find first. Was software as complex as modern web browser a thing in the old days?

Did you also try "ReBase.exe"? Or did you only try "libase.exe"?

No, I tried myself and the newer Intel HD 4000 versions worked partially for me. The driver has no problem in Device Manager. Only DirectX 9 API causes BEX64 crashes.

Hello @UCyborg! After using the method of rebasing the chrome.dll for a while, I have to thank you once again for sharing this method and providing a link to the tool libase. From now on, I am able to make sense of the 360Chrome browsers in my system and especially the version 360Chrome v13.5 build 1030. Kindest regards, AstroSkipper

From now on, users of avast! Free Antivirus 7 or older can use this universal key provided by avast! here: https://www.avast.com/registration-free-antivirus#pc On this website, you'll find additionally this information: Cheers, AstroSkipper

13.5 - last for XP

@djole123 Can't say anything specific as I haven't fiddled with OneCore API, but these browsers have their own integrity/signature check (not based on Authenticode). If you haven't modified the original files in any way, apparently OneCore API lacks (has stubbed?) something this integrity check needs to pass properly. Assuming the integrity check is the only problem and the browser is otherwise workable with OneCore (not guaranteed with such complex software), the check could probably be patched out like it has been with modded 360 v13 browsers. You could try asking (via Googletrans) here or here on a Russian-language forum also frequented by the people who did the patching, or at least those who know them and can ask them about it. Maybe they've already done it for v14 as well, I don't follow these topics very closely. (I could maybe do the patching myself once I've checked out how they did it, but I don't know when I'd get to it, and I'm not as familiar with x64 as I am with x86. In any case it's much easier/faster for those who've already gone through it.) Edit: I believe @grey_rat is also a member there, maybe he could ask about it for you. Then again, as a Serbian you may be able to do it pretty easily yourself (I didn't notice your country at first). Edit2: Oh, and welcome to the forum! Didn't notice this was your first post, either.

I guess I shouldn't have been so categorical, this actually is somewhat of a problem for automated captcha solvers.

But...wasn't it you who taught us not to look back, to live for today??? Yes, it was you. So...

Try re-make the Vista installation in VM but without the Intel HD 4000 driver installed, then re-capture into WIM file. You could try using NTOSKRNL Emu_Extender to install the Intel HD 4000 driver, do this in the Surface. Note: The driver signature enforcement must be disabled, through F8 boot menu, BCD configuration tweaking, or test mode.

Scroll up on this page.

There is the open source-port Wolf4gw/Sod4gw. It seemed to support the unique resolution your video card is using (probably over S-Video). That I can share. 4gw.zip

Yeah, my bad, I was experimenting with some flags and didn't intend to upload with that flag set. That flag does decrease the number of processes and thereby cuts down on RAM but I don't run that flag with my default config.

Yeah, breaks are awesome sometimes, clear the cobwebs.

@UCyborg just wanted to also in addition to the reaction like, Just thank you for being so open and we do care about you here.

Lookie here, I found some widely available literature on what happens when/if someone blocks D.Draker. Names and my short resumes below. The modern ones are too plain, on the other hand - straight to the ponit. "A day without D.Draker - pain with pleasure, or just pain ?" 2016 Intriguing, with a soft touch of mystery. "D.D. haunts me wherever I go, will magic help ?" 1991 Over saturated with dark rituals. So-so. "Will blocking D.Draker bring me satisfaction ?" 2018 This one's a waste of money, in my opinion. Could give you a spoiler - no. "The 101 best pieces of advice on how to kill time between D.Draker's posts." 2020 A good one, recommend.

There is no answer to that! Browser choice has always always ALWAYS been about "personal perference". What works for me, will not work for you. What works for you, will not work for me.

Guide available to install Office 2013 on Vista!

- Moved all edited browsers to the Internet Archive (hope the platform exists forever). - Created simple lanchers for each browser (BATCH) (they have to be put in the same place the executable of the browser is to work). - Created a rebase BATCH script for each browser (only for the main DLLs of the browser like chrome.dll and/or chrome_child.dll). The "rebase" folder has to be on the same place the executable of the browser is and then you can execute the "rebase.bat" file inside that folder). All files can be seen easily here --> https://archive.org/download/360EE_Modified_Version Cheers.

Thanks for the info. Again wondering if there is any way to port these newer versions back to Windows 7, for example if the missing APIs/DLLs were covered by VxKex in the future. Although according to this Microsoft article, "as of January 2022, attempting to do a new installation of Version 2002 will fail." I actually installed version 2002 in February 2022 successfully. I used a custom "Configuration.xml" file to download files for version 16.0.12527.22100 (latest at the time) and then installed locally. Don't know what would happen if one attempted to install in a new setup in the future.

This was a sad turn of events I'm seeing. I know things happen between members that I do not see( catch ), but life it too short to hold grudges.

I would really love to understand where do people base their claims that accepting http, visiting certificate issue-ridden websites for a little while, using older operating systems, automatically risk you to a huge financial loss-private life damage-data loss-ransomware or whatever because well, it is said so. It seems to me like one of many dogmas and ideological tendencies inside computer science which are questionable, unilaterally imposed by companies in their half-cartels, and mostly to deal with simpler users and people who do not have a technical support in their homes to manage their machines or networks, or as a masquerading reason for obscure intentions. I can cite the idea of google to kill cookies.

No actual problem happening, security issues are MASSIVELY overblown by the same people who think TPM can save you from kernel attacks stealing your data uncrypted and firewalled older Windows NT is unsafe compared to SELinux +/or a full sandboxed blink-centered operating system or real time protection exploit protection miraculous defenses in "windows" 10/11, so here we go for (my dream) + 10-15 years of nt 6.0 (in my desktop) and 6.1 (in my laptop) and let obtrusive faithful rejoice in their massively paranoid ideological-dogmatic preaching