All Activity

I have already complained to Google about their dubious behavior against operators of websites of certain nationalities. The impertinence of simply blocking sites on suspicion and without any real justification Maybe they should revise all their AI garbage and let living individuals check dangerous websites again

Vale

Fixed links in first post, I'm not sure if it's same, but I grabbed it from my other repository - it should be from my latest builds.

Dale

When I once tried Windows 7 on a GTX 9800 ++, it had weirdly shaking windows, all windows could just start to shake all at once for no apparent reason. Vista got no problems on the same PC. Many years later I installed an updated Win 7 ISO on that PC, and there was no such issue anymore. Fixed in the updates? Windows 7 and server 2008 R2 are very buggy.

How's this off-topic, uncontrollable stream of poor imagination, riddled with 2nd grader's smileys and personal insults supposed to help me? I understand you're very new to this forum and still learning how to make posts, please take example from UCyborg, who have helped me just fine, fast and even before the usual spam you posted, From him, I got all I needed to know, and without overly excessive babblery. Thank you @UCyborgfor the detailed explanations, good night!

Damn, I just re-downloaded TestCrash427 and installed it, everything works again!! Edit: To add, that now I get lots of crashes, "Exception Breakpoint"

Hey Folks, I have read thru this a few times, dont seem to see my answer needed, excuse me if I missed it! Been using MyPal, latest version was great for me 68.14.1b, then I tryed the TestCrash427, which crashes when launching the program, no error messages. Tried to go back to last version ... get message ... you have launched an older version of MyPal and need to create a new profile, which I dont want to do. how I fix this? How do a launch in a single process mode? Not sure if it was doing it already. I got WinXP pro uSP4 fully patched, been working great except not having a good broswer. Found MyPal, fell in love!!

Well, we knew he was unpredictable. I know he had a strong objection to having to register his app with all the major email services just to use OAuth2, which they pretty much all require now (and was also the reason I started this thread). I don't know if that factored into his decision though.

I usually do not use the YouTube interface in New Moon 28 or other browsers under Windows XP. It was just an experiment to see whether it is possible at all on my underperforming, old machine in these days. And it is still possible and above all, without ads or anti-adblocker messages. As I already said, I normally send YouTube links to one of my external players or download them with one of my YouTube downloaders. For watching them in legacy browsers under Windows XP I use Invidious or the extension uTube.

The BS behavior looks like this if I try to grab the scrollbar "brick". Frozen and doesn't scroll. I have to close and reopen the application for it to work normally. I suspect one of the web browsers that has h/w acceleration in the background might trigger it. If I click on the free space to move one page, it keeps scrolling as if I held down the LMB. The problem doesn't happen on Win2003 on the same computer. I don't have the Vista Aero theme because I don't want the Desktop Experience Pack "bloat" on the computer. I suspect the issue might go away with it. This guy thought that the Windows controls even with Aero (apparently) are crippled. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ay-gqx18UTM

... On mine, too ; this has been already reported before by him/them, but D.Draker, Saxon (and the rest of the gang ), for reasons probably only particular to him/them, have problems displaying ImgUr image embeds inside MSFN posts; so, by linking to yet another ImgUr screengrab, you're not proving anything to him/them ; FWIW, "error 429" is explained here - I have NO issue at all viewing "imgur.com" hosted pictures in any (recent-ish) browser/OS (Vista SP2, Win7 SP1, Win10) in my household ...

If you don't want to see or write comments, what is the use of the stripped down web interface? You might be able to watch 720p downloaded to disk, with more precise and responsive seeking. Search from Alphabet using site:youtube.com gives better results. The internal YT search tries to guess too much what you really meant and suggest synonyms.

Many thanks @VistaLover for your explanations, @basilisk-dev for resolving the glitch, and @roytam1 for not inheriting it (at the last moment)

I was trying 32-bit version, 64-bit obviously couldn't possibly load 32-bit DLL. The thing is programmed to call undocumented API NtCreateKeyedEvent with an object name \KernelObjects\SRW_WakingEvent, which fails unless the calling application is run with administrative rights, as KernelObjects namespace is restricted. Why would I run a buggy web browser on a buggy insecure OS with unrestricted access to everything?! I live by the principle_of_least_privilege. I modified the DLL to use BaseNamedObjects instead. Also changed DesiredAccess parameter of both NtCreateKeyedEvent and NtOpenKeyedEvent calls from 0x2000000 to 0xF0003. Don't know what former is supposed to mean, but the latter has been documented to translate to KEYEDEVENT_ALL_ACCESS, which sounds about right. Browser was unusable crash fest with the original. chrome-xp-api-adapter_x86.b5044.zip There was an error on launch that said: The application failed to initialize properly (0x80000003). Click on OK to terminate the application. That was with DLL build 5041, in the latest version 5043, he put a block on XP x64 and most other OS...an error saying it's not supported. Not supported my a**, I removed the block. Can both XP x64 and XP x86 users here check the modified the DLL above and see how it works? If it's broken, should be apparent right away as new versions are about new synch code using keyed events, kinda important. Edit: Well, non-NT 5.x systems are still blocked, not sure how much mess is in there that it would be needed to prevent the user from getting crappy (non-working) experience...I could throw the check out entirely. But now it's really late here, so time to sleep.

its bat s***

I think I was clear : Linked binaries are of the official Basilisk browser application (by Basilisk-Dev), built on the official UXP platform (by MCP); requires Win7 SP1 at minimum to launch, has ALL support for Web Extensions, multiprocess, Container tabs and EME removed (compared to Serpent 52); thus, usability-wise, it's like official Pale Moon+Australis interface+WebRTC; I keep a copy of it myself in my household's Win7 SP1 old laptop, just to check/verify if St52's bugs are also present there, too ...

thank u ever so much

Never heard of it. https://www.palemoon.org/history.shtml

unattend.xml is in the right path and will work

strange . What are the programs that crushed ? Is the NT4 installed in English or not?

SP6a was installed,as well as IE4 and IE6.

maybe the SP6a is not installed at before ?

Guanno it is still outdated...

The problem before is that....i couldn't run apps after installing the extended kernel.