Jump to content

Leokids123

Member
  • Posts

    186
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Donations

    0.00 USD 
  • Country

    Brazil

About Leokids123

Profile Information

  • OS
    Windows 10 x64

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Leokids123's Achievements

9

Reputation

  1. At least i put in the right month. Also,go place your games in the trash,if you had one!
  2. Too focused on the UXP supposed improvements that you literally forgot about Retrozilla 2.3 eh?!
  3. I'm testing YT2009 with my patched Flash 9.0.289.0 and it works...but had to enable flash player since it lacked HTML5 video of some sort...
  4. I'll touch this again and I'll say i got a new VM for NT 4.0,so i will be testing some new games...
  5. Whoever made these changes should have been reverted due to what it resulted into...
  6. I've got my NT 4.0 VM back and...you can suggest anything now...
  7. I wonder what's next...try to update your fork of Retrozilla to 2.3? Update cert store or ciphers to the latest in all browsers?
  8. Oh..i see...But have you even tested to see if it hurts perfomance? Benchmarks is fine...?
  9. Wait...aren't "performance improvements" intended to improve performance...?
  10. It's an edge case caused by Cloudfare failing to verify UXP browsers.... It does feel like Cloudfare hates UXP browsers due to them being based on 52ESR and being underestimated in its modern capabilities... Even if the reality is different...
  11. I can see... Thanks, @basilisk-dev!
  12. Yeah but both XP and 2000 were NT 5.x Also,NT 5.1 without service packs can only use browsers meant for 2000,not XP,these XP browsers require at least XP SP2-SP3...
  13. Okay. But why say it's now ancient history?
  14. Yep... Your browser's one of the niche browsers who supports such systems... In the future,since you're experimenting with old systems,maybe one day,you might attempt older OSes of Windows! Haha... Yeah,but when i say FINOSS i mean more like their actions or demeanor... Yeah...but why?
×
×
  • Create New...