Saxon

Partially right. Yes, the GUI worked with GTX 1060 and XP using 368.xx driver, with 1050 it gets BSOD, just like it was written at the start of the topic already.

Wrong, no acceleration was available at all.

My profile picture was also compressed to 3kb retroactively, despite it was added a long time ago and it was a normal size.

And that attempt was made using gtx1060, which is even older than 1050! XP drivers only exist up to 36x.xx , for 1050 you need 373.xx as the minimum. But it's only made for Vista and up (thanks to D.Draker). If you try, you will get BSOD.

First, 1050Ti is not supported even on Vista! But with @D.Draker ported driver it works with Vista. D.Draker never released 1050 driver for XP. No one did that. There was an attempt on youtube, but it failed miserably. No hardware acceleration worked because XP lacks directX 11, that's what I meant by properly.

We'd like to see a comparison, apart from the UI.

Nvidia GTX 1050Ti will never work properly with XP.

Platform Updates are not required for DirectX 11, you confuse with new Firefox versions video playback, for DirectX 11 you only need Windows 6.0 KB2117917. Chrome users don't need Platform Updates, especially.

My mom's a criminal defence attorney. In court, you need to provide exact details, but you explicitly denied to do that, without the knowing your version we have nothing more to investigate, the court denies your application. Added. As for Kaspersky in general, there was an investigation here already, also by "ancient" and respected members, in this topic, about the fact it changes main Windows system files, scroll back,

We'd need to see some actual evidence, statistics from independent sources, fact checked researches. Until then, it's just a guess. I've never even heard of this programme before, in Belgium we don't use it, and the first time I read about it was here, but no proof of its alleged "quality" was ever provided..

About 18 Euro per 4Gb, here in Belgium, not much.

Could there be strings attached?

We are looking forward to it! Will the Ungoogled patches be also applied?

The current name is better.

You're very welcome. I just don't think those 28nm cards would go that deep into idle modes. A 28nm chip is still a 28nm chip, GDDR5 VRAM is also power hungry. And 0.9W is more like for when the system boots up. GT710 is 19W, but what is there to downclock that much further? It's a very weak card to begin with. Probably, it's vaild for notebook versions? As there were both, 710 and 750 used in notebooks. https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/geforce-gt-710.c1990