All Activity

Thanks, but my goal is to have a browser that doesn't need those dubious, over or almost a decade old "updates". Those threats they addressed in the previous century, are no threats any longer. Will you help me?

Which r3dfoxESR 140? NB, 140.5.0esr has been LibreWolf-ified (read above), while previous ESR, 140.2.0, has NOT... That one, too, is LibreWolf-free ... Hard to tell these days ... Since I always use the "portable" r3dfox variants (the browser profile is created inside a "Profile" dir adjacent to (r3dfox | r3dfox_esr).exe), I couldn't possibly have noticed your findings ; based on your findings, though, this is how I would migrate from r3dfox-139 to r3dfox-140esr: 1. Launch 140esr a first time and let it write/populate its default fresh profile in the "new" location (in "%AppData%\R3dfox ESR\" ?) ; 2. I suppose you've already done this, but with 140esr open, load "about:support" => Profile folder (where you can see the absolute path to the ESR profile) => Open Folder 3. Exit r3dfox-140esr; then, erase all contents of the fresh ESR profile (open in an Explorer window in step 2, above) 4. Inside the (now empty) 140esr profile folder, transfer/place all contents of your r3dfox-139 (release) profile (NOT the profile dir itself, just what it contains); 5. Launch 140esr anew; it SHOULD now load what was previously your r3dfox-139 profile... (Disclaimer: I haven't actually performed such a profile migration myself, my "guide" is based on educated guesses )

Thank you!

@UsefulAGKHelper Setup an XP VM and run it from in there, that's how I do it.

Disregard. Reverted to WinPenPack's launcher and using its [RunAfter] section instead of Chrome++'s launch_on_exit= section.

On my latest Windows 11, I can't run build.exe (amd64)... @Dietmar

roytam1 You still haven't answered the question Link

migrating from fx27 to nm28 directly may get you trouble, you may try migrating to nm27 first.

Today, I updated my Chrome++ from version 1.11.1 to the most-recent version 1.13.3 (due to older versions do not properly work with Chrome versions v140 or newer). I use the launch_on_exit= feature of Chrome++. v1.11.1 would run a .bat file on exit WITHOUT popping up a flash of a command window. v1.13.3 flashes up a command window, cycles through the line items of the .bat file, then closes the command window. How do I prevent the FLASH on, closes when completed, command window from FLASHING on, kind of an EYE SORE.

Seems NEW TOPICS are no longer allowed to be posted here at MSFN. I know it's not just me because SEVERAL others have cited this in recent weeks. We have to reply to current topics instead.

Im trying to make some Radeons HD working. I made Radeon 3470 working fine with Black Wing cat 12.xx and last extended kernel , but i have trouble with Radeon 7350, i installed 12.xx drivers again OpenGL - Quake 3 and Unigine Heaven are running, but not DirectDraw Acceleration or Direct 3D, there is no Direct3D device present, same with DxDiag, probably problem with some registry Direct 3D device HAL definition. I have also some problem with Windows 2000 drivers in overall, for some reason when i load some drivers file i see just white area without entries where drivers should be.. and its different error than not compatible drivers where found, in that case i get popup with same error message. It seems that some drivers database or parsing is broken So i cant use Display compatible devices dialog and i can only use Search driver, point to folder and inf and let driver to be autodected, but i can force specific driver. There is also problem with Catalyst Center, old ATI installers have some standalone installer for it, but newer version have it embedded within drivers installer i failed to extract it from it. I also find out that some newer Catalyst center had less options than older version - so far im using Catalyst reporting this version 1.2.2314.20337 -from 2006, i dont remember which version its in ATI numbering.

Thank you so much!

Anyone still experience issue on cloudfare sites, that the verification check runs in cycle? (when recent Mypal runs on XP). Some sites do work even without any prompt for verification check.Even if I try to disable Ghostery, no luck. Example from Thorium the verification does normally work.

The 153 error relates to the referrer header – Google have decided that when embedding a video you can't block it any more. It's worth noting that when these useless error codes appear that you can right-click ... copy debug info ... paste that info somewhere you can read it, and then look towards the bottom for: "debug_error" The 153 error will reveal itself as: "embedder.identity.missing.referrer" which is the clue that it is caused by a missing referrer header. Ben.

@UsefulAGKHelper Here I put W2003_tools_update.7z good luck Dietmar https://files.catbox.moe/7wrcnc.7z

Good starting point would be trying compile driver with Windows 98 DDK (not SE). There is seperate version for 98 FE that introduced WDM support for it. It also needed some additional programs like visual studio to function. You should not need Windows HLK as Windows 98 had no hardware signatures enforcing.

I always thought this browser was for the tinkerer who expects it to break sometimes and then troubleshoot and revert. Are there any consumer level users for New Moon perhaps in China? I had a few extensions that I tried to transfer from Firefox 27 (looks the same as New Moon) and they gave me troubles. I don't remember what I did inside the files and after 3 out of 4 loaded.

It doesn't work at all because the link from the download button was never archived... If you have it, publish a new download link please. https://web.archive.org/web/20230803065130/https://cdn-149.anonfiles.com/J1W9H1a8y1/7ffdf369-1691046090/W2003_tools_update.7z

@roytam1 already told you no: ... so, given that response, I was only trying to help. I'm sorry if you find it too "inconvenient," but you have a workaround now. And you only need to inconvenience yourself once for each add-on you install.

You are right, of course, but that "exact and precise finite control of these associations" is in practice left for "advanced" users, not "average" Windows user "Joe" (at least that's how I see it myself ) ... Like you, I was introduced to the PA.com format many years ago, and, actually, after an "accident" that happened during my WinXP era, when sister ran a "wipe whole C drive" virus on then "family" desktop; after a Windows reinstall (no C drive back-ups were being taken at that time ), I had to reconfigure all re-installed programs from scratch... PA.com format appealed to me, because I could "install" many programs on a second, D, disk partition, where both the applications' binaries and their settings would reside; in the unfortunate event of a second C partition "demise", all my "portable" programs on D partition would survive... I think most take "portable" to signify "have the app's settings alongside the app's main (binary) files, not save settings in %appdata% and/or the registry"; but "portable" also means "be able to store the app and its settings/configuration to a suitable external storage medium (USB stick, ExtHDD/SSD, etc.) and be able to transfer the storage device and use said "portable" app across many different hosts, without permanently impacting (and/or leaving traces in) each host's fie system/registry/etc. ; this is why most portable app authors advise not to establish associations of any kind with the host system the portable app is currently running on; yes, I've come across very "smart" portable launchers that clean up the host system after the app has been exited, but that depends on the exact launcher; during the years, I have seen portable-application users associating portable launchers with the host system, and this has less risk overall, but, TBH, I don't do that myself either... Now I'm thinking of it, my advice "not to associate" was particular to the simple "Sm-Portable.cmd" batch file I posted previously ; this isn't a proper "portable launcher" per se, so if you clicked on a URL link inside a PDF file and expected that to be opened in the "portable" Supermium "Profile", then I couldn't offer an "easy" way to do that (you'd probably have to mess with the registry, and so on) ; and the "--disable-encryption --disable-machine-id" switches were specifically added so that the portable "Profile" remains unlocked and accessible/readable across hosts ...

Well, I for one certainly hope that metro uwp framework and immersive shell *NEVER* gets backported to XP, lol.

FFmpeg update. XP: static shared libfdk-aac VISTAx86: static shared libfdk-aac

thanks, I know it, but we're always patching the OS here and there to make it look like the one we had in the past Microsoft should announce "Windows XP 2026" with a compatibility layer +0 an option to turn ON or OFF everything released after XP SP3, so we can have any of these features on XP: - any WDDM version - sysmain/superfetch - WSL linux subsystem - memory compresion ( Disable-MMAgent -mc ) - video memory pagination - aero on/off, dwm on/off - metro uwp framework immersive shell on/off.... - an option to choose vista/7/8/8.1/10/11 taskbar version - gpu scheduling (HwSchMode) - control flow guard - spectre, meltdown--- - kernel features / version... this will be better than any new windows... in a perfect world of course... but this won't never ever happen

Thanks as always to a thoughtful writeup. I'll add my own slight additions. I myself have not "installed" any software for the better part of two decades, I do as much as possible via PORTABLE applications. PortableApps.com popularized the use of portable software. They began in 2006. WinPenPack has actually been around for slightly longer (by mere months, not years). You go even further back (by years) when you include those of us with familiarity to UNIX. With regard to associations with protocols/files/applications, portable software isn't really about not having these associations, but rather having exact and precise finite control of these associations. This PRECISE CONTROL is really only limited by the user's own intentions/imagination. You really can have this PRECISE CONTROL be as simple or as complex as your heart desires. Your "host system" does NOT have to have *ANY* 'default browser' associations, no txt file associations, no ini associations, no pdf associations, no mkv/avi/mp4 associations. NO ASSOCIATIONS of any kind. But you can mix-and-match to your heart's content. Associate 'browser' protocols (http/https/ftp, for example) to all use Firefox *ONLY IF* PortableApps PLATFORM is running in the systray. But roll those ftp protocols over to something like CuteFTP *ONLY* if LiberKey is running in the systray. Split your media file associations so that audio files divert to VLC Player, mkv files divert to PotPlayer, mp4 files divert to Media Player Classic, and avi files divert to TEncoder Video Converter. "Portable" really can be as simple or as complex as you "need it to be".

There is a heart with the native taskbar, but I do not have the new icons on the native taskbar to be able to do a direct comparison. I wasn't sure if maybe they deprecated the heart with smart charging. There is a heart in control center though.