ruthan

Yesterday was released video 86Box + NT 4.0

Yeah, i already good it above, 3dfx cards would be probably the best, Matrox have some software driver and lots of ATI have OpenGL drivers only for Profesional line of cards. On physical machine you can get OpenGL 2.0 with Geforce 6x00 cards and there is even Direct3D to OpenGL wrapper (only OpenGL 2.0)

Not for 3D and Vmware / Virtualbox has some 2D drivers.

Its quite easy to install virtual machine with NT4, but not with working graphics.. For it you need PCem or 86box, what is hard, but not very easy. Im not sure what is Dosbox-X NT4 virtual machine support..

Well is very unclear and very misleading. It would not be hard to add 1 column, which cards are supported by which drivers.. just by looking into inf.

I tried to download it (first link), there is password for download link, its working fine, but 7zip needs different password, in the note is password, not changed, i searched link for passwords, tried all of them, but nothing seems to be working.

Ok that is nice for upload, i saw slow speed, google a bit and gave up too early, or its maybe Intel X540-T2 Windows XP problem, but i really saw 1.4 Gbit as connection speed and in different OSes it was full 10 Gbit. I saw sometimes higher speed for short moment but its usually some cache or bug in speed indicator, it is showing speed constantly during files copying it works, i was using Ramdisk to Ramdisk testing. Im still confused about that Realtek USB driver for XP, does it exists in some package to download, or CanonKong point as to some file to replace vanilla driver package, or we have just some idea how develop driver?

There are clearly people able to do amazing thing, but all these threads get pretty complicated, no simple finished package to download and BFU guide. I got lost by forwarded to some English forum, which seems to need some registration to read things, or some translations by Chrome are really bad. Its the shame, because there would be much more users of these amazing creations.

WIndows XP are limited to 1.4Gb/s (170 MB/s) even with Intel 10Gbit card, no USB involved, its some design feature in system which is blocking more, someone would have to fix it, to enable more.. I searched, i could be because: - no Receive Side Scaling (RSS) - so all is done on single core - Lack of Hardware Offloading - network card hardware is not use and all is calculating by CPU, i hope its not case of Intel drivers, but im not sure if XP supports all needed stuff to do it But i also found that 1.4 Gbit could be just some XP connection speed reporting problem..

My one reach 160 MB/s, but there some people which claims to get full 240 MB/s, but there are some guide how to get more but tuning lots of Device manage advanced settable parameters, i have tried, so far i failed but its hard to point it to USB ethernet device or to router. Check this post: At least one my machine i started after while problem with USB devices disconnecting from manage and reconnecting, with both 2.5 + 5 Gbit adapters, but it could be problem of used controller.. Because USB controller firmware update is nightware especially with cheaper ones, which are using different chips, i bricket some just by trying yeah you can return them to original state by using CHip programmers.. but for upgrade you need some magic chip details values and there are sometimes hard to get, you have low level knowledge of this stuff.. or have to find somebody who can find them for you in by understanding of datasheets. So manufactures problem trying to save on some additional chips.

Great thanks.

Yeah, but description is really misleading, there is this text for NetXtream at the top : BCM5700, BCM5701, BCM5702, BCM5703, BCM5704, BCM5705, BCM5714, BCM5715, BCM5718, BCM5721, BCM5722, BCM5723, BCM5751, BCM5752, BCM5753, BCM5754, BCM5755, BCM5756, BCM5761, BCM5764, BCM5780, BCM5782, BCM5786, BCM5787, BCM5788, BCM5789, BCM57760, BCM57761, BCM5762, BCM57765, BCM5901, BCM5906) so its wrongly guesting that it works in all OSes mentioned under it, there is not list per OS.. so its at least misleading and i even checked inf, but there is not classic list with names of devices.. As i wrote 5703 in NT4 too - NetExtreme I line, at least with different drivers. Maybe even 5721 PCI-E is even working in Win9x.. but in WIn9x / Win 2000 you can use USB lan / USB wifi adapters when you got into problems.. in NT4 probably not.

My memory is not working well, but im like 95% sure that i already tried these.. Soggies drivers - they failed more than once for me, it could be about skill, but i doubt it.. Because you can download lots of drivers which claims that support HW X,Y,Z and some old OS, but nobody tested them and they worked worked, its very easy edit inf and add some new option.. There are also drivers which simply claim NT suppport na never is mentioned lowest supported OS, so in theory they should work on NT, WIn2000.. but they never do, its often because some MS driver kit helper version, which rely on specific OS features..

Well Uniprocessor means Uniprocesor means not more multicore usage, or its still fine for multicore cpus? I have now 2 cpus in this machine. For me another PCI and PCI-X cards are working fine, even this one is half working, it just not keeps working after reboot.. It would probably need some HEX ASM magician to find out why.. Or find some old thread where someone fixed it, or find another card, which has good NT4/Win9x/Win2000/WinXP/Win7 driver and working with SBEMU in MS-DOS.

Well it was at least discussed..