Sampei.Nihira Posted February 18 Share Posted February 18 On 1/30/2024 at 9:57 PM, Milkinis said: bench scores aside, I personally don't feel it that faster but it performs better on heavy load web sites for sure W7 = Supermium 117 = 80 XP = Supermium 121 = 66 XP = chrome M115 = 58 360 chrome 13.5 = won't work https://www.principledtechnologies.com/benchmarkxprt/webxprt/ Hi, the latest release of Speedometer is 3.0: https://speedometer-preview.netlify.app/ 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
66cats Posted February 18 Share Posted February 18 50 minutes ago, Sampei.Nihira said: https://speedometer-preview.netlify.app/ Yikes. Supermium almost in single digits, nothing else even starts. Number go down; my sadness very big :'( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotHereToPlayGames Posted February 18 Share Posted February 18 (edited) A good not-so-good read on Speedometer 3.0 here -- https://www.techspot.com/news/97006-apple-google-mozilla-collaborate-speedometer-3-browser-benchmark.html I was hoping to find something that says 3.0 requires Chromium v109+ or Firefox v102+ or something as the "minimum requirement". Not finding any "minimum requirement" at the repository either -- https://github.com/WebKit/Speedometer Edited February 18 by NotHereToPlayGames Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
66cats Posted February 18 Share Posted February 18 (edited) 27 minutes ago, NotHereToPlayGames said: minimum requirement W11; FF 115.7 esr doesn't start (same box as in my XP pic above, current Chrome on the right). Edit: Current FF works. Edited February 18 by 66cats Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.Draker Posted February 18 Share Posted February 18 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.Draker Posted February 18 Share Posted February 18 5 hours ago, 66cats said: Yikes. Supermium almost in single digits, nothing else even starts. Number go down; my sadness very big :'( Yep, same for me. Maybe our hardware sucks? 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
we3fan Posted February 18 Share Posted February 18 20 hours ago, 66cats said: Dual-boot XP 32 & 64. What am i doing wrong? https://imgur.com/Daa5VB8 <OT> Hi cats, I see you have 5 Partitions, are they all Primary + Bootable? Are all 5 Partitions from 1 HDD, or more? </OT> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
66cats Posted February 18 Share Posted February 18 (edited) 21 minutes ago, we3fan said: 5 Partitions Hi we3fan, it's a regular MBR scheme, 3 primary and 2 extended [edit: one extended with 2 volumes, can never remember the jargon]. Extended partitions can have operating systems, the only thing they can't have is a boot manager (which goes on one of the primary partitions). On a different box now, but this one has similar layout. Edited February 18 by 66cats 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milkinis Posted February 18 Share Posted February 18 7 hours ago, NotHereToPlayGames said: https://www.techspot.com/news/97006-apple-google-mozilla-collaborate-speedometer-3-browser-benchmark.html https://www.phoronix.com/news/oneAPI-DPC-Compiler-Cheat-SPEC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
we3fan Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 <OT> Thanks @66cats, I appreciate it. I plan to make new Partitions soon so I'll keep this in mind. </OT> 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ED_Sln Posted February 24 Share Posted February 24 (edited) Solved the problem with monochrome emoji on Windows 7 and display emoji on Windows XP using Twemoji for chrome extension. https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/twemoji-for-chrome/fopgafjdjlongoeblobbafbnapafcicg Emoji are downloaded online, so the extension itself is very small and does not use much memory. This is how it was on Win XP: This is how it was after installing the extension. Edited February 24 by ED_Sln 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VistaLover Posted February 24 Share Posted February 24 3 hours ago, ED_Sln said: Solved the problem with monochrome emoji on Windows 7 and display emoji on Windows XP using Twemoji for chrome extension. https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/twemoji-for-chrome/fopgafjdjlongoeblobbafbnapafcicg ... Yes, thanks, this solution was already pointed to inside Sm's GitHub issue tracker some 6 weeks ago : https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/134#issuecomment-1883249689 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ED_Sln Posted February 25 Share Posted February 25 Not everyone reads the issues on github, so let it be here as well . 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
user57 Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 well x64 needs more ram then 32 bit but there more things involved that play a role - i dont know all either maybe it is time for a little discussion ... the instruction code is a such example, when you ask for a offset that is greater or in a higher area of 4 GB that questions is hit for example a other thing is coding a int 32 is 32 bit big (and so stored like this in memory) a int 64 need 64 bit memory thats a important reason that the offsets need to store instead of 32 bit 64 bits this "offset size, int size, register size" question follow you in many times i made a screenshot of a x64 app (regeedit.exe) , os is win7 x64 the app is shown as x64 in pe editor as in taskmanager BUT! it use x32 bit instruction sets ! as shown in IDA so in reality thats rather an 32 bit app when i compiled some apps up i saw a increase in file size not 100 % but like 50 % and if i rememberright (in some older x64 apps i meant to see they tryed to avoid this problem in only using 34 bits, that probaly dont work all the time) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave-H Posted March 5 Share Posted March 5 20 minutes ago, user57 said: well x64 needs more ram then 32 bit but there more things involved that play a role - i dont know all either maybe it is time for a little discussion ... Not here please, as it's off-topic. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now