Guest Posted February 18, 2024 Posted February 18, 2024 On 1/30/2024 at 9:57 PM, Milkinis said: bench scores aside, I personally don't feel it that faster but it performs better on heavy load web sites for sure W7 = Supermium 117 = 80 XP = Supermium 121 = 66 XP = chrome M115 = 58 360 chrome 13.5 = won't work https://www.principledtechnologies.com/benchmarkxprt/webxprt/ Hi, the latest release of Speedometer is 3.0: https://speedometer-preview.netlify.app/
66cats Posted February 18, 2024 Posted February 18, 2024 50 minutes ago, Sampei.Nihira said: https://speedometer-preview.netlify.app/ Yikes. Supermium almost in single digits, nothing else even starts. Number go down; my sadness very big :'(
NotHereToPlayGames Posted February 18, 2024 Posted February 18, 2024 (edited) A good not-so-good read on Speedometer 3.0 here -- https://www.techspot.com/news/97006-apple-google-mozilla-collaborate-speedometer-3-browser-benchmark.html I was hoping to find something that says 3.0 requires Chromium v109+ or Firefox v102+ or something as the "minimum requirement". Not finding any "minimum requirement" at the repository either -- https://github.com/WebKit/Speedometer Edited February 18, 2024 by NotHereToPlayGames
66cats Posted February 18, 2024 Posted February 18, 2024 (edited) 27 minutes ago, NotHereToPlayGames said: minimum requirement W11; FF 115.7 esr doesn't start (same box as in my XP pic above, current Chrome on the right). Edit: Current FF works. Edited February 18, 2024 by 66cats
D.Draker Posted February 18, 2024 Posted February 18, 2024 5 hours ago, 66cats said: Yikes. Supermium almost in single digits, nothing else even starts. Number go down; my sadness very big :'( Yep, same for me. Maybe our hardware sucks? 5
we3fan Posted February 18, 2024 Posted February 18, 2024 20 hours ago, 66cats said: Dual-boot XP 32 & 64. What am i doing wrong? https://imgur.com/Daa5VB8 <OT> Hi cats, I see you have 5 Partitions, are they all Primary + Bootable? Are all 5 Partitions from 1 HDD, or more? </OT>
66cats Posted February 18, 2024 Posted February 18, 2024 (edited) 21 minutes ago, we3fan said: 5 Partitions Hi we3fan, it's a regular MBR scheme, 3 primary and 2 extended [edit: one extended with 2 volumes, can never remember the jargon]. Extended partitions can have operating systems, the only thing they can't have is a boot manager (which goes on one of the primary partitions). On a different box now, but this one has similar layout. Edited February 18, 2024 by 66cats 1
Milkinis Posted February 18, 2024 Posted February 18, 2024 7 hours ago, NotHereToPlayGames said: https://www.techspot.com/news/97006-apple-google-mozilla-collaborate-speedometer-3-browser-benchmark.html https://www.phoronix.com/news/oneAPI-DPC-Compiler-Cheat-SPEC
we3fan Posted February 19, 2024 Posted February 19, 2024 <OT> Thanks @66cats, I appreciate it. I plan to make new Partitions soon so I'll keep this in mind. </OT> 1
ED_Sln Posted February 24, 2024 Posted February 24, 2024 (edited) Solved the problem with monochrome emoji on Windows 7 and display emoji on Windows XP using Twemoji for chrome extension. https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/twemoji-for-chrome/fopgafjdjlongoeblobbafbnapafcicg Emoji are downloaded online, so the extension itself is very small and does not use much memory. This is how it was on Win XP: This is how it was after installing the extension. Edited February 24, 2024 by ED_Sln 2
VistaLover Posted February 24, 2024 Posted February 24, 2024 3 hours ago, ED_Sln said: Solved the problem with monochrome emoji on Windows 7 and display emoji on Windows XP using Twemoji for chrome extension. https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/twemoji-for-chrome/fopgafjdjlongoeblobbafbnapafcicg ... Yes, thanks, this solution was already pointed to inside Sm's GitHub issue tracker some 6 weeks ago : https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/134#issuecomment-1883249689 5
ED_Sln Posted February 25, 2024 Posted February 25, 2024 Not everyone reads the issues on github, so let it be here as well . 1
user57 Posted March 5, 2024 Posted March 5, 2024 well x64 needs more ram then 32 bit but there more things involved that play a role - i dont know all either maybe it is time for a little discussion ... the instruction code is a such example, when you ask for a offset that is greater or in a higher area of 4 GB that questions is hit for example a other thing is coding a int 32 is 32 bit big (and so stored like this in memory) a int 64 need 64 bit memory thats a important reason that the offsets need to store instead of 32 bit 64 bits this "offset size, int size, register size" question follow you in many times i made a screenshot of a x64 app (regeedit.exe) , os is win7 x64 the app is shown as x64 in pe editor as in taskmanager BUT! it use x32 bit instruction sets ! as shown in IDA so in reality thats rather an 32 bit app when i compiled some apps up i saw a increase in file size not 100 % but like 50 % and if i rememberright (in some older x64 apps i meant to see they tryed to avoid this problem in only using 34 bits, that probaly dont work all the time)
Dave-H Posted March 5, 2024 Posted March 5, 2024 20 minutes ago, user57 said: well x64 needs more ram then 32 bit but there more things involved that play a role - i dont know all either maybe it is time for a little discussion ... Not here please, as it's off-topic. 2
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now