Jump to content

Sampei.Nihira

Member
  • Posts

    1,106
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    30
  • Donations

    0.00 USD 
  • Country

    Italy

Everything posted by Sampei.Nihira

  1. I understand your state of mind. I had the same "problems" when I abandoned Noscript (which works less well in Chrome than in Firefox): The same can be said of UBO, which works better in Firefox: https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/uBlock-Origin-works-best-on-Firefox I don't like to use outdated extensions with known open issues: https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uMatrix-issues/issues the unknown ones could be many more and more serious for both privacy and security.
  2. The times web page is an excellent example of profi cient use of Hard Mode. In the test below I used AdGuard MV3 in Hard Mode + uBO Lite (only to block URL's tracking parameter). The browser blocks 9 trackers + third-party cookies. Adguard MV3 another 11 blocks. Any network requests that may come through are blocked at DNS level. I am doubly calm and already ready for the MV3 revolution.
  3. https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Blocking-mode:-hard-mode
  4. Gorhill considers uMatrix a failure. I don't think there are any extension developers who will port uMatrix to MV3 (assuming it will be possible,I'm pretty sure not) because the user base would be extremely limited However you could run some tests with Speedomenter 2.1 with UBO Lite + I don't care about cookies. Who knows maybe the test is faster. Good work.
  5. I have no idea whether it will be possible to quickly convert an MV2 extension to MV3. Too many factors come into play not only the new API but also the service workers.... Currently, Google's MV3 hiatus has ultimately also put on hold the active development of MV3 extensions available in the Chrome Store. Some doubt also that too many MV3 extensions will be able to coexist together without generating problems for the browser. And this is not only because of the current limit of 30000 guaranteed rules per extension.
  6. uMatrix is an MV2 extension. Its execution should sooner or later be prevented in chromium-based browsers. Only in firefox-based browsers will MV2 and MV3 extensions be able to coexist. https://www.ghacks.net/2023/01/17/firefox-109-manifest-v3-support-security-fixes-and-improvements/ So if you want to continue,in the future, to use uMatrix you will almost certainly have to choose a browser like Brave (perhaps Vivaldi) or switch to a Firefox-based browser.
  7. Have you tried custom rules in My filters? https://www.reddit.com/r/uBlockOrigin/wiki/solutions/#wiki_youtube
  8. @NotHereToPlayGames Also check these flags + command line parameters if you want to increase performance which may not be measurable with Speedometer 2.1: https://github.com/dreammjow/ChromiumHardening/blob/main/flags/flags.md JITLess mode (check if enabled) decreases performance (but increases security). Also important for the browser is the adblocker mode,in the case of UBO (Hard Mode) makes the web page load faster (but increases possible breakage). Only a few people in the world are able to use Hard Mode efficiently. https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Blocking-mode With MV3, UBO will be replaced by UBO Lite (no blocking mode). With Adguard MV3, on the other hand, a blocking mode can be used. Currently (that I know of) only I use Hard Mode + TLD's (necessary due to lack of a logger). You can consider using NEXT DNS or AdGuard DNS to block ads,trackers,Cname, it affects browsing speed less than an extension. But you will not have the cosmetic filters.
  9. Those who are concerned about security should strengthen the: Policies in the latest version of Chrome. put Chrome on anti-exploit list. use Sandboxie Plus.
  10. https://blog.0patch.com/2023/01/0patch-security-adopts-microsoft-edge.html
  11. https://www.oo-software.com/en/shutup10 https://www.oo-software.com/en/ooappbuster
  12. MV3 timeline appears to be postponed: https://developer.chrome.com/docs/extensions/mv3/mv2-sunset/
  13. In addition to what Astroskypper said I add that active websocket is almost indispensable in some situations such as online games,chat,online trading...... Usually one should not worry about websockets because modern browsers do not allow connection to an unsecured server from a protected source. Try checking in the first test for an insecure connection (ws). If it is not allowed you should not worry about websocket: Test: https://www.piesocket.com/websocket-tester Test1: https://www.deviceinfo.me/ It is easier to use a rule in the adblocker if you want to block websocket: ||*$websocket in this way it is possible to insert exceptions.
  14. Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00 [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\SOFTWARE\Policies\Google\Chrome] "DnsOverHttpsMode"="secure" "DnsOverHttpsTemplates"="https://dns.adguard.com/dns-query" I use these registry rules in Edge. I changed the path. Verify that they are working. Of course change the DNS over HTTPS to whatever you like. P.S. I deleted my DNS (NEXT DNS) for obvious reasons.
  15. This is not correct. It depends on the Standard or Administrator account used Policies entered with HKCU also generate a "managed by organization" message. Example in Edge in my Standard account: I would advise all MSFN members who will be using Chrome in Widows 7 after support ends to strengthen browser policies: chrome://policy Example of policies that I put in my Edge:
  16. @NotHereToPlayGames Is it possible in the browser to set a custom DNS over HTTPS? If it is possible I would have a simple suggestion to eliminate/decrease some of the fears of unwanted connections.
  17. Thank you for your confirmation. Another user wrote me that the registry rule didn't work for him.
  18. It works in Chrome, but doesn't seem to work in Edge.
  19. Although it will not be of interest to any forum member while waiting for the resolution of the 2 open issues that I am most interested in I have finished setting up AdGuard Mv3. With my rules now I can pass this test : https://apps.armin.dev/ping-spotter/ I set up Hard Mode as in UBO but made easier by TLD's: https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Blocking-mode:-hard-mode I have improved privacy/security and web pages load much faster. I inserted 2 custom lists to improve privacy/security: It is possible to simultaneously enable UBO Lite to block the URL's tracking parameter. In this case with only one filter enabled: AdGuard URL Tracking Protection List
  20. Keep me informed. Since you read my old thread,I remember that I had run into a problem with Oauth2 authentication if it was done with IE8 (which of course should definitely not be the default browser).
  21. Unfortunately, I no longer have a way to use Windows XP to be able to help you. https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/pop-imap-and-smtp-settings-8361e398-8af4-4e97-b147-6c6c4ac95353


×
×
  • Create New...