Jump to content

Sampei.Nihira

Member
  • Posts

    1,270
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    30
  • Donations

    0.00 USD 
  • Country

    Italy

Sampei.Nihira last won the day on July 23 2021

Sampei.Nihira had the most liked content!

4 Followers

About Sampei.Nihira

Profile Information

  • OS
    Windows 10 x64

Recent Profile Visitors

7,361 profile views

Sampei.Nihira's Achievements

819

Reputation

  1. I made a simple point of information. Always wrong conclusions.......... My personal emails in a more private and secure form do not use both ProtonMail and Tutanota. And of course I will not mention in this thread which email service I use because it does not interest the OP and above all it is info that will remain strictly personal.
  2. It is a privacy-related feature. In addition to the list of filters you mentioned @UCyborg other filter lists with these features are those of DandelionSprout (The most famous is Actually Legitimate URL Shortener Tool).
  3. This is clearly stated in the Tuta FAQ. I recommend that you read them: Have a good evening. P.S. I don't comment on javascript injection because I still have to eat dinner and I don't want food to get stuck in my stomach. You are right @NotHereToPlayGames here users have preconceived notions that are difficult to eradicate.............
  4. Try Tutamail. By default (but you then change) it uses password encrypted email sending. In order for the recipient to read the email and possibly open attachments, they must know the password you chose during sending. The recipient of course is informed (via client-email) that he or she has received an email. Obviously all this assumes that you have a browser (the email is read using the web-mail method) set up reasonably well from a security/privacy standpoint. In the image the email received. Without a password it cannot be read.
  5. Yes, almost everyone uses the same e-mail they have in their smartphone (Gmail). I include 2 more secure email services: https://proton.me/mail https://tuta.com/ It is possible to register a free account.
  6. My interest in scripts is specifically for security/privacy. So I block all HTTP website scripts in the browser. Almost all links to malwares content are HTTP. But with a simple rule in uBO you can do the same.
  7. Check if you are in this situation: https://www.ghacks.net/2024/04/23/windows-11-24h2-wont-boot-if-the-pc-does-not-support-this-cpu-feature/ to check the CPU you can use CPU-Z which must be started from administrator account: https://www.cpuid.com/softwares/cpu-z.html
  8. If any MSFN members want to test. Warning: The link in the image is an active phishing website (at the moment). So be careful and do not enter any data.
  9. Correct. But even in W.10/11 in many malicious websites with (HTTPS) phishing content (this is not often the case for websites with malware content) the certificate is valid and nothing prevents the browser (at a given initial instant of time) from opening the malicious web page without any problem. P.S. In fact, I would be curious to see how your browsers (on W.XP) would treat these web pages,but the test should be done quickly after I put in the phishing link.
  10. Although very dated might I suggest this test to evaluate the better/worse intrinsic security of Thorium vs Supermium? Perhaps the score is identical: https://browseraudit.com/
  11. @Felipefpl You are certainly protected if only your Custom filter list uses more Network rules and Cosmetic rules than all my filter lists. But I use UBO in Hard Mode + TLD's. An advanced mode of use compared to the protection provided by filter lists alone.
  12. Hi to all. In addition to ads you should also consider trackers. Here is why UBO should be used for its wide-spectrum blocker capabilities: https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Blocking-mode
  13. I have made only 2 posts referring to @XPerceniol. You, on the other hand, certainly wrote more posts than I did even in response to other MSFN members who did not have MyPal 68 as their topic. So try to be more sympathetic to the answers other MSFN members give to help others. P.S. Discussion closed. If you post anything OT in any thread from now on I will be there to point out this rule of yours broken by yourself.
  14. Right. This OT you wrote doesn't seem to me to be relevant to MyPal68,and moreover you intruded on a reply that N. was giving to a fellow countryman. So your rules apply to everyone but yourself?
×
×
  • Create New...