Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 04/22/2024 in Posts

  1. That's pre-release for Microsoft, actually. I need them to remove update block as I'm unable to work it around without a jigsaw.
    4 points
  2. Regarding Mypal 68, all related to localisation and internationalisation has not been implemented yet. No correct local times. No time zones. This was reported by me long time ago: https://github.com/Feodor2/Mypal68/issues/96
    3 points
  3. 3 points
  4. There are 10 types of people. Those that understand binary and those that do not.
    2 points
  5. I hope @Tihiy doesn't get upset with me for posting this. But I downloaded the latest pre-release build for 3.7.9. I frequently check to see if any new pre release builds are published out of habit since I have a little OCD about SAB since I love it so much. I have the pre-release download link bookmarked in my browser. The new build installs on 26100 without having to rename the exe and the classic taskbar is disabled out of the box. Simply clicking the toggle and restarting explorer enables it and everything works. Seems like we're saved! Update! More good news! Thank you Tihiy for continuing to support this wonderful application that brings such a lightweight and clean experience to our PCs! You are the man!!
    2 points
  6. How can I integrate this into Windows XP? Is there an installation file or a ready-made file that I can copy to a specific folder? Unfortunately, I am not familiar with this. This was just a hint that Elliptic Curve Cryptography can be ported to Windows XP. No more, no less. How this can be done, no idea. The linked project is not documented more detailed. But as you stated clearly, you like such short information. Personally, I do not really need such a port.
    2 points
  7. @Sampei.Nihira's favourite "Encrypted ClientHello" - is missing from this browser. https://github.com/Alex313031/Thorium-Win/issues/199 As it was introduced quite a long time ago, in 115(?) or so, how can we be sure it's indeed v.122, and not that faked old engine 115 from the old China port? @NotHereToPlayGames, what do you think? Alex. F. didn't respond, so far.
    2 points
  8. Is Chrome telemetry stripped away from this browser? Someone checked?
    2 points
  9. I don't have to prove anything to anyone, I only wrote what I saw a very long time ago, I don't have a github account, I don't follow what's up there. But someone who distributes cr*cks would logically want to hide the real location, no? BTW, the username is still very Russian, and his English speaks for itself. By this very logic you would demand proof win32 is from Canada, right? As for me, I'm 100% certain win32 is from Canada. Alex F., on other hand, well, you know. In any case, don't use the browser if you're worried. Solved.
    2 points
  10. No, we don't. You said: This statement does not refer to any cert stores. You have to stand by what you said. Maybe, you should correct this statement so that it can be assigned a Boolean truth value of true again. The evidence can be found in the previous posts.
    2 points
  11. This is a good question for addressing to @UCyborg. He already implemented some features which were previously only found in the webextension of uBO.
    2 points
  12. 2 points
  13. That's was all folks Applied to my new 68.14 you may check it already has been published
    1 point
  14. Is there a version of ProxHTTPSProxy that supports http/2 + TLS 1.3? Some servers don't work with http/1.1 anymore, such as discord.
    1 point
  15. I have done a test to check the behavior of the Paragon GPT Loader driver with the 2TB limit in an XP system configured in IDE mode. After formatting my 4TB Seagate ST4000LM024 GPT disk in Win10, I started to fill it always in Win10 by copying in a progressive way the files numbered from 01 to 432 until to reach 2,194,897,825,792 bytes (at the end of the copy I made sure that all the files were uncorrupted): After connecting the disk to the XP system with Paragon GPT Loader installed, I first verified again that all files were not corrupted and then copied a single file to the disk reaching a total of 2,199,889,600,512 bytes: Checking once again the integrity of all files, I noticed that the first file copied a few days earlier (the one marked with the number 01) was now corrupt while all the others were intact. But on the next system reboot, here is what happened: The problem encountered is almost the same as the one I detected using the asmedia asahci32.sys driver in a system configured in SATA/AHCI mode. The difference, which is no insignificant, is that at least with the asmedia driver, by following the identical procedure above, the drive was still accessible in XP and other files were still correctly available although the 2,199,023,255,552 bytes limit was exceeded. At this point, I also have serious doubts whether the GPT Loader can effectively work on 3TB GPT disks. It certainly does not work on 4TB GPT disks.
    1 point
  16. But I think you are getting us closer to understanding what's going on... I think the default values for .toLocaleString() are based on your various system settings: I have English (United Kingdom) as my XP regional country... . (GMT +00:00) Dublin, Edinburgh, Lisbon, London with Automatically adjust clock for daylight savings changes as my XP Date and Time Properties... And English/United Kingdom [en-gb] as my Firefox and Serpent language setting... This should default to: new Date().toLocaleString('en-gb', {timeZone: 'Europe/London'}); And I think that's the problem... it's all about the defaults values. Intl.DateTimeFormat().resolvedOptions().timeZone; ...will tell you your default time zone. For me, under original Firefox this reports: "Europe/London" which is correct. But under Serpent it reports: "UTC" which is plain, unadjusted, time. So now the question is, where is Serpent getting the "UTC" string from and why doesn't it get "Europe/London"? Ben.
    1 point
  17. not difficult to explain to me... i own a '55 Dodge and a '61 Studebaker...
    1 point
  18. That's exactly why I use Proxomitron but it is "too complex" for most people to "learn", they want something like uBO where "lists" are put together for them. Instead of teaching a man to fish and feeding him for a lifetime, web browser users just want that one fish to be fed to them one at a time, they have no interest in "learning how to fish". For example, the very MSFN page we are on right now has FIFTY scripts. My Proxomitron blocks 13 of them before the web browser even sees them (also why I do not need 20/30/60 uBO lists and my FIVE do just fine. I guarantee that my FIVE uBO lists coupled with my Proxomitron config is blocking way way wwaayyy more than those 20/30/60 uBO "spoon-fed" lists. ps - Proxomitron counts actual physical scripts, inline and fetched, unlike uMatrix or uBO which only counts fetched files.
    1 point
  19. My selection of Free Filehosting on: 2024/04/21 Add: https://buzzheavier.com (Size doesn't matter! - Unlimited retention) - Simple, Fast, Anonymous file sharing for everyone
    1 point
  20. I watched the whole video and what he managed to pull off is amazing. I know that he started backporting .NET Framework 2.0 to Windows 95, but then he saw that he could get all the way up to .NET Framework 3.5 which is one release before .NET Framework 4 (the last XP Compatible one). Now, I don't have Windows95 as my first ever computer was with Windows98SE in 1999 which is the one I cloned and I still run - albeit in a VM. The thing with Windows98SE is that it only really supports .NET Framework 2.0, so the real question at this point is: can I use his installer on Windows98SE to make .NET Framework 3 and 3.5 work or am I going to screw the whole thing up?
    1 point
  21. I think I'll try either browser on XP again next time when/if GPU acceleration makes a comeback. Right now, Win10/Win11 with all the background processes still have SIGNIFICANT advantage running Chromium on my (aging) hardware. Though you could also say XP hasn't seen significant changes in over a decade. But in either case, latest Chrome and retro don't go together too well. It's a bit like trying to get Grand Theft Auto V going on PlayStation 2. I wouldn't expect much on very old computers.
    1 point
  22. Thank you so much, that's great! Perhaps rather strangely as it's superficially so similar, that option does not seem to exist in Supermium.
    1 point
  23. as expected you know NOTHING about him
    1 point
  24. Why do we have to do anything at this point? Just ignore, it will go away.
    1 point
  25. Bingo! While it is a great thing for Supermium and Thorium to bring "cutting edge" browse-ability to XP, it is clear that XP is quickly quickly quickly becoming something only seen in RETIREMENT HOMES. You know, where the user has 40 minutes to perform what would only take 4 minutes in Win10.
    1 point
  26. A George King fan, his driver collection has been a lifesaver, but it's not the same -- the source code was leaked, many new exploits found. Update packs (past whatever Legacy Update installs/are already a part of XP Integ One Who Must Not Be Named) seem a bit like installing more locks in a house of straw. Posted from XP x64/Supermium btw.
    1 point
  27. You can't know that in general. Some lists, especially the well-known ones such as Adguard, uBlock or Easylist, are certainly better maintained than less well-known or private ones. But I can definitely tell from the download size that it sometimes decreases and then increases again. So, entries are both deleted and added. From time to time, I load these lists for the offline update of my mod. Therefore, I can't agree with your statement in general. It doesn't really reflect the reality.
    1 point
  28. What are we looking for? I didn't notice any particular warnings about filterlist incompatibilities. When updating filter lists in the legacy extension, you will see many entries in the logger considered invalid filters by uBO. At least, I see them.
    1 point
  29. In theory yes but practically no. And who will do that? As @UCyborg and me already stated, uBlock Origin is one of the most complex extensions. He called it rightly a "beast" that is difficult to tame. And it is hard work to implement or port such improvements from the webextension. And it is not even certain that they will work as expected.Therefore, we have to use more and good filter lists to get similar results in blocking at the moment when using the legacy extension. This is my assessment so far. We will see what happens in the future. In any case, I didn't get such ads you observed on the website www.ovagames.com.
    1 point
  30. @hidao : Refer to: https://msfn.org/board/topic/186133-thorium/?do=findComment&comment=1263668 that I posted already ; use a translator if the Release Notes in English is difficult for you to digest ...
    1 point
  31. To block most elements or objects whatever they are, you surely need more filter lists in the last legacy versions of uBlock Origin than in the webextension. A lot of filters are consindered invalid by the legacy extension due to the old filter engine which lags almost 6 years behind the webextension in terms of development. Open the logger and perform an update of your filter lists in the legacy version! Then you will see what I am talking about. In any case, I get a lot of notifications about invalid filters when checking the logger. But one thing I can say without any further proofs. You are using too few filter lists to block as much as possible with the legacy extension.
    1 point
  32. Just what I say. I use much more filter lists than you. Two of them you have enabled are not used in my installation. When I am back at my desktop computer, I will provide a screenshot of my current configuration for better comparison. What I definitely know at this moment is that in my uBlock Origin Legacy installation of New Moon 28, I have enabled 21 filter lists plus my self-created filters under the tab "My filters".
    1 point
  33. Yes, right, thanks for the warning, I almost forgot and was on the verge of posting it!
    1 point
  34. Then something's wrong on your end, according to @George King, and I quote. "When I installed Windows XP SP3+ (All updates until 04-2019 and .NET and Visual C++)" "it (Supermium) works like a charm." @George Kingwouldn't tell crap, trust me. https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/493#issuecomment-2067100117
    1 point
  35. uBlock Origin 1.16.6b1 by @UCyborg: https://github.com/UCyborg/uBlock-for-firefox-legacy/releases
    1 point
  36. Stop threatening MSFN members. If you are so disgusted by the collective decision of the Reddit's highly respected community to officially label it as "child pornography distribution", if you don't agree with the results of the investigation, just ignore those posts. And this matter is directly related to the compromised security of that browser and safety of MSFN members, consequently - it's not off-topic.
    1 point
  37. From what I remember it had a problem with saving from DuckGo. It save without the file extensions. I can be mistaken.
    1 point
  38. And you're welcome!
    1 point
  39. There was no misleading information in @AstroSkipper's post, and MyPal 68 works perfectly fine with that German DNS provider with no-logging policy. P.S. "N." word is a bad word, at least in the US.
    1 point
  40. OMG, that multiple acc. crap again. Report! What's stopping you, huh? You don't report because you know it's not true. We can't. You give dangerous, erroneous advice all the time, like this once again. People may have troubles with the police because of what you suggest, some countries have very harsh laws! The articles you attach, you clearly didn't read yourself, otherwise you'd see it doesn't work with MyPal.
    1 point
  41. This is for MS Edge or very recent Firefox only, therefore - it won't work with MyPal, this post only brings confusion to the users of MyPal. Besides, they acquire false sense of security with your unprofessional advice, thus they can get caught in a very unpleasant situation. Most importantly, it's even written in the supplied article, but you failed to mention it, why?
    1 point
  42. Not exactly true. There are publicly known ways of modern encryption to avoid that. Therefore, at best - they will know only the sites you connect to, but not traffic.
    1 point
  43. It's plane, not plain, so you lost.
    1 point
  44. Kiddin'? Astral Projection
    1 point
  45. 1 point
  46. Double post for some reason (probably hit post at the same time with you). Disregard.
    1 point
  47. 1 point
  48. I don't think those that play here would agree.
    1 point
  49. Different, erroneous spelling doesn't count, sorry. Everyone knows there are a lot of illiterate people out there.
    1 point
  50. Update notification! As already reported , the Root Certificates have been updated and are now from 27-02-2024. Here are screenshots of both updaters: Therefore, my self-created, offline Root Certificate Updaters in the section 11.2.4. Downloads related to Root Certificate Updates (in the first post of this thread) will also be updated as soon as possible. Cheers, AstroSkipper
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...