All Activity
- Past hour
-
@feodor2 released Mypal 74.1.4 some days ago. Today, I have installed it and made some tests. The good news: my favoured Alice0775 script loading method still seems to be working with this new version. The bad news: the Custom Buttons extension stopped working completely.
- 399 replies
-
- userChrome.js
- Mypal 68
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
modnar replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Is there any fix planned for new youtube idiotism going on (video picture shown for a split second then replaced with config error BS)? -
Update to Version Ver20250522 Update rootsupd and rvkroots. Change EXE from WinRAR to Windows Win32Cab
- Today
-
Dave-H started following List of new software unlocked by Second System
-
Understood, but @Tripredacus was consulted on this occasion, and agreed that no further action was needed in this case. That will not always be the case of course.
- 43 replies
-
2
-
- Extended Kernel
- WinVista
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Of course it did make a couple of very generic, blog-style posts to distract attention from the advertising goal, who on MSFN would do such kind of empty topics? No PC specs, nothing! https://msfn.org/board/topic/186949-starting-fresh/ In the good old days @Tripredacus punished for this, maybe even banned, since the bot no longer appeared again. https://msfn.org/board/topic/182109-windows-vista-modernisation-guide/page/2/#findComment-1226962 So my point stands, sorry.
- 43 replies
-
1
-
- Extended Kernel
- WinVista
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
douglaspicks joined the community
-
douglaspick joined the community
-
Working great now! Thank you very much!
- Yesterday
-
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
AstroSkipper replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
I haven't used these extensions for years. All modifications are done by me manually inside extensions themselves if they need to be fixed. And that means I am not interested in these two extensions at all. They are of no use to me. -
StartAllBack 3.9.18
-
released: bug fix for win32k.sys/CreateXlateObject
Start Me Up replied to Start Me Up's topic in Windows 2000/2003/NT4
Thank you. --- The update "WINDOWSXP-OTSKB000001-V2-X86-INTL.exe" has been released to the general public. The help file "OTSKB.chm" and the code comparison file "code.htm" have been updated accordingly. --- This update is for Windows XP (32 bits) users. However, in theory it can also be used by Windows Embedded for Point of Service (32 bits) users. However, it was tested on Windows XP (32 bits). No tests have been done on Windows Embedded for Point of Service (32 bits). Also, this update announces itself as a Windows XP update in the title bar during the installation and deinstallation and in control panel -> software. I know, this is not perfect, but it's the best I have so far. --- things to do: Windows Server 2003 update: add the version "5.2.3790.6946" of the file "win32k.sys" to "code.htm" add the version "5.2.3791.0001-V1" of the file "win32k.sys" to "code.htm" add the update "Windows Server 2003/OTSKB000001-V1" to the help file write the update test it release it Windows Embedded POSReady 2009 update: add the version "5.1.2600.7684" of the file "win32k.sys" to "code.htm" add the version "5.1.2602.0001-V1" of the file "win32k.sys" to "code.htm" add the update "Windows Embedded POSReady 2009/OTSKB000001-V1" to the help file write the update test it release it -
No idea I'm afraid, it's up to Shane the developer. 138.0.7260.295 R6 has been in pre-release for a week now. Presumably if no show-stopping issues come to light, it will become the first 138 release soon.
-
when is next new release
-
shiki0913 joined the community
- Last week
-
MichaelloPL joined the community
-
M1cha3l0 joined the community
-
Michaello joined the community
-
BooBerry changed their profile photo
-
LukasMartin joined the community
-
MarkizDeLU joined the community
-
Noahharris joined the community
-
Yes, I filed a complaint this morning (it was already "deleted"). Instead it's maybe better to use a PrivateBin instance. https://github.com/PrivateBin/PrivateBin
-
Apparently, pastebin moderation has approved nicolaasjan's yt-dlp log and yesterday's 403 error is now gone: ... Just something to keep in mind in the event of future pastebin uploads (i.e., they might not be immediately visible, for reasons only known to pastebin themselves ) ...
-
windows2 started following Internet Games no longer work
-
Returned again through an alternative server
-
released: bug fix for win32k.sys/CreateXlateObject
windows2 replied to Start Me Up's topic in Windows 2000/2003/NT4
Nice work -
abusesolvent140 joined the community
-
Firefox 48.0.2 / Firefox 45.9.x ESR on Windows XP RTM (and older OSes?)
jumper replied to Uncle Captain's topic in Windows XP
No one suggested that change. An appropriate substitution would be FreeLibrary: it will see the parameter as invalid, set the last error, and return FALSE just as a GetNumaHighestNodeNumber stub would do. Please look up the two functions at learn.microsoft.com to see why. -
j7n seems already figured it out, as thought it´s nothing special to draw/show a "new version" would provide that´s why specific data is like stolen from your computer like the OS, x32-x64 mode, browser version then their server refuse connection - while the code would work - while the display also would show everything (the trick to then display a false error message or making a crash is a old trick to try to hide the real concerns) so it was exactly what we thought the thing with bot´s are that they are not limited to a version - special these are getting upgraded and with "Ki-like" improvements they are sometimes not to detect either way so you have forum moderators to keep the things clean of something like this and there are bot detectors already - if these fail, very likely a version check also fails so i dont think its a security concern rather the common establishment of new versions (where they then have rights to login into your computer) its not different from the pedophile or terrorist question it is not made for that - its a gate opener for them (such as company interests - that dont care about privacy concern for example, or want to sell your specific information (what is worth up to million of dollars) as i already wrote in a different topic - they not doing that for these things they are trying to find a spot like "now win10 can happen, now win11 can happen" -> read terms of use -> if it not standing there no problem next terms of use its like a cut they trying to create this progress was seen over many many years for now - so they overtaken many many spots (and placed company interests - not pedophiles, not terrorists, no security concerns) and as i wrote at some point if everybody would have a webcam at home 24/7 you might find 1 pedophile, a terrorist or maybe even a bot but thats not what they really want the relation is far to off that it could be that the logic is far more simple -> open me the gate and yaaaa there could be pedophile, terrorist or a bot somewhere, wait did you say domestic violence ? sure this certainly was the reason now we can do this its a fault to think always from 1 to many or from a few to many thats part of their "trick chest" who is interested what that website really is doing, j7n seems to have tested it out: https://www.whatismybrowser.com/detect/what-is-my-user-agent/ oh i forgot - thats things a company never should have the right to do so - if something is going on its a police or higher concern you guys litterally give company everything about you - just if the right "keywords" are used and the companys have lawers, influencers also people at the police and politics - so they are trying exactly this somewhat somehow and something about banking - its not the win7 winxp users that have these problem - known problems who have this are happening in win10 or maybe now win11 (you can google how many data or things in this relation are happening like every day) and the majority are not the elders OS´s to say my clear meaning again these are not questions for company´s, these things are police stuff like placing a hidden camera (but then you would you say company come in ?) company´s are not allowed to do so ... but they are coming - hidden - slowly - and step by step more having these things - and this problem we just talked about is something like this - over what a such thing they place these things "open me the gate"
-
I was able to load forum.zdoom.org with User Agent Switcher in Supermium 132, but not in New Moon where it keeps cycling on "finished TLS handshake". The site is focused on an old video game. Having it require the latest software to work rubs me the wrong way, which is also consistent with their new versions require modern Windows. It is not essential for me to read this site. But I suspect how this may happen with more servers soon.
-
@jumper@roytam1 Unfortunately, even with your suggested change with from GetNumaHighestNodeNumber with to SetLastError, on Windows 2000 without Extended Kernel for FF36.0 and higher, It would still say "Firefox had a problem and crashed. We'll try to restore your tabs and windows when it restarts. Unfortunately the crash reporter is unable to submit a crash report. Details: The application did not leave a crash dump file". I would think it need updated wrappers like (2kdll, kernel2k, advapi2k, shell2k, shlwa2k, and psapi2k) to go up to Firefox 52.9.0 ESR unofficially on Windows 2000 SP4 without Extended Kernel I also managed getting Firefox 52.9.0 ESR (and Serpent and Mypal68) to work unofficially on XP RTM by swapping the ntdll.dll with the one from XP SP1.
-
Ahh. That's weird.
- 43 replies
-
- Extended Kernel
- WinVista
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Wow, thanks for pointing me at Classic Window Switcher, this is exactly what I've been missing for the last year! It works fine for me, but I'm using the executable to load it (though I did patch the .exe to include uiAccess="true" in the manifest, and I added a signature, which makes it work even when an elevated process has focus).