All Activity
- Past hour
-
Seems NEW TOPICS are no longer allowed to be posted here at MSFN. I know it's not just me because SEVERAL others have cited this in recent weeks. We have to reply to current topics instead.
-
ruthan started following ATI Radeon Driver for Windows 2000
-
Im trying to make some Radeons HD working. I made Radeon 3470 working fine with Black Wing cat 12.xx and last extended kernel , but i have trouble with Radeon 7350, i installed 12.xx drivers again OpenGL - Quake 3 and Unigine Heaven are running, but not DirectDraw Acceleration or Direct 3D, there is no Direct3D device present, same with DxDiag, probably problem with some registry Direct 3D device HAL definition. I have also some problem with Windows 2000 drivers in overall, for some reason when i load some drivers file i see just white area without entries where drivers should be.. and its different error than not compatible drivers where found, in that case i get popup with same error message. It seems that some drivers database or parsing is broken So i cant use Display compatible devices dialog and i can only use Search driver, point to folder and inf and let driver to be autodected, but i can force specific driver. There is also problem with Catalyst Center, old ATI installers have some standalone installer for it, but newer version have it embedded within drivers installer i failed to extract it from it. I also find out that some newer Catalyst center had less options than older version - so far im using Catalyst reporting this version 1.2.2314.20337 -from 2006, i dont remember which version its in ATI numbering.
-
TomP2 joined the community
- Today
-
angryduck22 joined the community
-
angryduck joined the community
-
Anyone still experience issue on cloudfare sites, that the verification check runs in cycle? (when recent Mypal runs on XP). Some sites do work even without any prompt for verification check.Even if I try to disable Ghostery, no luck. Example from Thorium the verification does normally work.
-
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
Ben Markson replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
The 153 error relates to the referrer header – Google have decided that when embedding a video you can't block it any more. It's worth noting that when these useless error codes appear that you can right-click ... copy debug info ... paste that info somewhere you can read it, and then look towards the bottom for: "debug_error" The 153 error will reveal itself as: "embedder.identity.missing.referrer" which is the clue that it is caused by a missing referrer header. Ben. -
Kxproject drivers "3550" on Win98 (SBlive/Audigy[10k1/2])?
Nokiamies replied to awkduck's topic in Windows 9x/ME
Good starting point would be trying compile driver with Windows 98 DDK (not SE). There is seperate version for 98 FE that introduced WDM support for it. It also needed some additional programs like visual studio to function. You should not need Windows HLK as Windows 98 had no hardware signatures enforcing. -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
j7n replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
I always thought this browser was for the tinkerer who expects it to break sometimes and then troubleshoot and revert. Are there any consumer level users for New Moon perhaps in China? I had a few extensions that I tried to transfer from Firefox 27 (looks the same as New Moon) and they gave me troubles. I don't remember what I did inside the files and after 3 out of 4 loaded. -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
Mathwiz replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
@roytam1 already told you no: ... so, given that response, I was only trying to help. I'm sorry if you find it too "inconvenient," but you have a workaround now. And you only need to inconvenience yourself once for each add-on you install. - Yesterday
-
You are right, of course, but that "exact and precise finite control of these associations" is in practice left for "advanced" users, not "average" Windows user "Joe" (at least that's how I see it myself ) ... Like you, I was introduced to the PA.com format many years ago, and, actually, after an "accident" that happened during my WinXP era, when sister ran a "wipe whole C drive" virus on then "family" desktop; after a Windows reinstall (no C drive back-ups were being taken at that time ), I had to reconfigure all re-installed programs from scratch... PA.com format appealed to me, because I could "install" many programs on a second, D, disk partition, where both the applications' binaries and their settings would reside; in the unfortunate event of a second C partition "demise", all my "portable" programs on D partition would survive... I think most take "portable" to signify "have the app's settings alongside the app's main (binary) files, not save settings in %appdata% and/or the registry"; but "portable" also means "be able to store the app and its settings/configuration to a suitable external storage medium (USB stick, ExtHDD/SSD, etc.) and be able to transfer the storage device and use said "portable" app across many different hosts, without permanently impacting (and/or leaving traces in) each host's fie system/registry/etc. ; this is why most portable app authors advise not to establish associations of any kind with the host system the portable app is currently running on; yes, I've come across very "smart" portable launchers that clean up the host system after the app has been exited, but that depends on the exact launcher; during the years, I have seen portable-application users associating portable launchers with the host system, and this has less risk overall, but, TBH, I don't do that myself either... Now I'm thinking of it, my advice "not to associate" was particular to the simple "Sm-Portable.cmd" batch file I posted previously ; this isn't a proper "portable launcher" per se, so if you clicked on a URL link inside a PDF file and expected that to be opened in the "portable" Supermium "Profile", then I couldn't offer an "easy" way to do that (you'd probably have to mess with the registry, and so on) ; and the "--disable-encryption --disable-machine-id" switches were specifically added so that the portable "Profile" remains unlocked and accessible/readable across hosts ...
-
Well, I for one certainly hope that metro uwp framework and immersive shell *NEVER* gets backported to XP, lol.
-
FFmpeg update. XP: static shared libfdk-aac VISTAx86: static shared libfdk-aac
-
thanks, I know it, but we're always patching the OS here and there to make it look like the one we had in the past Microsoft should announce "Windows XP 2026" with a compatibility layer +0 an option to turn ON or OFF everything released after XP SP3, so we can have any of these features on XP: - any WDDM version - sysmain/superfetch - WSL linux subsystem - memory compresion ( Disable-MMAgent -mc ) - video memory pagination - aero on/off, dwm on/off - metro uwp framework immersive shell on/off.... - an option to choose vista/7/8/8.1/10/11 taskbar version - gpu scheduling (HwSchMode) - control flow guard - spectre, meltdown--- - kernel features / version... this will be better than any new windows... in a perfect world of course... but this won't never ever happen
-
Thanks as always to a thoughtful writeup. I'll add my own slight additions. I myself have not "installed" any software for the better part of two decades, I do as much as possible via PORTABLE applications. PortableApps.com popularized the use of portable software. They began in 2006. WinPenPack has actually been around for slightly longer (by mere months, not years). You go even further back (by years) when you include those of us with familiarity to UNIX. With regard to associations with protocols/files/applications, portable software isn't really about not having these associations, but rather having exact and precise finite control of these associations. This PRECISE CONTROL is really only limited by the user's own intentions/imagination. You really can have this PRECISE CONTROL be as simple or as complex as your heart desires. Your "host system" does NOT have to have *ANY* 'default browser' associations, no txt file associations, no ini associations, no pdf associations, no mkv/avi/mp4 associations. NO ASSOCIATIONS of any kind. But you can mix-and-match to your heart's content. Associate 'browser' protocols (http/https/ftp, for example) to all use Firefox *ONLY IF* PortableApps PLATFORM is running in the systray. But roll those ftp protocols over to something like CuteFTP *ONLY* if LiberKey is running in the systray. Split your media file associations so that audio files divert to VLC Player, mkv files divert to PotPlayer, mp4 files divert to Media Player Classic, and avi files divert to TEncoder Video Converter. "Portable" really can be as simple or as complex as you "need it to be".
-
There is a heart with the native taskbar, but I do not have the new icons on the native taskbar to be able to do a direct comparison. I wasn't sure if maybe they deprecated the heart with smart charging. There is a heart in control center though.
-
There isn't a way to show heart there afaik. Or is there a heart with native taskbar?
-
IIRC, the "nonsetup" zip versions were created for "special" cases (namely WinXP machines without all SPs and/or partially updated), where the provided ".exe" installers wouldn't run; FTR, the first "*_nonsetup.zip" release asset saw the light of day with the 124-r4 release: https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/releases/tag/v126-r4 As posted by NHTPG, these are NOT "portable" packages; Supermium "portable" packages were once offered as part of a paid for Patreon subscription: https://www.patreon.com/posts/supermium-122-r2-103469536 If you don't mind the registry being written to, a simplistic "portable" approach would be to write a "Sm-Portable.cmd" batch file: place it adjacent to Sm's main executable (chrome.exe) and ALWAYS launch Sm via that (you can alternatively create a Windows shortcut with the same cmdline args) ; be mindful: "portable" apps are NOT meant to be associated with other protocols/files/applications etc. ...
-
Apologies, I've never used one of those versions, but I had always assumed that's exactly what they do, keeping the User Data folder within the extracted files folder, and not changing the registry at all (which is also an option on the installer version). Sorry for misleading information if that's not the case.
-
I noticed with the new battery icon, the smart charging heart on supported laptops doesn't appear. I'm not sure if that's intentional.
-
released: bug fix for win32k.sys/CreateXlateObject
Start Me Up replied to Start Me Up's topic in Windows 2000/2003/NT4
The tests on a Windows Embedded for Point of Service (32 bits) machine are complete and have shown, that the Windows XP (32 bits) update can not be used in Windows Embedded for Point of Service (32 bits). So there is a separate update available, now. The update "WINDOWSXP-OTSKB000001-V2-X86-EMBEDDED-INTL.exe" has been released to the general public. The help file "OTSKB.chm" has been updated accordingly. The code comparison file "code.htm" has not been changed. --- things to do: Windows Server 2003 update: add the version "5.2.3790.6946" of the file "win32k.sys" to "code.htm" add the version "5.2.3791.0001-V1" of the file "win32k.sys" to "code.htm" add the update "Windows Server 2003/OTSKB000001-V1" to the help file write the update test it release it Windows Embedded POSReady 2009 update: add the version "5.1.2600.7684" of the file "win32k.sys" to "code.htm" add the version "5.1.2602.0001-V1" of the file "win32k.sys" to "code.htm" add the update "Windows Embedded POSReady 2009/OTSKB000001-V1" to the help file write the update test it release it -
No, not really. That is the "this is not an INSTALLER, just EXTRACT and EXECUTE" version. To make it PORTABLE, you have to "wrap it" wit a LOADER so that the .exe doesn't save files outside of its own directory, so that it doesn't make permanent changes to the registry, etc.
-
The 'nonsetup' zip versions are the portable versions. https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/releases 🙂
-
Zhixuan joined the community