Dixel

Yes, you do, there were several reports of different brightness levels in CatsXP (no modifications, just running only on kernel-ex), ported Chrome 115 (mine), default version of Brave and even Ungoogled! Supermium is brighter than all of those above, also has thicker, blurry fonts. I talk about all fonts (including the UI). The winners are Ungoogled and Brave.

How then you'd explain it works (like it supposed to) in a normal Chrome 115? Unfortunately, I can't test both of 121 version, because I only have a self-ported v115 at my disposal. But then again, in older tests 115 vs 115, Supermium was also brighter.

Is there a requirement of always being rude? Was I ever rude to you? No. I can disagree with you, but I don't roll on you. With such attitude you don't attract normal people to join your monologues.

The problem with the author's modules are their poor quality. I had the same series, and their chips failed, even being in a well ventilated case. Their temps never went higher than 36 degrees (Celsius). It's human's body temperature.

DDR3 runs almost 2x times cooler, you can touch the module with your finger, it's barely warm. And those blue are packed up, wrapped up with some good aluminium radiators, simply an overcloker dream.

Good advice, but rather off-topic here and mostly valid/useful only for DDR2 and below. DDR2 is a very hot, extremely outdated technology from about 20 years ago. DDR2 desperately needs heatsinks if overclocked. especially,

Thanks, tried that, the white text is still too white, besides it has no affect on the Supermium UI. I have 16GB, no lagging was observed.

No ,you just missed his answer to my post. It was a very specific item we discussed - Kingston DDR3 (Made in Taiwan, the over-popular blue one - Hyper-X. HyperX is a series of overclocking RAM modules. There's no "usual" HyperX, it's hyper by the very definition. https://duckduckgo.com/?q=HyperX+RAM+Kingston+blue

Missed my post again, I wonder if folks these days read before posting. It's rather insulting to assume I didn't try all available drivers before troubling win32. I mean, it's me we are talking about, not a random github fella. "I tried other drivers, all the same." https://msfn.org/board/topic/185045-supermium/?do=findComment&comment=1259724

I tried of course, I also wrote about it, you've missed it.

Win32 always answered to my inquires, always. SO yeah, I'm pretty sure he doesn't want to drown in this {insert a word according to your imagination}. Take a look at the amount of your last posts here. Are they useful? Are they informative?

Look at the area around Skia/115 ...... It's noticable there with a naked eye.

Disagreed. Any comparison is only valid within the same Chromium version.

Please advice a better translation software for @dmiranda.

Glad I helped you, glad you're happy, please don't hesitate to write to me if you need any further assistance!

"12. Very often we see meaningless subjects in topic title. They give no clue of what the posts are all about. For example: Oh no! Help I'm mad Please help Question I need your help Hmmmm...." https://msfn.org/board/guidelines/

What's the purpose of your post rather than spam? No one needs your judgemental attitude. But then again, it proves what I wrote before. Reporting increased brightness issue is perfectly fine - it's not "complaining". Again troubles with the translation software? In fact, the brightness increases with each version, 117/118 was tolerable, 121 not. Ho many times do I have to tell you, dark flags do NOT change the font rendering. They simply replace web pages with inverted colours, or white areas with black. Fonts stay the same. Study, study, study.

win32 does visit it. Try to read before posting. It had already been posted https://msfn.org/board/topic/185045-supermium/?do=findComment&comment=1259720 No one "owns" threads here. https://msfn.org/board/topic/185045-supermium/?do=findComment&comment=1259793 There's no need to parrot what I already said before. Please stop inflating this topic, like you usually do with all others, too. https://msfn.org/board/topic/185045-supermium/?do=findComment&comment=1259723

Hello AstroSkipper, I didn't try to imply it's related to a specific browser. In one of my posts regarding this never existed for me issue, I merely pointed out to what it was posted from. roytam1 reported the issue again, on Sunday, (Monday?) Not sure about his local time. https://msfn.org/board/topic/185994-cant-edit-my-first-post-in-thread/?do=findComment&comment=1259650

Because in my opinion, Jody, it was one of the reasons win32 doesn't respond here anymore. I want to stick forks in my eyes each time I read numerous references glorifying 360 in Supermium's thread. It's no comparison by any means (no one can compare version 86 to 121), and even if it is (in your opinion), it's simply not needed for this young project. Would you like me to come to any of Firefox's threads and start telling how I like Chrome? Or "comparing" it in a way "We've ALWAYS done things like that here"? Or simply mention they can't work with somewhat modern sites? Think about it. I can't tell for D.D, we'd have to wait what he thinks about it.

Of course it does. Official "supported" drivers are too old for gaming, it may come as a surprise, but yes, I do game on my PC. But like I wrote, official or modded - makes no difference in Supermium's brightness, and I tried on another computer with another Nvidia card, also. Of which I notified in the edited post.

No problems for me, including posting random HTTPS links. https://www.pcmag.com/picks/chrome-edge-firefox-opera-or-safari-which-browser-is-best

I'm not planning to create a discord account, at least for now. But thanks for letting me know. I lost hope, it won't happen. Though, a small glimpse of hope still exists. At least with the new filtering system software that seem to have been finally implemented on MSFN against bots/fake posters/spammers. You mean, like this specimen, for example? https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/215#issuecomment-1918460518

For those having their GPU blacklisted for H/W acceleration, add. --disable-gpu-driver-bug-workarounds

Hey Jody, many thanks for the time taken! I run x64 Vista SP2 with a very old nvidia card Titan 6gb (January 2013)/ Driver version 382.16 (the last one that works good with it), thanks to @D.Draker for porting it! Supermium is terribly bright for me. I tried other drivers, all the same. Here I attach screens from chrome://gpu Supermium is terribly bright with thick and heavy fonts. While the usual Chrome is fine. Edit: I retried on another computer, all the same, it's brighter.