Jump to content

Dixel

Member
  • Posts

    1,681
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    108
  • Donations

    0.00 USD 
  • Country

    Netherlands

Everything posted by Dixel

  1. Usually sandbox is linked to the real driver, without it might not work. It's strange mfplat helped in this case. Did you just run your Opera "out of the box" without modding?
  2. What video driver and card do you use?
  3. Found! Generic bluetooth 5.0 is what he wants. "I can't even find Windows XP or 7 drivers for generic bluetooth 5.0 dongles on ebay." https://msfn.org/board/topic/185881-seeking-bluetooth-30-ud-300m-usb-drivers-for-windows-98seme/?do=findComment&comment=1259897
  4. I can take a wild guess, most are based on the same Realtek chip, perhaps that's what the OP meant. Several of these I bought in the past did. Most died very fast. Make sure they are properly cooled.
  5. Could you post screenshots? Thanks. 1 Before and 1 after the changes.
  6. Why does it matter? This topic isn't limited to "supermium on XP only".
  7. Granblue Fantasy: Relink – Special Edition v1.0.3 Genres: Action, RPG Company: Cygames Requires Windows 10+
  8. Right, unfortunately, looks like you still don't know. In fact, it's very consistent. If you took your time to read on-topic posts, you'd see - the our "pack", the pack of on-topic, polite people, like 66cats, for example, already explained in technical terms. https://msfn.org/board/topic/185045-supermium/?do=findComment&comment=1259864 Edit: Is there anything you could contribute to the discussion in technical matters/terms, apart from investigating/claiming "whose" this thread is? Thank you.
  9. Why would comparing it to something of relatively close versions be off-topic? Win32 declared officially, he started following the Ungoogled path. It's not when someone compares it to Firefox or 360.
  10. Looks good! That's what I'd like to achieve with Supermium, thanks.
  11. And because of that glued upon UI, Vivaldi is heavy. I don't want Supermium be like Vivaldi. I'm perfectly fine without that custom UI, in fact, I'd like to see a clear, de-cluttered UI.
  12. Answered this question for one millionth time, just three pots above yours. You'd probably see it, if reduced your one word or one emoji postings. Like "nope". or "" Explained the issues in details here and here.
  13. No, I'm the pillar of politeness, it wasn't me, it was Jody, something about "newbie format police". Wrong again, misinterpret what I wrote, clearly on purpose, to make me look bad, I wrote "your last posts here (in this topic)", and I stand by my words, as clearly seen by your post I'm replying to. What you oftenly write is offensive, meaningless and destructive to the community of MSFN. Look at you last posts, again. Think of how to try to be polite and friendly.
  14. Looks like another problem with your translation. Do you know what areal means?
  15. Both! But brightness is something that bothers more. Ugly, bold fonts are better visible here. Seems like you don't read all posts. https://msfn.org/board/topic/185045-supermium/?do=findComment&comment=1259724
  16. There you go! Finally someone noticed! Even on the poorly compressed screenshot it's still visible. On my good monitor, Supermium background looks like it's backlit with LEDs (cheap chinese bluish LEDs).
  17. I never claimed to have eagle vision, but my eyesight is fine. The screenshot quality uploaded on the website is automatically compressed, I have the original.
  18. You claimed to have good vision. Example. Compare the word "Brave" to "Supermium". Around "Supermium" we can see ugly, thick, red, blurry areals. The word "Brave" looks much cleaner. https://msfn.org/board/topic/185045-supermium/?do=findComment&comment=1252606
  19. Yes, you do, there were several reports of different brightness levels in CatsXP (no modifications, just running only on kernel-ex), ported Chrome 115 (mine), default version of Brave and even Ungoogled! Supermium is brighter than all of those above, also has thicker, blurry fonts. I talk about all fonts (including the UI). The winners are Ungoogled and Brave.
  20. How then you'd explain it works (like it supposed to) in a normal Chrome 115? Unfortunately, I can't test both of 121 version, because I only have a self-ported v115 at my disposal. But then again, in older tests 115 vs 115, Supermium was also brighter.
  21. Is there a requirement of always being rude? Was I ever rude to you? No. I can disagree with you, but I don't roll on you. With such attitude you don't attract normal people to join your monologues.
  22. The problem with the author's modules are their poor quality. I had the same series, and their chips failed, even being in a well ventilated case. Their temps never went higher than 36 degrees (Celsius). It's human's body temperature.
  23. DDR3 runs almost 2x times cooler, you can touch the module with your finger, it's barely warm. And those blue are packed up, wrapped up with some good aluminium radiators, simply an overcloker dream.
  24. Good advice, but rather off-topic here and mostly valid/useful only for DDR2 and below. DDR2 is a very hot, extremely outdated technology from about 20 years ago. DDR2 desperately needs heatsinks if overclocked. especially,
  25. Thanks, tried that, the white text is still too white, besides it has no affect on the Supermium UI. I have 16GB, no lagging was observed.
×
×
  • Create New...