Dixel

Same here! I use a China fork that has no memory leaks. I wrote to win32 with the suggestion to use it as the base for his browser, but he didn't open the message. Strange because he always reads my messages and responds.

Screenshots? BTW, like I wrote, it's about the overall memory consumption, NOT speed.

It very well may be, it's a security flag that isolates site's processes, but I didn't suggest it.

You're welcome! --process-per-site is very important since it consolidates all numerous processes from a given website into one, hence the memory usage reduction. I posted this flag at MSFN several years ago, I remember VistaLover was confusing it with another flag --site-per-process, they are absolutely different. Seeing the memory leaks are starting to show them off literally on every site now, I indeed think, try it. Out of Memory - Google Maps, then Crash. https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/847

They added a bunch of freshly released CPU-s, nothing major.

optional --disable-low-res-tiling --wm-window-animations-disabled --disable-highres-timer (I like it, but you wrote it's somehow not fitting for XP 32bit).

first and foremost: --process-per-site second: --enable-rgba-4444-textures (allow to use more simplistic textures), as I suspect the problem might be the images (their size) that Chrome converts to raw from jpeg. They wrote about that glitch in Supermium on github, too.

I can't believe Reinhard Blaukovitch simply gives out all of the ways to cra*k Securom, the CD protection of the company he claims to work for! Do you? It's more like an IQ test. Besides, someone with the same name hosts several pirating sites in the RU zone, we *of course* know that Russia had legalised intellectual property theft, but if you claim he lives in Austria, not Russia, how is this possible, then ? You're trying to say he simply steals from Austria, at the same time living there, which would assume he is a citizen, most likely... That said, his Chrome port is terrible. Good win32 didn't collaborate with that person (whatever he is).

I'm pretty sure it's not the same man, and the Russian simply took another famous man's name just forthe laughs and giggles. No one would ban the real Blaukovitch on github, not to mention the real Blaukovitch wouldn't post cra*cks on github or anywhere else, to begin with.

That's because websites simply load less scripts for phones. You're too low on RAM. I use a 16GB junk (low specs) PC with Pentium for the internet at home. It's the bare minimum,

Looks like you didn't pay attention to the post, the leak had happened with 64-bit Supermium. But then again, the function is glitchy on both - 32 and 64.

The reason lies around the PrefetchVirtualMemory and VirtualAlloc, since 110-112 the memory management code in Chrome was rewritten. This was the reason they dropped everything below 10, starting V110. PrefetchVirtualMemory (newly introduced function) glitches out on XP. The porters tried to replace it VirtualAlloc. No luck, as we see,

You can't compare browsers running on Win10 to any previous OS. I'll explain why. RAM management is different on Win10, it's the cause for the bug. They weren't able to fix it. The Russian guy (forgot his name, Blunauvich, was it?) he also acknowledged this huge memory leak, he couldn't fix it, then wrote about it to win32, the leak is still not fixed,

For the time being, try third party Instagram browsing sites, maybe? No login needed. https://www.pixwox.com/profile/INSERT_PROFILE_NAME_HERE/ Not sure whom this site belongs to, but works fine,

"I can confirm this as well. Renderer process commits about 2.5 GB on Supermium 126 x64 when it finishes loading that page, well above any practical 32 bit limit. Google Chrome 126 is even worse at about 2.75 GB. But then I tried Google Chrome 49, and about 300 MB is committed and the page loads successfully." https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/841#issuecomment-2322122240

I share everyone's frustration towards the "modern" web, though in this case the problem lies within the browser, even simple text directories have a huge leak. https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/841

I had those right from the start with all ported forks of Chrome that came out after v.111. I found a good China made fork which doesn't have any of those problems, but it doesn't run on XP, otherwise I'd given it to you a long time ago. Unfortunately, I can't be of help since I'm on a very long vacation. And making a further research is not so convenient from an iPad. As a quick fix, try to use the below command. https://msfn.org/board/topic/186133-thorium/?do=findComment&comment=1270805

This is not, but the official Intel Tracking Technology in processors is, and if you noticed, the article is almost a decade old, meaning even those ancient mammoth's excrement processors already had them including those on laptops, phones, etc. You don't have to "install" anything, it's already in the CPU and controlled by the browser. Did you read the links? It's similar to echelon. Not to mention, every PC has a black box OS.

What does it have to do with me? I'm asked to enter my e-mail (each time I log in) just as you, meaning I obviously don't have those. You confused me with someone else. Besides, I'm not famous and clear cookies.

Oh, and before you ban me, think how the alleged billionaire Durov with those 15officially declared billions can't even allow himself an own jet, and rents it? Come on, really? Now seek for Saudi Arabia Durov's connections and who funded all his projects, those all will link to Russia. He doesn't control "his" money, Durov is a simple boot (for those who aren't familiar with slang, it means soldier).

"Ousted" is the wrong word here. When someone works for the FSB, he follows the legend given by the curators. So, he simply moved further, onto Telegram, but then again, even Telegram gave out real people identities to the Russia secret police. There are well known ones among them, plenty of proof (even photographed docs) were placed on Twitter by those prosecuted. It's literally all over the internet. Some 7 years ago a Russian woman was granted political asylum in EU. I'm actually against those "asylums", those individuals are recruited by the FSB and planted to Europe. Clear as day play. Of course, there were ones that have nothing to do with the FSB, simple peasants to manufacture cases for the Russia police work. I'm sure we have FSB shills even here, on MSFN. Russia actually played very good in terms of polluting and controlling the internet, media and software. (Google founder born in Moscow, Russia, what else is there to say?) Never underestimate your enemy. Fun fact is Russia has zero of their own hardware, not even a single CPU, our Western tech is used against us. Very welcome to give me a warning/ban/whatever, don't care, but you asked yourself.

Intel® Identity "Protection" in Firefox https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/1076445 "Firefox finds many plugins that are preinstalled on your system... Intel touts Identity Protection Technology as helping prevent identity theft by allowing websites to uniquely identify your computer, which can limit access from other computers if someone learns your username and password:" http://ipt.intel.com/Home/How-it-works/identity-theft-protection"

Just one example, officially supported by Firefox, I'm pretty sure by Chrome, too. Intel® Identity "Protection" (Unique fingerprint in your CPU) Technology ‡ https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/97453/intel-pentium-processor-g4600-3m-cache-3-60-ghz.html https://csrc.nist.gov/CSRC/media/Presentations/Intel-Identity-Protection-Technology-(IPT)/images-media/day2_trusted-computing_430-530.pdf

I think Shawn Keene is being a bit misleading, Aero is not officially supported starting Win8, it was dropped to favour the absolutely flat "Metro" design. DWM in Vista and 7/8 can't be lumped together, they are different. In Vista mu idling GPU with Aero stays at 0%, in Windows 7 it's about 3%. @UCyborg , why?

Instead of linking to something from 2016, why won't you tell us about the latest Google "achievement", another anti-feature to be included in the next Supermium release? https://developers.google.com/privacy-sandbox/private-advertising/enrollment It has a mysterious name "Privacy Sandbox Attestations". Already there, in Chrome v.128, maybe even lower.