Jump to content
MSFN is made available via donations, subscriptions and advertising revenue. The use of ad-blocking software hurts the site. Please disable ad-blocking software or set an exception for MSFN. ×

Windows 2000

  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

  • Donations


Windows 2000 last won the day on September 30 2019

Windows 2000 had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

34 Excellent

About Windows 2000

Profile Information

  • OS
    XP Pro x64

Recent Profile Visitors

2,890 profile views
  1. In my honest opinion, I think that you should prioritize x64 work rather than x86, as x86 is first of all, harder to get stuff working on and secondly, less people use it by a long shot.
  2. You really are going to need a ps2 keyboard to be able to install it. Tried it on my own, but don’t have a ps2 keyboard and usb stuff didn’t work. I think your best bet would be to install it on the hard drive from another computer and then put that hard drive back to your ryzen system.
  3. Could newer nvidia gpu drivers work by any chance? Has anyone tested them or shall I have that privilege Honestly, so far that project seems like a pure miracle.
  4. The certificates updater actually fixed all the certificate problems on the computer. Thanks to everyone who tried to help!
  5. After adding the registry, the updates installed, but there doesn't seem to be any difference.
  6. I can't seem to be able to install those updates on the Home edition of XP. It says that they are for a different Windows version.
  7. Hey, so i just installed a fresh copy of Windows XP Home on a 2010 netbook, but I seem to be getting some weird web certificate errors which weren't present before the reinstallation. Is there a way I could fix this issue?
  8. Oh, right. It was a quick Google search and I must have misread something somewhere
  9. Technically, that would make the theoretically most powerful stable Windows 2000 system be with the following specs: - Intel Core i7-6950X - GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB GDDR5 - 32 GB DDR3 Memory That's of course if I am not missing something along the way.
  10. Not really. Faking the user agent goes just as far as telling the website that you're running a newer browser while you are in fact not. The trouble comes when a site has some feature(s) that are unsupported by the older spoofed browser and then it simply does not work or load properly. A very good example of that is when Chrome 49 gets spoofed to Chrome 51+ and as a result, YouTube does not work - at all.
  11. Yes, I was aware of that, but Google is greedy and their new YouTube layout works smoothly only with a Chromium based browser. Here is a rough explanation of why that is: [Click To Open Twitter] So really, using it on roytam1's browser is not a very good option regardless. Please keep in mind that I do not have experience with the newer and more resource heavy layout on older hardware as I have been using XP on a modern computer and performance has never been a problem for me, so it might not be as noticeable on older computers as it is on newer and more powerful ones.
  12. I'm positive that Chrome 360 is based on a newer version of Chromium solely on the fact that it is the only XP browser that can load the new YouTube desing.
  13. I am pretty sure due to personal experience that the success rate is 100% with the whole pascal lineup, although as you mentioned, only 2d acceleration is possible.
  14. Actually, I was wondering the same thing, but for Ryzen 7 2700x. Can anyone with any am4 processor test to see if Vista is a lost cause for those processors?
  15. I tried it on a Vista Ultimate x64 virtual machine and I was bombarded with error messages for missing functions followed by an App Crash followed by an error of d3d11 file missing. Unfortunately, it wasn't able to get to the browser itself after crashing devastatingly.
  • Create New...