Jump to content

Windows 2000

  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

  • Donations

    0.00 USD 
  • Country


Windows 2000 last won the day on September 30 2019

Windows 2000 had the most liked content!

About Windows 2000

Profile Information

  • OS
    Windows 7 x64

Recent Profile Visitors

4,491 profile views

Windows 2000's Achievements



  1. And now, there officially has leaked an early dev build of Windows 11, with curved corners, new design, new icons and sounds!
  2. In my honest opinion, I think that you should prioritize x64 work rather than x86, as x86 is first of all, harder to get stuff working on and secondly, less people use it by a long shot.
  3. You really are going to need a ps2 keyboard to be able to install it. Tried it on my own, but don’t have a ps2 keyboard and usb stuff didn’t work. I think your best bet would be to install it on the hard drive from another computer and then put that hard drive back to your ryzen system.
  4. Could newer nvidia gpu drivers work by any chance? Has anyone tested them or shall I have that privilege Honestly, so far that project seems like a pure miracle.
  5. The certificates updater actually fixed all the certificate problems on the computer. Thanks to everyone who tried to help!
  6. After adding the registry, the updates installed, but there doesn't seem to be any difference.
  7. I can't seem to be able to install those updates on the Home edition of XP. It says that they are for a different Windows version.
  8. Hey, so i just installed a fresh copy of Windows XP Home on a 2010 netbook, but I seem to be getting some weird web certificate errors which weren't present before the reinstallation. Is there a way I could fix this issue?
  9. Oh, right. It was a quick Google search and I must have misread something somewhere
  10. Technically, that would make the theoretically most powerful stable Windows 2000 system be with the following specs: - Intel Core i7-6950X - GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6GB GDDR5 - 32 GB DDR3 Memory That's of course if I am not missing something along the way.
  11. Not really. Faking the user agent goes just as far as telling the website that you're running a newer browser while you are in fact not. The trouble comes when a site has some feature(s) that are unsupported by the older spoofed browser and then it simply does not work or load properly. A very good example of that is when Chrome 49 gets spoofed to Chrome 51+ and as a result, YouTube does not work - at all.
  12. Yes, I was aware of that, but Google is greedy and their new YouTube layout works smoothly only with a Chromium based browser. Here is a rough explanation of why that is: [Click To Open Twitter] So really, using it on roytam1's browser is not a very good option regardless. Please keep in mind that I do not have experience with the newer and more resource heavy layout on older hardware as I have been using XP on a modern computer and performance has never been a problem for me, so it might not be as noticeable on older computers as it is on newer and more powerful ones. More smoothly than any other non-chromium browser with a spoofed user agent, yes. Also, neither the last official Chrome (49) that works on XP or the Advanced Chromium (54) support the new layout, even with a spoofed user agent. (The layout does not load properly and does not work, at least to my knowledge) Layout, to be more precise. Please excuse me for the confusion that I may have caused due to English not being my primary language. Right on point.
  13. I'm positive that Chrome 360 is based on a newer version of Chromium solely on the fact that it is the only XP browser that can load the new YouTube desing.
  14. I am pretty sure due to personal experience that the success rate is 100% with the whole pascal lineup, although as you mentioned, only 2d acceleration is possible.
  15. Actually, I was wondering the same thing, but for Ryzen 7 2700x. Can anyone with any am4 processor test to see if Vista is a lost cause for those processors?

  • Create New...