mina7601

@OldSchool38 From here: https://www.internetdownloadmanager.com/

Thanks

Yes, that's the website I located a copy of v16.26.

Correction: Process Explorer v16.26 is the last version that works completely on XP, not v16.22.

@sparty411 Yes, I agree with you. It's very impressive to see Chrome 102 working on XP, thanks to One-Core-API, which has improved a lot, and it's still improving significantly over time. If you're gonna test One-Core-API, I recommend a VM for this (for safety), since One-Core-API is still in development. That's what I do, and I report any bugs occurring when using One-Core-API. Consider One-Core-API a Work in Progress (WIP). @cmccaff1 I don't recommend using Chrome 102 for daily use though. As @K-BOX2022 said above, it has some main problems, such as: not being able to download files (yes, the last Chrome version [with One-Core-API installed] you can download files with is 74], unable to add extensions to Chrome. The latest version of Chrome, which is 103, doesn't run. Indeed as you have said, hopefully OCAPI will be more stable and reliable in the future. So far, I'm glad of the progress being made.

Hey man, I am very happy to see you again here, and it was sad to hear that you are ill. I never forgot you. Bienvenue, monsieur! (Welcome back, sir!)

Welcome to MSFN, @Linkv90! Hopefully you will enjoy your stay here.

So, I've rethink-ed about this for a long time and... Well, firstly, @jumper, many apologies if I am opening a closed discussion, I know that I shouldn't do that really, and that this topic is not for end users (but I did read previous pages of this topic, so I came to ask for help when I have already read what was discussed,), but I wanted to add to my previous posts on this topic. Secondly, @Dave-H, when I said "I guess I will wait for the full product release", I meant from this post. See the line "full release package suitable for end users."? That's what I meant/was talking about. I wanted to install the updates to try and run Firefox 52. I'm responsible for any risk I can get when using them. And lastly, whoever reads this post, don't take it from me as an attempt to start an argument, or be off-topic! I'm not trying to do either of them! I'm just saying my rethoughts! Apologies for you both if this wastes your time. Thanks for reading this though..

Thanks!

I just tried installing a Server 2012 R2 update (KB5010794 is an example) on 8.1, and yes, it successfully installed.

@VistaLover

@Dave-H Sorry to go off-topic in this thread and interrupt your discussion for a while, but are country flags broken in this forum? Suddenly, I don't see a country flag behind my username (and other usernames).

Lol, very true.

I am able to load postimages.org in Firefox 52.9.0esr, and in Chrome 49, it works, but it doesn't render the website correctly.

@IvanXP22 This forum is English only, so, write in English only, or provide an English translation along with your native language, so that people who read your post understand what you are saying. Here's an English translation of your post: "!! Help !! Help !! From this week I can no longer access Whatsapp Web with Windows XP with 360 Chrome Browser latest update. I ask for help and suggestions. Thank you Ivan" Welcome to the forum, by the way!

Generally, yes. But fortunately, Wayback Machine has archived the official article. Here's a link to the archived official article if you and/or @NotHereToPlayGames are interested in a look: http://web.archive.org/web/20101023015931/http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2401954

You're welcome!

This?

I enjoyed listening to this.

Unfortunately, they still don't work.

Yes, latest version of Chrome (102.0.5005.115) works perfectly. I run it in Windows 7 compatibility mode with no issues.

I should add, this only happens with the setup installer of the program. The portable version (zip install) of the program works fine otherwise of course.

Thanks. Here's the actual full list of missing functions for Process Hacker Nightly (captured from Dependency Walker): Process Hacker Nightly Setup: NTDLL.DLL RtlUTF8ToUnicodeN RtlUnicodeToUTF8N RtlGetFullPathName_UEx NtQuerySystemInformationEx Process Hacker Nightly Portable: NTDLL.DLL NtQuerySystemInformationEx RtlQueryPerformanceFrequency RtlCreateProcessReflection RtlUTF8ToUnicodeN RtlUnicodeToUTF8N IPHLPAPI.DLL InternalGetBoundTcp6EndpointTable InternalGetBoundTcpEndpointTable Here's a clarification of this part: Above screenshot shows setup tested in Feb 2022 KernelEx (Resource Hacker 5.1.8, 5.1.7 opens the setup, and installs fine). Trying it with June 2022 makes the 5.1.8 setup open, and then close quickly, and 5.1.7 gives "Access violation at address 00000001", just like @TSNH. (When he tested with CFF Explorer)

I have a request. Could you make nightly builds of Process Hacker work on Vista? This is what I get when I try to run it. I would use stable build, but it's outdated, plus, nightly builds are newer. (the last stable release was in March 29, 2016) I also don't want to use Windows Task Manager. When opening Nightly Setup: Nightly Portable: Here's the site: https://processhacker.sourceforge.io/nightly.php Of course after clicking OK on these above errors, a "stopped working" dialog appears too. Also, I noticed when running the Resource Hacker setup (downloaded from website http://www.angusj.com/resourcehacker/), it opens then closes quickly. In the previous release, it would open the setup, but just a blank window and unresponsive.

What a coincidence! I was also reading these stories often too! My childhood was somehow fun, I was also to computers very often, played a lot of childhood games, I even used to play this game called Demon Star. But, school was also annoying me at these times, too. This is really so damn scary, man. I got feared harder more than being cheered.