Jump to content

mina7601

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,894

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    24

  • Donations

    0.00 USD 

  • Country

    Egypt

 Content Type 

Everything posted by mina7601

  1. mina7601
    Ok, I decided to do something easier for myself: I put the file "ProxHTTPSProxy_TLS_1_3_1_5_220717_PopMenu_3V3.7z" to Downloads folder, unpacked it, then opened the unpacked archive, cut the folder "ProxHTTPSProxy_TLS_1_3_1_5_220717_PopMenu_3V3" and the file "READ ME FIRST!", and pasted them to My Documents folder. I will now test the program package!
  2. mina7601
    I was told this type of advice many times, and I am actually trying to follow it!
  3. mina7601
    Oh, thanks for this method! I will consider using that better. A lot better.
  4. mina7601
    @AstroSkipper Thank you for your reply! You mean you did not receive the "Do you still want to move or copy the folder?" message? I would, except the I prefer keeping the archive in the original name.
  5. mina7601
    Ok, so I downloaded the archive. Then I went to unpack archive, and opened the "Read me first!" txt file, and the first thing I noticed are 2 typos in the txt file: In step 3, it says "PProxHTTPSProxy_TLS_1_3_1_5_220717_PopMenu_3V3". It should be "ProxHTTPSProxy_TLS_1_3_1_5_220717_PopMenu_3V3". In step 4, it says "provide in this archive". It should be "provided in this archive". The second thing I noticed is: I download the archive to the desktop, and extract it to the desktop on a folder with the archive's name (which means, the archive's files and folders are extracted to a folder named "ProxHTTPSProxy_TLS_1_3_1_5_220717_PopMenu_3V3") Then, when I tried to copy the main subfolder "ProxHTTPSProxy_TLS_1_3_1_5_220717_PopMenu_3V3" to the desktop, Windows said to me: "This folder already contains a folder named 'ProxHTTPSProxy_TLS_1_3_1_5_220717_PopMenu_3V3' If the files in the existing folder have the same name as files in the folder you are moving or copying, they will be replaced. Do you still want to move or copy the folder?", I clicked Yes (without realizing both folders have the same name), and all the files of the folder were placed in the extracted folder, instead of having a separate folder on the desktop! You may not understand what I meant in the second thing I noticed, so here's a summary of what you should do to understand me: Download the archive, and save it to the desktop, extract it using the "Extract to" option, now open the extracted folder, and you will see 3 folders, and the read me file itself. Copy the folder "ProxHTTPSProxy_TLS_1_3_1_5_220717_PopMenu_3V3" to the desktop, and you will receive the same error message as me. This didn't happen when there was beta testing, because the main subfolder's name was different from the package's name (there were noUPX, and UPX subfolders in the beta testing at that time).
  6. mina7601
    Alright! Yeah, they want from you money to pay so that you can use all features of the extension. I hate that.
  7. mina7601
    I didn't try it yet, but don't worry, will do so later.
  8. mina7601
    Sorry to hear that.
  9. mina7601
    You're not alone on this, believe me. Sometimes my memory goes wrong and mistakes days sometimes. When it was Monday this week, I mistaken it as Tuesday, but then, later on, I realized the correct, which was that it was Monday.
  10. mina7601
    Thank you for the advice, I walk so often. I hope the same!
  11. mina7601
    Anyway, I want to say thank you for finally releasing ProxHTTPSProxy's PopMenu TLS 1.3 3V3!
  12. mina7601
    And yeah, if you ask me, not too much has happened when you were away, except me getting started with using roytam1's browsers, @AstroSkipper constantly improving his program package. and so on.
  13. mina7601
    Sorry, I misworded my post. I meant to say "this may not sound important to ask", not "i know i would be off-topic for asking this". Anyway, Yes, I now know! Thank you so much for your explanation regarding the theme you are using.
  14. mina7601
    Could be a forum bug. I don't think it has to do with the computer.
  15. mina7601
    @XPerceniol Hey man, you were away for a few days. Did something happen? I'm fine. Thank you, i'm already reading all of your posts on that topic.
  16. mina7601
    Yeah, the post I linked isn't a solution, but rather an explanation of why the installer version doesn't work.
  17. mina7601
    Alright. BTW, this is the reason why I prefer clean installs over upgrades. As @Dave-H has said earlier in this topic, it takes as long as it takes, so if not tomorrow, it can be later, i can wait!
  18. mina7601
    Yes, I agree with you! He even answered my starter question about me getting started with using roytam1's browsers.
  19. mina7601
    I agree with you, this extension helped me flag some errors in some words in my writings!
  20. mina7601
  21. mina7601
    @VistaLover I know I would be off-topic for asking this, but where did you get FF Quantum's (FF 57 until 88) beautiful (Photon UI) theme on your Serpent 52.9.0? I don't like the current bulit-in default Australis UI theme.
  22. mina7601
    That's strange, but I'll take it as good, so that we guarantee your program package is fully working!
  23. mina7601
    That's a lotta changes! Anyways, that's awesome, and hopefully the result of your testing becomes positive!
  24. mina7601
    Good to hear! Thanks. Thank you for testing.
  25. mina7601
    Interesting. So, there's still hope. I thought it was a dead end.
×
×
  • Create New...