All Activity
- Past hour
-
You guys are awesome 👍🙏 Fixed Many thanks
- Today
-
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
NotHereToPlayGames replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
If you ***REALLY*** want your video playback looked into, it's kind of ON YOU to do some LEGWORK in NARROWING IT DOWN. *Shoot the messenger* all you want. But that really is the reality of the situation. We (you!) need to tell roytam "playback WORKS in this month-day-year release, but it is BROKEN one week later with the month-day+7-year release". -
I think blackwingcat made TLS 1.3 indirectly available to Windows 2000, already. According to Wikipedia support for TLS 1.3 was added to OpenSSL 1.1.1. This version is downloadable from https://win2k.org/wlu/wluen.htm for Windows 2000. However, OpenSSL is not the native implementation of SSL/TLS for Windows 2000. The native SSL implementation of Windows 2000 is called "Secure Channel" ("schannel.dll"). According to Wikipedia support for TLS 1.3 was added to Secure Channel for releases of Windows 11 and Windows Server 2022. Another thing I just stumbled over is an update for Windows Embedded POSReady 2009: KB3055973 It adds support for TLS 128-bit & 256-bit Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) cipher suites. I don't know whether this helps in this context but it might.
-
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
Goodwin replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
I am using one of the latest amd graphics cards and the latest official version of the video driver for XP. Hardware acceleration doesn't work on XP and probably never did because mozilla only introduced it in vista. If it did work, the CPU utilization would be 1-5%. But that's another story, now the question is about CPU utilization. -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
modnar replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
What processor and you using a graphics card or integrated graphics? FF/browser Hardware acceleration does work in XP from what I see. -
Hello dear members of MSFN, WinClassic and users of StartAllBack+! First of all, this problem is not related to vanilla Windows 11. It is about a modification that adds the Windows 7 ‘Game Explorer’ feature to Windows 11, which you can find guide from WinClassic forums here. So what is the problem? It's simple. If you are using StartAllBack+ on Windows 11, the ‘Ratings’ (or ‘Performance’) section of the Game Explorer turns into white text. Here is an example of what happens: I posted this bug back in the day on the original thread but I didn't aware that I needed to open a different thread for it because it's not related to vanilla Windows 11 installation. So If anyone is interested or willing to help fix this, your contribution would be greatly appreciated by the community! Please feel free to post here!
-
- Windows 11
- StartAllBack
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
StartAllBack 3.9.19
-
Wanted to also note, that I have no idea why, but version 74.1.4 is very slow for me ... so I went back to 74.1.3, which is very fast, over all!!! My favorite version to date!!
-
74.1.3 version note says something about it being paired with version 102 at most, or possible 91. How do we do this? I have not ever messed with changing this ... Gorhil/uBlock's latest (1.68.0) requires version 128 or more. Hoping to be able to continue to use this product
-
This is a terrific software 👍 I'm having an issue running windows 11 25H2 - 26220.7271 Using explorer windows 10 style Each time I'm launching a new explorer windows i'm missing elements Then I go to taskbar manager ctrl+shift+esc and it comes back to normal Any fix?
- Yesterday
-
I've never done what you are attempting, I admit, so I am only going by "educated guess". We use Acronis at work for the task you are attempting. But it's also one of those things we only need to do once every 18 months or so. We all forget the process and have to reinvent the wheel every time.
-
Did originally. Forgot as time went on, lol. If it were me, my next step would be to uninstall your current version of VirtualBox (which I have to assume is "new") and drop down to the 5.x branch. I'd have to research further, but you want a version that PRE-DATES hardware capabilities like "TPM". Just a hunch...
-
Please read my OP entirely. Been there, done that. So what's the fix?
-
This sounds "too easy" of a fix, but I'll go ahead and say it out loud -- have you tried booting into "safe mode"?
-
I don't think any of these apps will install drivers for a VM when converting (I've already tried some others). Since I already have a bootable working VHD there is no need for me convert unless there are apps that actually redo the storage drivers to work in a VM which I doubt. Finding the non-compatible driver(s) in the VHD is the problem.
-
I could be one of three people still making update packs and addons for Windows Xp and 2003. This thread provided some insight into a problem I have struggled with involving deleting a locked file at startup. This code from my addon for the RyanVM Integrator did not work: [EditFile] HIVEDEF.INF,AddReg,Addline5 [Addline5] HKCU,"SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\RunOnce","apphelp.dll",,"%SystemRoot%\Temp\movefile.exe /accepteula %SystemRoot%\System32\apphelp.dll """" Normally you could use INF variables like %10% and %11% that would be expanded to C:\WINDOWS and C:\WINDOWS\System32 respectively, but these do not work in the hive files in the i386 directory such as hivedef.inf. Looking at the posts here I did manage to put the command in a batch file to get it to run at startup and generate the PendingFileRenameOperations value in the Session Manager key. Here is the successful entry in my addon: [EditFile] HIVEDEF.INF,AddReg,Addline5 [Addline5] HKCU,"SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\RunOnce","apphelp.dll",,"cmd.exe /q /c %SystemRoot%\Temp\locked.bat" This is the content of the batch file: @echo off reg add "HKCU\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\RunOnce" /v apphelp.dll(2) /t REG_SZ /d "%SystemRoot%\Temp\movefile.exe /accepteula %SystemRoot%\System32\apphelp.dll \""" /f Exit As you can see it is possible to include a path variable like %SystemRoot% in a registry value in some circumstances without it having to be expanded by placing it in an expandable string value.
-
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
Goodwin replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
I don't know exactly when the problem started, but presumably it's been around for a few years. Perhaps this defect was there from the very beginning, when firefox forks were able to play video on their own, without third-party plugins, as it was in firefox52. And I think you have already written about it in this thread. The problem occurs when you don't use mythical hardware acceleration, which as you probably know doesn't work on XP. example. on a particular machine: 480p video is playing - CPU utilization is ~20%. When changing the speed in the player, the CPU load increases to ~60-75%. I mainly use your basilisk. The same defect exists in palemoon and probably in all your other browsers. -
https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/115.30.0esr/win64/en-US/Firefox Setup 115.30.0esr.exe That's for Firefox ESR 115.30, I couldn't find a Czech version.
-
Or this -- https://backupchain.com/i/vhd-to-vhdx-vmdk-vdi-physical-disk
-
Try this -- https://sourceforge.net/projects/vmma/
-
I have an updated W7 vhd that I boot loacally and I want to now use it in a VM (VBox). Since the BCD for booting was loacated outside of the vhd, I used Winntsetup to redo the BCD as shown below. The problem is, when I use the vhd in a VM, it starts to boot, but BSODs with 7b. When I try safe mode, it also abends. The last entry I see on the console before the BSOD is Classpnp.sys which is a storage class driver. So I assume I have a disk or controller driver installed in the vhd that doesn't work in a VM which may be causing the crash. @JFX or anyone else that might know how to resolve this, or something to try, please let me know.
-
Is there a download link ?
-
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
roytam1 replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Notice: seems need some more time on ironing out front-end (win11) related revs from upstream which hopefully can be done in xmas, but UXP related changes are in and hopefully new build (without those front-end changes) will be available this week. -
ruthan started following WPA2 for Windows 9x!
-
Well it was at least discussed..
-
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
roytam1 replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
if you think the problem exists in my browser, you may at least try bisecting when the problem starts occurring. without doing so, there is no way to find where the problem is. and BTW Centaury doesn't share same UXP engine as my builds so it is incomparable.