Dave-H Posted February 8 Posted February 8 I agree as a general off-topic observation that while you do, of course, need to have a general awareness of security and privacy issues when working online, there's really no need to be paranoid about it. 3
NotHereToPlayGames Posted February 13 Posted February 13 Are any other Supermium users seeing this sort of behavior? https://msfn.org/board/topic/187750-sometimes-redirecting-to-spamgamble-site-when-accessing-msfnorgboard/ 1
NotHereToPlayGames Posted February 13 Posted February 13 Disregard... It's definitely not tied to Supermium... 1
modnar Posted March 13 Posted March 13 Just a heads-up: There are two security holes which are also being exploited that Google reportedly fixed a few days ago: CVE-2026-3909 & CVE-2026-3910. The new v144 probably hasn't have the fixes included...
Dave-H Posted March 13 Posted March 13 Thanks. Hopefully those issues can be addressed in the release version, although it will still be Chromium 144 of course.
cov3rt Posted March 17 Posted March 17 any information on near future support of supermium for windows 2000? the project has been going on for a while, but the only people who've gotten it work on windows 2000 is unofficially with unrealistic system configurations ( like the later versions of extended kernel that aren't so feasible to set up / get working ) and other custom settings, which even then doesn't allow it work well. i was hoping best case scenario that it can run on "regular" windows 2000 sp4 systems that have only say, update rollup 1 and mostly minimal official updates. it doesn't need perfect web browser functionality but anything noticeably better than retrozilla 2.3 / firefox versions older than 52 / kmeleon 76 browsers, as those ones have almost no decent functionality in this day and age, you know, even the most basic websites are like cut in half like google / fonts all messed up, security protocols that prevent most websites from even loading, and trying to fix these is just not feasible or do-able. i'd be happy if supermium could work decently if requiring only at most "Windows2000-UURollup-v11-d20141130-x86-ENU", which is one of the older extended kernels that sometimes get confused as something else but in fact is still an extended kernel variation, it's just that the newer ones ( apparently mostly done by blackwingcat ) become significantly different and cause more problems than necessary, unless installing in a very specific way, which may not be feasible as i mentioned earlier, and even then, the system may still not function well, so it's a lot of trial and error that may not work out well in the end. i wont be messing with going that route.
Dave-H Posted March 17 Posted March 17 This is something you should really ask Shane the developer about on GitHub. It has already been asked about last year, and Shane didn't dismiss the idea, but it doesn't look as if it's progressed. https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/discussions/1272 1
NotHereToPlayGames Posted March 21 Posted March 21 59 minutes ago, DrWho3000 said: where do i find latest supermium portable version 144 https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/releases/tag/v144-r1
VistaLover Posted March 21 Posted March 21 6 hours ago, DrWho3000 said: latest supermium portable version 144 There doesn't exist a "portable" version per se; I'll link you to a similar question you asked back in November and I'll defer you to the answers you were given at the time (among them, mine) ... 2
modnar Posted March 27 Posted March 27 An odd occurrence: yesterday evening I closed Supermium (ungoogled); a while later I ran it again and it wouldn't show the window (v144 R1).
j7n Posted April 24 Posted April 24 What are my options for disabling CORS (cross-origin policy) in Supermium? I know about the command-line parameters, which require a creation of a separate user profile on the hard disk. They do work, but I don't want to have a duplicate profile. I have tried 3 extensions, but they don't seem work. One extension refers to an "action button" on the toolbar. Either it is meant for an old Chrome, or I have hidden this "action button" because I don't see it anywhere. https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/cors-unblock/lfhmikememgdcahcdlaciloancbhjino?hl=en The site I wish to access is https://xythium.github.io/tidal.html for searching music metadata (no downloading of music). With CORS active, it does not work because a "preflight" request is sent out to Tidal which is denied. With CORS disabled it brings up music albums in the listbox and data about composers and performers.
Dave-H Posted April 24 Posted April 24 The extension's 'action button' probably doesn't appear on the extensions toolbar by default. If the extension is installed, look at the drop-down which appears when you click the extensions button (the one which looks like a jigsaw piece). There should be a pin icon next to the extension's icon, and the button should come and go when you click it. 2
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now