Jump to content

vinifera

Member
  • Posts

    2,058
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    2
  • Donations

    0.00 USD 
  • Country

    Croatia

Everything posted by vinifera

  1. by everest: ------------- Motherboard ID 11/21/2003-nVidia-nForce-6A61BA1BC-20 Motherboard Name Abit NF7(-S) v2.0 Front Side Bus Properties - Bus Type DEC Alpha EV6 Bus Width 64-bit Real Clock 133 MHz (DDR) Effective Clock 267 MHz Bandwidth 2133 MB/s Memory Bus Properties - Bus Type DDR SDRAM Bus Width 64-bit DRAM:FSB Ratio 1:1 Real Clock 133 MHz (DDR) Effective Clock 267 MHz Bandwidth 2133 MB/s Chipset Bus Properties - Bus Type HyperTransport v1.0 Bus Width 8-bit Motherboard Physical Info - CPU Sockets/Slots 1 Socket 462 Expansion Slots 5 PCI, 1 AGP RAM Slots 3 DDR DIMM Integrated Devices Audio, LAN Form Factor ATX Motherboard Size 240 mm x 300 mm Motherboard Chipset nForce2-U400 Extra Features SoftMenu
  2. dunno, I just typed in device name and "XP driver" into google there is one "flash" program (for HDD) on the transcend site, but it says it DOES NOT work on USB 2 machines and also HDD contains sensitive valuable data and I don't want to do flashing of anything just something that will make XP reckognize it
  3. the HDD in question is Transcend StoreJet 500 GB (USB 2.0/3.0) on win 7 (sp1) when plugged in to USB 2 slot, works at once, OS detects it via generic driver and all is fine but same HDD on again USB slot 2, but on win XP SP3, **** thing won't even get detected the device starts to do "beep, beep, beep, beep", nothing gets loaded/detected by OS, no response any idea why ? I tried to find some drivers for XP online but no success
  4. except s***ty performance even under sp2 I simply hated it coz of its clunky file manager and whole system wide ui 7 got better less cluttered FM, yet again system wide ui still sucks, but I guess with M$ you can't get it all finally 7 SP1 runs better to me than vista SP2, so why downgrade in fact if XP had option for scaling of folders/image thumbs to bigger and 7 taskbar (tho viglance somehow helps but it aint it), i'd switch back to XP even today
  5. did you play with windows metrics or DPI ?
  6. whats with 20 spam topics
  7. people simply became sick few years back in my country some kids tied a dog to hang up-side-down the tree and hitted him with bats till he died
  8. recently I see message by MS on skype that they will kill older versions and those who use it on XP is there a workaround or similiar alternative which is easy to use ?
  9. I was referring to 0.0.0.0 change in hosts file
  10. works fine under win7
  11. dunno if anyone here watches betanews but it seems a alpha build of 9 is leaking tho 2 louzy screenies given to me look fake and theres harsh debate at MDL it is fake even though WZOR did announce soon leak *** FAKE *** --- doubt winblows 8 will stand longer with .2 update it will be last one this (P)OS doesn't have bright future
  12. seen it tonight **** bright
  13. sweet
  14. unlock (patch) tcpip.sys then try again
  15. something I don't miss every day... that's IE
  16. flash was only example regarding Action Scripting, which also eats cpu cycles regarding .net, i'm on win 7 and also have only barebones which is .net 2 (SP2) and I never plan to install any higher in fact the only thing good comming our way is QTframework which unlike piece of shit .net framework, runs fast exactly because it is COMPILED via c++ and not some shit a** JIT
  17. Flash IS bloat. Waste of CPU cycles and INCREDIBLY inefficient. Its part of the reason why processors are getting more powerful - since no-one is bothering to write software that isn't glitchy and inefficient (i.e. Windows, Photoshop) you can say that case with any non compiled app anything made in scripts (flash, java) or stupid MS .net is waste of cpu cycles and unoptimized crap but who will listen ?
  18. if 9 supported youtube HD i'd stay on it somehow 10 and above became bloat
  19. its not even possible not using css every browser relies on it unless you want plain single colored website from 1990
  20. if it works ok, don't revert to older especially since older have quite some bugs
  21. ouch to above
  22. all I remember is win98 flying on 128 MB RAM and 550 MHz Pentium (think it was P2) now you need god **** more than 4000 MB RAM and at least 2 x 2600 to 3000 MHz
  23. thats impossible nowdays same as if you try force kid to stay away of cigars stupid brats will once get grouped go together and do shit with pc its even easier you have inet caffe's, classrooms in schools hell, my crap country now started to provide TABLETS into KINDERGARDENS !!!!
×
×
  • Create New...