Leaderboard

Very strange, I can post different links. I remember some users that were constantly posting random youtube videos were restricted, but you never spammed this forum. So, it's strange, indeed. As proof I can post: Crocodile Monitor (Varanus salvadorii) https://a-z-animals.com/animals/crocodile-monitor/

Good decision! Hi to you, too!

From what I understood, they want to power down the drive first.

I can remember very well that there was a problem with the sporadic disappearance of the Clean Links' toolbar icon in the past. This seems to be fixed in CleanLink2 as far as I can tell at the moment. In any case, I have installed this version and will see how it behaves.

I used Pure URL in the past. And long time ago, the extension Clean Links. CleanLink2 seems to be a fork of Clean Links. So, thanks for the hint! I will try this forked version next time.

Is this triple posting glitch back again?

The article is obviously old, it was a glitch in SP1, in RTM and SP2 - they do.

My thoughts exactly! That user even made a dedicated topic with pushing that agenda. link

As I already mentioned before, I can't confirm your issue with the logger in uBlock Origin 1.57.2 in single-process mode. Here is a screenshot as a proof:

Thanks for testing! I'm glad it works for you. But if you look at my screenshots above, you'll see that I actually have problems with uBlock Origin 1.57.2 in multi-process mode. And I'm not imagining them. BTW, I did a fresh install of Mypal 68.14.0b with a fresh, untouched profile. Maybe, this multi-process mode is not compatible with every hardware? Or do you use other settings for multi-process mode as your default ones?

Blame is not uploading, so what type of the crash do you get? The kind of crashes I experience is always an immediate closing of the browser when I click on links in my logged-in account on Codeberg. Some clicks here and there, and all of a sudden, the browser closes without any error message. And that only in single-process mode. I would like to provide more information but there is none I am aware of.

In Vista eSata can also be powered down.

First off, I so missed you, man! Let me hug you with my big arms! Be on your guard with the Group of Mean Trolls. The one in the hat already gave you a rather unwelcome greeting, despite knowing your situation! Try to ignore them, it drives them crazy. I'll support you with everything I can, please have a nice time, regenerate to the fullest!

Since I created an account on Codeberg, I get these crashes only in single-process mode, They occur absolutely randomly without uploading any file. It is enough to click some links here and there, and the browser crashes immediately without any message. And it never happens with the same link. Very strange!

Thanks for replying! First, I tried a basic installation, without any further settings or additional filter lists in Mypal 68.14.0b using the default multi-process mode. Only the pre-selected filter lists were loaded. So at first sight, all seemed to be fine. That means, to answer your question, the vanilla install works. But if I enable the default filter list AdGuard - Ads, all is over. Here is a screenshot showing this error state: Same when enabling the default filter lists AdGuard Tracking Protection or AdGuard URL Tracking Protection. Endless loading of these lists. The complete uBlock Origin installation becomes inaccessible. Even a restart can't do anything. The GUI of uBlock Origin's dashboard page is then completely broken. Here is a screenshot showing the broken tab Filter lists: Therefore, I had to uninstall it due to a complete breakage in accessing other websites by the browser. BTW, you mentioned my reported issue here https://github.com/Feodor2/Mypal68/issues/426. Unfortunately without the important information that this issue only happens in multi-process mode but not in single-process mode. Maybe, you can add this missing information. Is anyone here who can or cannot confirm this issue I observed? Regarding your statement that the logger doesn't work in single-process mode, I can't confirm that. Working here as far as I can see. Tested in uBlock Origin 1.57.2. Anyway! uBlock Origin 1.57.2 is fully working in Mypal 68.14.0b if configured in single-process mode but not in multi-process mode. I would therefore assume that something is wrong with the multi-process mode, or the default configuration of the multi-process mode is somehow problematic for uBlock Origin 1.57.2. At least, on my Windows XP computer, even with hardware acceleration disabled. Greetings, AstroSkipper

No idea, but I didn't manage to reproduce on my machine, I tried forcing Mypal 68.14.0b on single-core, kept multi-process enabled, couldn't break uBO 1.57.2.

People write it's dangerous Tutanota - "Either fraud or incompetence. No support. Hundreds lost. Absolute fraud. I don't know why I thought to go with these people over an established, reputable company. Can't believe how stupid I am. This company ate up ALL of the operating funds that my nonprofit had to work with, on what? Some bug? We never, ever agreed to this. Literally just signed up yesterday. Invoices are incorrect and mangled. If not intentional, VERY broken. Unresponsive support. SCAM." https://www.trustpilot.com/users/627cf4485f93600012c20263 Date of experience: December 09, 2023 More at TrustPilot Trustpilot. https://www.trustpilot.com/review/tutanota.de

Trustpilot. This what verified, legit users think. https://www.trustpilot.com/review/tutanota.de "Stay far away from the "free" version. I have both free and "paid" version. The free version should not be even offered free. There is NO protection from spam or phishing even if you signal each and every email. You will be bombarded with every imaginable unfiltered email that's out there. The free version is buggy. Ex, cannot send emails, cannot receive emails or they arrive late. Notifications often sent by Tutanota offering to "report" the problem but nothing changes. The spam rules (online) are confusing if looking for help and because your a cheepy who doesn't pay too bad for you. Figure it out for yourself!!" Date of experience: December 14, 2023

OT posts hidden.

Ok. As usual the proof is in the pudding. I have two partitions with Windows XP installed. One with POSReady 2009 and one without. I will test that and report here. I have just tested uBlock Origin 1.57.2 in Mypal 68.14.0b multi-process mode on my Windows XP partition without any POSReady 2009 updates. Same issue. When starting to load the filter list Adguard - Ads, all is over. Endless loading and uBlock Origin is then completely broken. Thus, as I already assumed, this issue is definitely not related to POSReady 2009 patches/updates.

SAB. When we tested upgrading SAB 3.7.8 to 3.7.9, the SAB taskbar was turned off when the upgrade finished. The upgrade takes about 1 second and when explorer restarted, the regular Win 11 taskbar was present. We just went and ran StartAllBackCfg.exe manually and turned on the taskbar. It used the previous settings from 3.7.8 and we had the SAB taskbar back. We don't consider anything in the upgrade process an issue or problem. For us, SAB works 100%. Jim

Ok. As usual the proof is in the pudding. I have two partitions with Windows XP installed. One with POSReady 2009 and one without. I will test that and report here.

Some bugs could look like that in practice. One program I work with at my workplace had an issue in the past where a specific function caused the crash, we noticed at some point during diagnosis the customer is using single-core CPU. It crashed on our test systems as well when we ran the program with affinity set to 1 core.

I wouldn't rule it out, if you have a way to test without POSReady. We (plural) [work-related] had several several SEVERAL issues with POSReady. Our IT ended up "banning" POSReady on all factory computers running XP.

I would like to use Mypal without SSE2 on real hardware (not VMs). I own an old computer (Socket A motherboard) with a Sempron 2800+ processor. I can run Palemoon fork by @roytam1 on it, even if it is slow. But the renderer engine of Palemoon is to much in late on the web standards. Browsers based on chromium are too much heavy and unusable on this computer. So it remains Mypal... But I don't use this computer on a daily basis and even less for surfing as I own many others computers. So If you are not interested and/or if that require a lot of efforts, I understand that and I would like to thank you very much for what you do for the community with Mypal. Regards

Possible. But I have ran both on real hardware on old laptop and from VM on fairly-modern hardware. I get the same results in both - Supermium is the only one pegging at 100% for 2 to 4 minutes, dropping to 2% for 10 seconds, then pegging again for another 2 to 4 minutes. I can only speak towards what I witness - and that is that Thorium works better, much MUCH better, on my hardware. Supermium can NOT be ran from a VM, the 100% CPU is far FAR worse when ran from a VM. But I suppose that's okay, we should be targeting real hardware.

As far as I can tell, it is Thorium that is behaving identical to Ungoogled Chromium v114 as far as fonts on Digital Spy. But I'm unsure if they are doing what they are being "told" to do (at least as far as the first issue, you seem to have two issues here). In any programming language, there is always a degree of "junk in, junk out". You have two things going on. First, your style sheet is MISSING the closing }. Your style sheet should read - from body {font-family: unset !important; to body {font-family: unset !important;} (note that the only difference is the } at the very end. Thorium and Ungoogled v114 both seem to add this missing } "for you". Second, Digital Spy &/or Stylus is not applying your style sheet for "body" to "body h4" (unsure what the official CSS guideline is on this). In your style sheet for Digital Spy, change it - from body {font-family: unset !important;} to body, body * {font-family: unset !important;} (note the added , body * so we catch not only "body" but "body h4" and "body h2", both being used at Digital Spy)

Thank you.

I always close this option

Yes, I used those two drivers from Win2003

Are you testing on a "real" system? Or an "extended kernel" system?

So, try to exit "USB Safely Remove", block it from running, reboot and try to eject the HDD.

Perhaps I went too technical there and did not get my point trough. What I try to do is help avoid people from making bad decision for their security or privacy. There are too many shills shilling too many allegedly secure or private services on the internet and unless someone does breakdown for problems with services and claims they may think they are secure to send anything, even data you you normally would not over it when using them. Point you think you are invulnerable is point you are more vulnerable than ever. I want everyone to take any promises of security or privacy with great grain of salt and not put all eggs to one basket.

oops, this is a false positive due to bad coding practice. problem is inside wintz.cpp and I finally got it fixed. https://github.com/roytam1/UXP/commit/92e1373e8c7dc28bcc715aaad0bd9558b11a7909 (EDIT: from my limited testing, it seems to be fine with AutoDST on or off, so no further change will be made about it)

Should work. Just remember that it will bloat your registry, so back everything up first.

What do you drive? I drive an "Ungoogled Jeep with Chrome rims."

But now it's over. Stop this kind of multiple attacks! You seem to enjoy twisting the words and statements of others as it also can be read from you in other threads, though. There is no rule that I have laid down. Stop spreading such untruths! I am very polite by nature, but I can be different if required. So, first read, then think and maybe then write something would be more advisable!

I am constantly helping others here on MSFN, but on topic. Just have a look at my multiple threads if you feel like! So, the imperative you used is inappropriate and irrelevant.

No. My comment and the measures I tried to motivate can be performed in Mypal 68 if desired. And if an answer has only been given for a specific country, it should be labelled as such from the outset. But unlike you, I don't constantly talk about things that can't be realised in Mypal 68 anyway.

Why don't you try OpenOffice instead? The last LibreOffice version compatible with XP is from July 23rd 2017, while OpenOffice is still XP compatible to this very day, in fact: https://www.openoffice.org/product/windows.html Here's the download page: https://www.openoffice.org/download/index.html Of course I didn't just limit myself to trust what they were saying on the website, I'm actually using OpenOffice on XP regularly and here you can see a screenshot with my XP running version 4.1.15 (i.e the latest version released on December 22nd, 2023. You know, between a project who deprecated XP years ago and doesn't really care (LibreOffice) and one who keeps actively supporting XP (OpenOffice) I'll always pick the XP compatible one

Before it was called Tutanota.