Tripredacus

Normally we only will delete accounts if a user is in EU and sends a properly formatted GDPR request but I do not know if that is what happened here. Another reason may be if the user had a temporary email domain on their account, as it says in the rules, sometimes accounts tied to those get purged.

The links post was "hidden" but someone quoted it. I don't particularly feel there is need to hide that type of information, We can find such things exist, and then others can post that it is false, a mirror (authorized or not) on github, or has bad/incomplete data. That is correcting the record and is fine. That way someone can know what those links are and not have to guess.

On some visits there is a delay on load of a JS that can cause some issues if you try to use the site too fast. Such as first visit, I have to wait before I can look at notifications because if I click that too soon, I go to the notifications tab, rather than getting the toast on the index. Sometimes when viewing a page, it appears loaded but isn't. As you can tell from the small address bar that shows up in the bottom or there is a loading animation instead of the favicon in the browser tab. This script delay seems to be random to the user, heavy users will see it more often. But if this happens when you attempt a reply, then it can cause issues where the client looks to be in process of submitting but hasn't actually sent the POST method, or sometimes it has and the post is created but the client didn't refresh, or it just sits there forever but doesn't time out. This issue seems more prevalent on browsers that are customized with some sort of privacy. For example. this doesn't happen running on Iron with no extensions running, but trying to run the site in Firefox with any security extensions is an issue. I think that some of the external script sources are themselves using external sources, an issue I've seen on other sites and this cause a partial slow load on some sites.

Here's the manual https://www.tyan.com/manuals/m_s5360_100.pdf It says 184-pin DDR 333/266 Registered ECC with single chip sizes of 256, 512 or 1024Mb. (their nomenclature) Whether an unregistered will work, it is not going to be a 100% answer because all boards and RAM are different. You can go further by looking up the spec sheets of the RAM itself and compare them. But my experience tells me that there are going to be some boards where using UDIMM on RDIMM is going to either a) work fine, b) not work, c) not work fine or d) cause damage. So unless you can find any post online of someone who has tried the same exact RAM that you have in the same board rev and they say it works, then it will probably work. But real world isn't so handy to be able to find that info, so you are likely to have to try it yourself to see if it works or not. I've also not experienced any situation where having an unsupported type of memory in a board has caused damage. Either with old Pentium systems or modern server boards. I suspect those instances of damage were likely caused by something other than mismatched memory, such as dirt or some other situation.

Post the board make and model

Spam service isn't perfect but makes things manageable. You do not know the horrors of the before times. Or maybe a recent situation a short time ago when the spam service lapsed for just a couple days and there were hundreds of spam posts.

So am I to understand there are currently 2 "fake" aka archived repos, and 1 original now deleted, and one scam now deleted?

Do not paste so much text into a reply, instead either make it as an attachment or post it onto another site like pastebin or host the attachment on a file share instead. But regarding the info you posted, Hardcoded Breakpoint shouldn't be in released software, so if the browser generated this message you have to go to the author to get it resolved.

This isn't related to the word filter.

It only effected companies who use the CrowdStrike middleware, the data files that triggered the crash in the CrowdStrike driver were not pushed from the public Windows Update.

I can't verify the link (the connection times out) so I'll have to take your word that you linked to the OS itself. You cannot put a link to a Windows OS on this site.

I would look into this section to see if anything is mentioned. https://msfn.org/board/forum/41-visual-styles/

About Me tab doesn't appear to get indexed by search engines.

Updated. We really don't need a reason anyways.

The user was banned manually and not put into the spam system. A post like that to impersonate forum staff is not allowed and that is why the post stays and the user is shown as being banned.

Did the user leave the conversation? I do not know if that is visible to regular members or not.

It was probably a spammer.

The topic was not locked. The forum was set to allow Members to create topics in Forum Donations but not post replies. I have changed the setting so now Members cannot create topics there. That section is only for the automated Donation posts anyways. That is the correct link. When the donation is processed, the forum will generate a post in Forum Donations with xper as the OP. We will see if there is a problem with it.

The owner has an account here (xper) but he is not a public figure if that is what you are asking. Xenforo is a fine forum software, better than what IPB has turned into. At least Xenforo works better with older browsers.

MSFN is owned by an individual in Europe.

Despite the message that said Teams would stop functioning on 1809 as of July 1st, it still does work and can connect with other versions (modern Classic, web, APK) of Teams on newer versions of Windows, at least as of July 3.

The current drive works in other OS such as DOS, in-as-much as it can run a DIR on it. If you read my posts it should be clear that this is not a hardware issue and I am not looking for hardware solutions.

Work computer has no updates, home computer has updated but not since 2014. Nothing is being done without my knowledge. Unless you are being pedantic, home computer gets definitions updates for MSSE but this is happening with my knowledge. My point is still valid, you can configure Windows 7 to never get updates automatically without registry hacks and impersonating a security context to modify tasks.

An update to this topic, there is still a problem but only in Windows. I have replaced the ODD with another and confirms it works in DOS with CD-ROM boot disk. I have also replaced the IDE cable AND even recapped the board. It does not give the "not ready" message anymore, but now it will either sit forever to read the disc, or the computer will do a hard freeze. It no longer created bluescreen if I try to read a disc and then eject it. Autorun on music CD will cause a program to open (WMP) but it stops responding. The trick of having the disc in the drive on boot up will make it show the disc label and icon in Explorer, but it still can't be read.

Some MSU may add a task like that, but it doesn't mean that all Windows 7 have it. Updates were never run on my Win7 systems, and no MSU I have added have put in a task for checking updates. My home PC has install date of 6/1/2013 and also has same settings as the screenshot above, and no updates were installed automatically.