Jump to content

Saxon

Member
  • Posts

    197
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4
  • Donations

    0.00 USD 
  • Country

    Belgium

Everything posted by Saxon

  1. In 2020, when Chrome 86 came out, it was fine to ship it with Web-GL enabled by default. Several years later, when numerous vulnerabilities of Vulkan, Swiftshader, Angle's WebGL came to light, it seems odd to still include compromised files, now knowingly. And according to @Dixel and @UCyborgall of those don't function or function improperly on older OS.
  2. I don't know who "Vista Group" are, I'm mostly on Windows XP and Vista x86, but rarely. I wrote about the new vectors of attack, after Chrome 100. Google Releases Chrome 101 with 30 Security Fixes for Windows... The most important one of these fixes addresses a high-severity use-after-free issue (CVE-2022-1477) in the 3D graphics and computing open standard Vulkan. Some other bugs addressed Four of the externally reported high-severity flaws are use-after-free vulnerabilities that impact the SwiftShader 3D renderer, the Angle WebGL backend (libegl.dll and libglesv2), the Device API, and the Sharing component. In the future, I'd like to ask you to restrain yourself from non-polite, personal, patronising, and simply not interesting off-topic conversations. https://otx.alienvault.com/pulse/626fd29366f581964bd2f839
  3. libEGL.dll and libGLESv2.dll have a serious security flaw. An attacker can load these libraries using WebGL and thus get around DEP. Explained here - https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=641630
  4. Update d3dcompiler_47.dll is suitable for Windows Server 2012, Windows 7 Service Pack 1 (SP1), and Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1. That's what Microsoft tells us. https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/update-for-the-d3dcompiler-47-dll-component-on-windows-server-2012-windows-7-and-windows-server-2008-r2-769c6690-ed30-4dee-8bf8-dfa30e2f8088 I don't see XP or Vista listed in this topic, no Windows 10 or 11 either!
  5. Here's the latest Fact-checked article By Kristina Jarusevičiūtė, which will help you. "Kaspersky antivirus latest review: is it safe to use?" October 2023. Fact-checked by Paulius Masiliauskas* "The Russian-owned company has been reported to be in communication with Russia’s Federal Security Service (FSB) and is responsible for providing them with real-time intelligence and identifying data of customers’ computers." https://cybernews.com/best-antivirus-software/kaspersky-antivirus-review/ *Paulius Masiliauskas is a content lead at Cybernews. An avid tester and spreadsheet lover, he currently specializes in website builder, VPN, antivirus, and password manager reviews https://cybernews.com/author/pmasiliauskas/
  6. Surprisingly nice browser, thank you for the discovery, I hope you don't mind I'll use it, too!
  7. I'm sorry. This is not relevant to the subject that is being discussed. But if you kindly use the search function, you will see: Malwarebytes is still officially supported for XP.
  8. I'm assuming it was Windows XP? Did you or your boss escalate the issue with their technical support? I got a full refund for their product, which seemed to cause slowness to my Windows XP PC.
  9. I put my trust in Forbes, it never let me down. Forbes is one the most reputable sources. There's no Kaspersky in the best 10 AV list, while the still supported XP version of Malwarebytes is being one of the "Best for Real-Time Protection". The article is free to read: https://www.forbes.com/advisor/business/software/best-antivirus-software/
  10. Chrome doesn't require those to be installed to run on any versions of Windows 10.
  11. Ever since I upgraded my Windows XP notebook to SP3, I noticed slowness, I tend to think it's the new SP that brought it. Dear guru @AstroSkipper, maybe I bother you for your current personal recommendation of AV? I only need AV, I already have a firewall, which is being the Komodo version we discussed here earlier. Ultimately, I'm looking for a fast and easy on resources security software, of course Kaspersky is out of question due to massive security concerns! Thank you very much!
  12. Of course not. Or you can just edit the accept header and throw out webp into the garbage, where it belongs..
  13. The original XP64 (2001) is not 5.2, and what you mean is the one that was based on Server 2003. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_XP_editions "Windows XP 64-Bit Edition". Not to be confused with Windows XP Professional x64 Edition, which was designed for AMD64/EM64T (x86-64) architecture." And if you want to be that pedantic, the developers of Panda wrote "Windows XP (32/64 bits)", not Windows XP Professional x64 Edition. https://www.pandasecurity.com/en/support/card?id=40003 The main point is that both 64 editions are clearly off-topic here. Have a nice day.
  14. The OP wrote many times, he doesn't honour any updates, doesn't install them.
  15. Both, Windows 10 and 11, are NT 10.0. Weird, right?
×
×
  • Create New...