Jump to content

Saxon

Member
  • Posts

    197
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4
  • Donations

    0.00 USD 
  • Country

    Belgium

Everything posted by Saxon

  1. I'm sorry, I'm confused, let's say someone copies this fake boot with italics, and it will work? I mean, will it be recognised as an extension? Please explain.
  2. Very questionable, someone can copy paste and try to execute.
  3. "GPU rasterization is disabled by default as GPU driver information is completely incorrect..." https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/226
  4. Interesting, never heard of such browser before, but it doesn't work with XP, does it? Also, it doesn't allow to install extensions from other than Indian sources. In the name of "security".
  5. 117 in the lead, sad it doesn't work with XP, I agree with @NotHereToPlayGames, earlier versions needed to be polished first.
  6. Yes, exactly! By all, I even remember there was a comparison of fonts in Brave vs Supermium, with photos.
  7. But these fonts aren't any better than others reported.
  8. I can't tell about Brave 121, but I compared Brave 110 vs this one, and Brave at least has no leaks, no crashes. But it's on Vista. I'm sorry, I didn't document comparison charts, but Brave was faster, and the UI in Brave is much better to my personal taste.
  9. I think I was one of the first ones to discover it, I had hopes for this browser. The heavy leak was there some versions ago already, probably from the beginning. That said, I have enough RAM, but it won't just stop. https://msfn.org/board/topic/175262-last-versions-of-software-for-windows-vista-and-windows-server-2008/?do=findComment&comment=1258182
  10. Huge memory leaks, check if you have VC, uninstall it. https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/204#issue-2104470031
  11. There's going to be a reservation of extra memory, don't worry. https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/190#issuecomment-1913340935
  12. Hi and welcome to this wonderful site!
  13. Try on another hardware? It could be CPU related.
  14. Explanations why the GPU process is blocked and does nothing. "Chromium disabled hardware acceleration on Windows XP in November 2013. The GPU "bug" that blocked this acceleration was removed a month or two ago, but it was more unstable than I would've liked (D3D9 completely broken, GL a little less). With insufficient time to resolve it, I restored the block." https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/200#issuecomment-1913945329 Fonts are really terrible for me, too!
  15. You claim peasant slang to be imperial tongue , well, go on like this, and I might follow this topic, boy. Hardware acceleration of 10bit HEVC {H265} is not available throughout the whole 700 series, except 750SE, a super budget, rare and outdated card. It's been explained here. As for 8bit HEVC, no one uses it anymore for encoding, no one, so nothing to play. I actually tried an old film encoded in H265 Main 8, it's choppy with this player.
  16. Indeed! WhoTracks.me's script puts a heavy load on my Core Quad computer bought for 2000€ in 2007, surely looks like someone who gave the advice to use WhoTracks.me has a modern PC with Windows 10-11. I guess 4000€ now is the same as 2000€ in 2007.
  17. Thanks, people there wrote it slows down it to a crawl, but maybe they don't have a strong core CPU?
  18. Thanks, very good advice! So far, I only tried on a laptop that came with Vista x86, it doesn't have that setting, but my MSI mobo does, it freed up approx. 348 megs, I also switched off the internal graphics, thank you!!!!
  19. I didn't, and I think I don't intend to. 3 or 3.5 GB of RAM isn't enough by any standards for the internet browsing. Supermium opens up a lot of processes. Wonder what they are?
  20. Why do you quote my name? We, here in Western Europe, do have several computers per one house, just so you know. I have at least 10, of which 3 are notebooks. Is it so rare in the US? Yes, I prefer x86 systems, so what? Running a browser with —no-sandbox makes no sense, it's against basic safety principles.
  21. Per your advice, I tried Supermium on one of my Vista computers with plenty GBs of RAM, but it has a terrible memory leak, it's already described with a photoshoot on the link below. For example, only one process (among its many spawned processes) uses almost 8GB of RAM! And it will go higher and higher, if left opened. https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/158
  22. This one seems too old, being from 2015. Nevertheless, it also claims to have "Downloads Last Week 42" https://download.cnet.com/proxpn/3000-2144_4-75218501.html
  23. Obviously claimed Windows Vista and Windows XP as supported. The developer site is up, as of this date. https://www.purevpn.com/
  24. I'm adding an alternative, the article (not me) claims it to be as fresh as late 2021. Total Downloads 117,646 For @VistaLover : "Downloads Last Week alone - 94" (assume it won't go offline soon?) https://download.cnet.com/purevpn/3000-2144_4-75617474.html
×
×
  • Create New...