NotHereToPlayGames

Agreed, same here. The whole "Trusted Installer" BS in Vista and everything higher is freakishly annoying!

1) I do NOT support "extended kernels". I do NOT support "POSReady". So I ignore all of those topics. So I guess I'm "thankful" if there are NO LINKS to them here at MSFN. But those "illegal" topics get a TON of replies and that has always made me wonder why those threads are not deleted/banned. 2) True. 3) Ah, did not know that. I used Opera 12-point-something a long way back, but that was before it was Chromium-based. I didn't think Opera was "allowed" to use open-source Chromium but then close-source the resulting Opera. But now that I think about it, MS Edge is doing the same thing.

How so? I mean, if we play strict and to the letter, then "extended kernels" and "POSReady" are both 'illegal', are they not? Unless I'm mistaken, Microsoft regards nLite's, NTLite's, and vLite's ability to "remove unwanted components" from OEM Install Media as 'illegal'. Nobody is being banned from MSFN for using or discussing "extended kernels" and your Opera "fix" is much MUCH different - it could become a shared fix on OPEN SOURCE software versus a shared fix on a CLOSED SOURCE operating system.

Modus Operandi

True. But I actually prefer to disable GPU rendering on my mid-spec'd not-new but not-old Win10 systems. I often need to screen-cap via keyboard Print Screen and video frames will not screen-cap if GPU-rendered. I also don't notice any CPU/RAM "improvement" by offloading that task to the GPU. Often times it's even the opposite, better CPU and RAM utilization by not offloading to GPU. That may have been YouTube only, to be honest. But screen-cap is everywhere, you can't screen-cap if hardware "acceleration" is enabled. edit - at least none of my Win10 systems will screen-cap if HA is enabled

Ewe wihl fined thatt misspelleeng theengs wihl getz muche fasstir reeplize. waka waka waka

I wouldn't go that far. Or are you just trying to poke ribs of "others who did"? I actually delete/prevent-creation of almost all files discussed in the past. But that setup is also *NOT* a "one size fits all" and that's where the problem was in the past. What works for you and I will not work for "others who did". And vice versa.

It's Bulgarian - but that shouldn't matter! I use v4.3 intentionally despite newest being v4.5.

I bite my tongue.

Does not effect me. I do not use "asset lists". In fact, I'm quite emphatic about not trusting such "lists", be it uMatrix, nMatrix, or uBlock.

You and D.Draker have the same view. If you want my view (and since you're asking questions, I have to assume that you do), so here goes. Are you familiar with a guy named "Binary Outcast"? He has (had?) a web browser project called "Borealis Navigator". Another project called "Interlink" is also originally his. He never made it to an official public release (at least not for Borealis Navigator, unsure on Interlink). BEFORE he could ever make it to an official public release, a guy named "roytam1" started publicly releasing the same exact project that went by the name of "BNavigator". Look at that name and I'll ask the same question - coincidence? Of course it isn't! This was when "branding issues" and "trademarks" and you name it were "debated" both here and on other "official" forums. Enter this thread! The same EXACT thing just happened! Somebody did not go public with a web browser and somebody else did! An open source browser. NEITHER one of these "somebodies" OWN the original Chrome/Chromium. Mod's to open source software does not make them closed source, this is against the terms of agreement of the original open source code that was mod'd. It could be easily argued that Binary Outcast's "toes were stepped on" when roytam1 started releasing BNavigator. And the same just happened here. But open source is open source. Else roytam1 would no longer be distributing BNavigator. That's my two pennies. Put them in a bank and they'll eventually earn interest. edit - this is just my "view", my "opinion". and opinions are like butts, everybody has one, that doesn't mean everybody wants to hear them. waka waka waka

No! Two of us were NOT infected and the guy that WAS infected has been infected in the past. So whatever the guy did in the past, he did it again and it has NOTHING to do with the modified Chrome that was shared herein.

Does uBlock at its default settings block the "fetch" from mega.co.nz? If so, that's why your mega.nz is not working. And are you comparing apples to apples - uBlock in 360Chrome and uBlock in Ungoogled 104? I don't know what uMatrix's "fetch" is even called in uBlock.

You could try this -- https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/downloads-overwrite-alrea/lddjgfpjnifpeondafidennlcfagekbp

I thought ALL web browsers did the auto-rename when you download the same file over and over. Even older versions of Firefox do this auto-rename. But not if you right-click and select save-as. Chromium v105 on Win10 - Ungoogled Chromium v96 on Win10 - Catsxp v110 on Win10 - Serpent v52 on Win10 -

i only tried one of the v111's. I didn't get around to trying v112.

I have them. And no, I am not infected with "TJPROJMAIN.EXE". I do not run any anti-virus. I only tried them in Win10 just for the curiousity of a new browser. I don't think you got "TJPROJMAIN.EXE" from this thread. (2/23/23)

Totally understand! It's one of the reasons I am not a fan of the "Tri-Five Chevy" (1955, 1956, and 1957). 1955 = 1,775,952 produced 1956 = 1,623,376 produced 1957 = 1,555,316 produced Compare that to Studebaker for 1955 when only 116,333 were produced or 1957 when only 63,101 were produced. But yeah, a bit OT, lol.

I'm kinda mixed, to be honest. I was accustomed to the great deal of flexibility with NM27 and then NM28. I only ran one of them! I only upgraded from NM27 to NM28 when one of my banking sites couldn't me made to work, despite all the flexibility. It was ONLY when NM28 could no longer be made to work on my banking sites that I migrated to Chromium-based. I continue to monitor the Firefox Forks and my fingers are crossed that I may someday return.

I guess what that tells me is that if people were as adamant about "security" as they claim to be, then they would NOT BE VISITING this website because it scores an "F" ??? www.bing.com scores a "D" swisscows.com scores a "D" www.google.com scores a "C" duckduckgo.com scores an "A"

NOBODY cares! And I do mean **NOBODY** Is it a "god complex" that hass ewe corecttinng evveryyboddy's speellinng missteaks ???

Following up on this. My error console does show this Content Security Policy error when downloading Mypal.68.13 which is distributed via mega.nz. Perhaps mega.nz WORKS for my 360Chorme v13.5 build 1030 and not for C...dile is that I block access to cdnjs.cloudflare.com that mega.nz attempts to connect to. I also have to allow "fetch" in uMatrix for mega.co.nz. At any rate, mega.nz DOES WORK even though that Content Security Policy is being displayed in the error console.

My only suggestion - do not "live for the like". If you seek something to research today, do a Google/Bing/DuckDuckGo/Swisscows search for "self worth tied to like button", rephrase it different ways, let the results lead you to other searches. Then after reading at least 30 articles, both pro and con to the "like button", then ask yourself if you should be worried about mina or legacyfan "liking" posts or not. Live well, my friend.

Said it before, will say it again - never allow javascript by default! This alone will prevent 99.9999999% of "security vulnerabilities". No, I don't know the "exact" percentage, but 9 nine's has to be pretty close!

re: cookie steeling This is one of the biggest reasons I have never understood why people want to "save" tabs and even logins from one browsing session to the next. And even complain that a browser isn't "portable" if their logins can't be carried between different computers. There are people here at MSFN that would "complain" that they can't close 360Chrome with a HUNDRED PLUS tabs open and wonder why their next "session-restore" would be SLOW because they WANT their next launch to open those HUNDRED PLUS tabs !!! Never made one lick of sense to me! I clear all cookies, tabs, cache, et cetera with every exit! And I never log into any bank account without that being the ONLY thing I do during that browsing session.