NotHereToPlayGames
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by NotHereToPlayGames
-
Then we are making up the rules as we go. We see it all the time, "Did you even use the search function before asking your question?", how is this game any different? When I play basketball, I follow rules from before I was ever born. When I play baseball, I follow rules from before I was ever born. You know I'm right, you're making up the rules as we go and then creating "logic" to justify your own paradigm. I'll go ahead and let @XPerceniol and @mina7601 cast the deciding vote.
-
-
With 69 pages, I bet I could find 69 "you lose" links. But nah, I'm not going to, lol.
-
You lose - https://msfn.org/board/topic/102111-change-a-letter-game/?do=findComment&comment=679048
-
You lose - https://msfn.org/board/topic/102111-change-a-letter-game/?do=findComment&comment=679101
-
You lose - https://msfn.org/board/topic/102111-change-a-letter-game/?do=findComment&comment=679293
-
You lose - https://msfn.org/board/topic/102111-change-a-letter-game/?do=findComment&comment=679240
-
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
NotHereToPlayGames replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Be aware that MSFN has an Inner Circle Gang that has somewhat of a "vendetta" against anything Russian (Yandex is Russian). I suggest everyone to do their own DD (Due Dilegence) and decide for themselves if Yandex is "right for them" or not. Run it in a VM, test for yourself. Personally, I have no use for Yandex. But I have never needed to so much as even try it, or Brave, or Vivaldi, or Opera (beyond Legacy v12), et cetera. -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
NotHereToPlayGames replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Snagit by TechSmith. -
I only use four in Serpent 52 (plus the one "theme"). To be honest, I don't even remember why I have Stylem still installed in my Serpent 52 profile.
-
Holy Crap! I thought my twelve was "too many".
-
My general rule-of-thumb is to NOT enable things like this until I have a regularly visited web site that leads me toward enabling.
-
Unsure if this is the "only" issue or not. But the :is() CSS pseudo-class requires Chrome v88 or higher -- https://caniuse.com/css-matches-pseudo However, note 4 also indicates that enabling the Experimental Web Platform features flag will provide support for :is() in Chrome v68 thru v87.
-
I don't have a Facebook account. Does the error console provide any clues?
-
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
NotHereToPlayGames replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
I'm 37 degrees Celsius everywhere I go. Indoors. Outdoors. Traveling. Everywhere. -
I'm on Win10. Both here at home and at work. Work would be a much newer version of Win10. Work is also Pro and not Enterprise. I'm actually "backwards" and use Enterprise at HOME versus at work.
-
Perhaps it's your ISP? I cannot find a QUIC connection anywhere, at home or at work. I've done nothing to disable QUIC in the test profile.
-
My test above was without any login.
-
I'm unsure if QUIC is being disabled at the "IT Level" as that test was from at work. I do know that I don't have it disabled at the "browser level", at least not here at work.
-
Cannot replicate here in the US. At least not in Ungoogled Chromium v114.
-
I do agree, unsafe, not for me. Don't care if it's Google QUIC or non-Google QUIC - neither is for me. But no, I did not vote, nor plan to. Some topics seem to only exist for the sake of Provocateur Extraordinaire - this one has already unfolded as such so I'll leave it to "you two" to duke it out, "not for me".
-
I'm not quite understanding the underlying hostility? The voting is 100% (at time of post) "I don't, and not going to. I think it's unsafe." so doesn't that tell us that you have both voted the same exact "it's unsafe"?
-
Mileage may vary, but I've only ever had a "noticeable" difference between these so-called "power plans" when on a laptop and NO DIFFERENCE when on a desktop. Again, "mileage may vary". And I had to really benchmark the far corners of the universe to even "see" the difference on a laptop. My laptops are i5's and i7's so I cannot say this un-noticeable "improvement" is true for i3's or not. I'm also HUGE into quantifiable measurements, a power plan "placebo effect" is nil to none for me, I seek quantifiable measurements. edit - oops, the title does specifically state that this IS on a LAPTOP my point remains, seek an actual "performance metric" that you can physically MEASURE, repeatedly, don't go by some "gut feeling" PLACEBO EFFECT. "I painted my space bar with Lightning McQueen Red nail polish. My computer has never run any faster!"
-
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
NotHereToPlayGames replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
The "normal" one. The ia32 and the sse are for very old CPUs and the i3 is quite "new" compared to what they are intended for. To illustrate, look at the "Features" section at the bottom of this page -- https://www.techpowerup.com/cpu-specs/core-i3-4160.c1767 -
You have 245! processes running. Of course it's SLOW with that much chugging in the background. My home computers (Win10) only have 60-some processes running and that's with some non-OS stuff. Here at work, I am over 200 processes but this is a top-of-the-line-at-the-time corporate machine with 32GB RAM and 16 cores with five Chrome's open with multiple tabs each, one Edge open for SharePoint, three Excel spreadsheets open, and one PowerPoint open.