Jump to content

AstroSkipper

Member
  • Posts

    4,577
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    496
  • Donations

    0.00 USD 
  • Country

    Germany

Everything posted by AstroSkipper

  1. Right! At first I would try to trust it, maybe one or two days, and wait a bit. If your deadline ended, I would try to contact by phone or whatever depending on how important it is for you.
  2. In my opinion it seems to be a temporary problem. That's probably the reason why you was advised to keep calm and relaxed.
  3. You forgot to say where you're trying to log in!
  4. Hi, is it that you are looking for? https://m.youtube.com/watch?reload=9&v=lq_jcGzonLw Cheers, AstroSkipper
  5. I had used ZoneAlarm Firewall for a long time in the past, long time ago. All versions of ZA v4 and v5 too. It was a good firewall at that time. But it was never a very stable and reliable one. Some versions were more stable, others less. Nowadays I wouldn't use any of these versions. The reason is there are much more better firewall solutions available, more stable and more recent without the problems I had to observe in the case of ZA. Some connections were not really blocked contrary to my settings. A lot of hanging at startup and so on. In those days I replaced ZA by Sygate Personal Firewall Professional which was much better than ZA. But for me, all these solutions are obsolete. The best firewall I have ever used is definitely Windows 10 Firewall Control XP Plus 7.5. No problems, no hanging and no unwanted connections anymore. So, spoken for me only, I have to say: Bye, Bye, ZA and all old not always properly working firewall solutions! And rest in peace! Cheers, AstroSkipper PS: Regarding to security solutions generally, the property "more recent" is very important due to changes in establishing secure connections, structure of internet and existing threats!
  6. On a clean install try only http-links! Here is the link for Serpent 52: http://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win32-git-20220528-3219d2d-uxp-0855ba43d-xpmod.7z Cheers, AstroSkipper A clean installation of Windows XP is very different depending on the source you used to install from. Truth be told I don't really understand your problem. If the download of a browser installation file doesn't work in your system, you should download it by using another system, your smartphone or your tablet. And then you simply transfer it to your target system. By the way each browser of roytam1's editions will do a good, first job to download further necessary files. I don't need to do that because my download archive contains all important files to install whatever I desire. And furthermore a clean, native installation of Windows XP will lack of the ability to establish system connections using modern protocols and ciphers. In such a case one of the proxies ProxHTTPSProxy or HTTPSProxy will be necessary to establish such connections system-widely. Cheers, AstroSkipper
  7. On a clean install try only http-links! Here is the link for Serpent 52: http://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win32-git-20220528-3219d2d-uxp-0855ba43d-xpmod.7z Cheers, AstroSkipper
  8. Hi @XPerceniol, I wish you sincerely the very best and that the future will take a positive turn for you. Kind regards, AstroSkipper
  9. Solution for the error code 0x80072f8f while accessing the WU/MU website using ProxHTTPSProxy or HTTPSProxy You have to install ProxHTTPSProxy's or HTTPSProxy's CA certificate to Trusted Root Certification Authority under the account local computer. A detailed instruction can be found in my original post: and in my article "ProxHTTPSProxy and HTTPSProxy in Windows XP for future use" under section Configuration → Configuration of these proxies to access the MU website successfully nowadays: Cheers, AstroSkipper
  10. Thanks for your reply and your wish! If you knew a person with Python programming skills, it would be great. Three TLS 1.3 ciphers have to be added to existing package of REV3e. Its openssl version 1.1.1d already supports TLS 1.3. In case of ProxHTTPSProxyMII 1.3a (20150527) much more needs to be done to implement TLS 1.3 support. I can only do what I am able to, regarding my skills. Unfortunately I am not a Python programmer. Sorry! Cheers, AstroSkipper
  11. Registry Editors Registrar Registry Manager 9.20 is a registry editor which is still supported in Windows XP. Hompage: https://www.resplendence.com/registrar There is a Free Home Edition: https://www.resplendence.com/download/RegistrarHomeV9.exe and a commercial Professional Edition. My favourite registry editor is Registry Workshop (current version is 5.0.1). Link: http://www.torchsoft.com/en/rw_information.html It is still supported in Windows XP, but it's commercial. This program is definitely worth its money. You can try it 30 days for free. Here is a download link of the English version 5.0.1 (other language versions are available): http://www.torchsoft.com/download/RegistryWorkshop.exe Cheers, AstroSkipper
  12. Sphinx Windows 10 Firewall Control XP 7.5 is the last working version in Windows XP. There are two interesting versions: The free version Windows 10 Firewall Control XP Free 7.5: https://www.sphinx-soft.com/download/W10FC7.5/Windows10FirewallControlFree-XP-Setup.exe and the paid Plus version Windows 10 Firewall Control XP Plus 7.5: https://www.sphinx-soft.com/download/W10FC7.5/Windows10FirewallControlPlus-XP-Setup.exe The paid Plus version is definitely worth its money. I use it for years and for me it is the best firewall solution in Windows XP. Here is a link from December of 2015 where you can compare the Free and the Plus version: https://web.archive.org/web/20151229143305/https://www.sphinx-soft.com/Vista/order.html A key for Windows 10 Firewall Control XP Plus has to be requested by contacting the support because it is no longer offered officially. I mention this due to the circumstance that a regular key doesn't work with the XP version. Cheers, AstroSkipper
  13. Thanks for sharing! Works fine in New Moon 28.10.3a1. You're welcome! The goal of all this is to restore and preserve important functionality in Windows XP for daily and future use. And access to VirusTotal is definitely important. Kind regards, AstroSkipper
  14. Yeah, you're right! Probability of using 360Chrome v11: for @XPerceniol 50% and for @AstroSkipper 50% too. That's a classical Laplace distribution! Of course, my favourite pants! Never worn any other pants!
  15. This version is already available as an English release in Humming Owl's thread: Cheers, AstroSkipper
  16. Hi to all people who are using a computer with a SSE only CPU or whose OS is Windows XP Professional 64Bit! In these cases you have to use the original release of ProxHTTPSProxyMII 1.3a (20150527), when you need to establish such a connection. Now I would like to know whether there is an interest in an updated and modified package of this version. One of my computers has an AthonXP 3200+ CPU with SSE instruction set only and therefore I have modified the mentioned package by including a launcher as it is in HTTPSProxy's package. The result is a proxy which can be served in the same way as it is in case of HTTPSProxy. All functions are available via systray icon and can be accessed comfortably. Let me know by commenting and reacting whether there is such an interest! Kind regards, AstroSkipper
  17. To surf anonymously , to get an IP from another country or to gain access to sites which are restricted in my country I use paid VPN services with no log policy. I try to trust them. And so far I am very happy with that. Cheers, AstroSkipper
  18. Hi @XPerceniol, I use PDF-XChange Viewer for years and it's working fine in Windows XP. Comparing to Adobe it is lightweight and you have editing function. It can be integrated into browsers by its provided plugin. Have a look here: Cheers, AstroSkipper
  19. Ok, I found the cause of this problem. The extension Download Manager (S3) 5.1.4 prevents showing the hash in 360Chrome v11. This extension has either to be uninstalled or disabled if accessing virustotal.com. Same in Mypal 68. Cheers, AstroSkipper
  20. Ok, I found the cause of this problem. The extension Download Manager (S3) 5.1.4 prevents showing the hash in 360Chrome v11. This extension has either to be uninstalled or disabled if accessing virustotal.com. Cheers, AstroSkipper
  21. Hi @NotHereToPlayGames, VirusTotal has changed its interface. A lot of old browsers didn't work anymore with VT's new interface. I could fix it in @roytam1's browsers and in @feodor2 Mypal 68 by setting variable dom.moduleScripts.enabled to false in about:config. Have a look in this post: The browsers Mypal 68, New Moon 28 and Serpent 52 are working properly with VT's new interface in Windows XP. Unfortunately the Chrome browsers 360Chrome v11 and 360Chrome v13 are not working with the new interface of virustotal.com. Loading of the new interface works, a file can be uploaded, the hash is generated, but the results (Checking hash) are not shown. I tried to change some script related flags, but without any success. I already know that there is a link for old browsers: https://www.virustotal.com/old-browsers/, but for external tools or browser add-ons only the new interface is important and will work. Any ideas how this could be fixed in your 360Chrome browsers? Cheers, AstroSkipper
  22. And following tools are working again with the new interface of virustotal.com in Windows XP: VirusTotal Uploader 2.2 and Winja VirusTotal Uploader 7.1. Here are the download links: https://www.virustotal.com/static/bin/vtuploader2.2.exe , https://www.majorgeeks.com/files/details/winja.html Kind regards, AstroSkipper
  23. I can confirm that following browsers are working with the new interface of virustotal.com if variable dom.moduleScripts.enabled is set to false in about:config: Mypal 68, New Moon 28 and Serpent 52. Firefox 52.9.0esr is natively working with the new interface of virustotal.com, presumably because of lacking this variable dom.moduleScripts.enabled. Unfortunately the Chrome browsers 360Chrome v11 and 360Chrome v13 are not working with the new interface of virustotal.com. I tried to change some script related flags, but without any success. Cheers, AstroSkipper
  24. And here is a link from December of 2015 where you can compare the Free and the Plus version: https://web.archive.org/web/20151229143305/https://www.sphinx-soft.com/Vista/order.html Have a nice day, AstroSkipper
  25. The portable version is not compatible with Windows XP. Only the versions ending in their name on XP are written for Windows XP. This is the free version for Windows XP: https://www.sphinx-soft.com/download/W10FC7.5/Windows10FirewallControlFree-XP-Setup.exe And this is the Plus (paid) version for Windows XP: https://www.sphinx-soft.com/download/W10FC7.5/Windows10FirewallControlPlus-XP-Setup.exe The Plus version is the one I use for years. It's definitely worth the money. I wouldn't use a portable version in case of a firewall. There are components which have to be installed in Windows sytem folder, otherwise the services couldn't start at Windows startup. The goal of a firewall must be in managing and controlling all connections, especially at system startup. A firewall should be deeply integrated into the system. Therefore a portable version isn't a good idea. Cheers, AstroSkipper
×
×
  • Create New...