Jump to content

AstroSkipper

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    4,581

  • Joined

  • Days Won

    524

  • Donations

    0.00 USD 

  • Country

    Germany

 Content Type 

Everything posted by AstroSkipper

  1. AstroSkipper
    I can confirm that. In New Moon 28 devianart.com is working too. So you can report this site to @feodor2 in the issues: https://github.com/Feodor2/Mypal68/issues Cheers, AstroSkipper
  2. AstroSkipper
    Hi @NotHereToPlayGames, I already recommended 360Chrome too. So keep cool and don't be sad! And by the way one example does not mean anything! A lot of modern sites do work in Mypal 68. But in 360Chrome too, of course! I don't use 360Chrome v13 or higher, only v11 due to my hardware limitations. The versions v13 and higher are resource hogs. So, no way for me. Cheers, AstroSkipper
  3. AstroSkipper
    Try Mypal 68! It's really great and works well with modern sites which don't load in old browsers. Did you try New Moon 28 or Serpent 52? Maybe they are enough for you. But it depends on your OS and your hardware conditions too. Cheers, AstroSkipper
  4. AstroSkipper
    If I had one wish and it was possible, I would desire support of XUL based extensions in Mypal 68. Then we could install add-ons from both worlds. Truth be told, I miss a lot of my old beloved extensions and in many cases there is no reasonable substitute among web extensions. In the past I created some custom buttons using Javascript, but no chance to get them work in more recent Firefox versions or in Mypal 68. But as I already said it's just a wish which will probably never come true. Cheers, AstroSkipper
  5. AstroSkipper
    Hi @kuja killer, first of all ProxHTTPSProxy and HTTPSProxy are not my programs. The creators are @heinoganda and @Thomas S., two members of MSFN who haven't been here for a long time. All information about these proxies you can find in my article "ProxHTTPSProxy and HTTPSProxy in Windows XP for future use" here: In this article a lot of your questions will be answered. You can use these proxies with any browsers, but that doesn't always make sense. Both proxies provide TLS 1.2 protocol where it is missing, for example in IE8. Read first post and you will understand! By the way my project is ProxHTTPSProxy's PopMenu 3V1 which is described in this post: The goal of this thread is to ensure that these proxies will do their job in the future. That's the reason why I maintain them. Regarding to your problems you have to use more recent browsers like Mypal 68 or one of the 360Chrome editions. You can't solve your problem using one of these proxies. But as already mentioned read my article and a lot of your questions will be answered! Cheers, AstroSkipper
  6. AstroSkipper
    You're welcome!
  7. AstroSkipper
    And one additional tip. For better overview delete all unnecessary entries in config.ini! Keep only entries of sites you really use! @heinoganda added a lot of sites, maybe to his needs. The config.ini of HTTPSProxy is nearly empty comparing to ProxHTTPSProxy's one. Cheers ,AstroSkipper
  8. AstroSkipper
    Problem solved. Config.ini has to be modified. In section [SSL Pass-Thru] you have to deactivate *gov.uk* by setting # in front of the string or delete *gov.uk* completely.
  9. AstroSkipper
    Ok, I think I've found the problem. It's a certificate problem. HTTPSProxy created a certificate for this site, but ProxHTTPSProxy REV3e didn't. You have to modify config.ini of ProxHTTPSProxy REV3e. Check the folder certs and you'll see, there is no certificate for image.email.tfl.gov.uk.
  10. AstroSkipper
    AFAIK @RainyShadow uses ProxHTTPSProxyMII v1.5, but an older version. You and me, we use ProxHTTPSProxy REV3e and we have the same problem. The older HTTPSProxy doesn't have any problems like @RainyShadow's old release. I think it's a cipher problem. Check the used cipher on image.email.tfl.gov.uk and compare it to the ciphers of both proxies.
  11. AstroSkipper
    Using ProxHTTPSProxy IE8 fails to show this image. Using HTTPSProxy IE8 has no problem with that image. Maybe a cipher problem. You can compare used cipher on https://browserleaks.com/ssl
  12. AstroSkipper
    Agreed! That really and truly is the only end possible with an ecosystem that revolves around "nightly" and "weekly" updates. You cannot properly and adequately "test" software with that release schedule. Your user-base does the "testing" for you. Oten resulting in bugs from six months ago being buried very deep because it took six months for the user-base to find it versus the "coder" that is SUPPOSED TO HAVE BETTER KNOWLEDGE of the "code" but the "coder" didn't have the TIME to "test". Agreed totally too! Nowadays the user is demoted to be a beta tester. That's one of the reasons I prefer @feodor2's release schedule. The new version of Mypal 68 (68.12.3) seems to have been tested more deeply than browsers with a one week release schedule. Of course, a one month interval for developing and testing doesn't mean all bugs have been eliminated or all missing features have been added , but for me the new release of Mypal 68 seems to be very matured. Anyway, I am very happy about the progress of development. Cheers, AstroSkipper
  13. AstroSkipper
    You're welcome!
  14. AstroSkipper
    The new release is great. Try it! After a lot of testing I am really impressed. Full add-on support! I love it!
  15. AstroSkipper
    It's not a secret and you are always welcome here, of course. I only asked for a SSE release of discontinued Mypal for my old AthlonXP. The link couldn't be shared officially. So nothing happened! All is good!
  16. AstroSkipper
    Thanks a lot! In the past I didn't realize that there were other builds of Mypal. Was it buried in the issues too? In the official folder definitely not. Anyway, thanks!
  17. AstroSkipper
    @feodor2 seems to have fixed the immature add-on support. I installed seven new extensions without any hassle. No restart, they were immediately added to addon manager as it should be. Great! Thanks a lot @feodor2! I have to go on testing, but so far, very impressive. I am really happy! Cheers, AstroSkipper
  18. AstroSkipper
    Hi @RainyShadow, I did a little research and you are absolutely right. Mea culpa! @feodor2 provided a Mypal 28.14.1 SSE build in the past. Sadly I missed that, it was really buried somewhere in the issues. Using the Wayback Machine I found it in the issue 126: https://web.archive.org/web/20201107143124/https://github.com/Feodor2/Mypal/issues/126 Unfortunately the download link is no longer available. Do you have a copy of this release? If so, I would like to ask you to be so kind as to upload this copy. The reason is I do have an old computer with an AthlonXP 3200+ too. Therefore any SSE release of good software (especially Mypal) is welcome and would be great. Kind regards, AstroSkipper
  19. AstroSkipper
    And now some good news! The source code of ProxHTTPSProxy REV3e is still available in this post: This is the download link of ProxHTTPSProxy REV3e's source code: https://www.mediafire.com/file/s9027bdxffodbna/cryptography-2.8-py3.4_openssl-1.1.1d.rar/file Cheers, AstroSkipper
  20. AstroSkipper
    You are a Super Moderator and you know a lot of members here in this forum. Is there anyone in MSFN with such skills?
  21. AstroSkipper
    Hi @Dave-H, try this site to see all ciphers classified due to its TLS version: https://browserleaks.com/ssl Here is a screenshot of Iceape-UXP accessing browserleaks.com using its native TLS protocol (max. TLS 1.3): There you can see which TLS version is currently used and its ciphers. You can clearly realize that exactly three ciphers are relating to TLS 1.3: - TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (0x1301) - TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 (0x1303) - TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (0x1302) Here is a screenshot of Iceape-UXP accessing browserleaks.com using ProxHTTPSProxy REV3e: And these three mentioned TLS 1.3 related ciphers are obviously not present in ProxHTTPSProxy REV3e. @heinoganda added a lot of TLS 1.2 ciphers I have never seen before, but unfortunately no ciphers relating to TLS 1.3 protocol. My conclusion: ProxHTTPSProxy REV3e contains openssl-1.1.1d including support for TLS 1.3, but the TLS 1.3 related ciphers have to be added or implemented by a person with Python programming skills yet. So we need a programmer as it was @heinoganda in the past. Cheers, AstroSkipper
  22. AstroSkipper
    I had never seen a SSE release of Mypal in the past. I used it and it was my favourite browser until development was dropped. Feodor provided only a 32 and a 64 Bit release of each version. And I would know of it whether such a SSE release existed in the past or not.
  23. AstroSkipper
    I can't open https://web.whatsapp.com/. It is immediately redirected to https://www.whatsapp.com/.
  24. AstroSkipper
    Mypal 68 is portable. Therefore you can try to modify whatever you want without any tragic consequences. If it doesn't work, simply delete it! I do have a main profile and one for testing purpose only.
  25. AstroSkipper
    I think he meant a release supporting CPUs with SSE instructions set only, lacking of SSE2 or higher.
×
×
  • Create New...