AstroSkipper

I do think so too but last not least it's a question of confidence, of course! I usually store passwords in Keepass and use an addon to access them. All passwords in one place. For me simply great.

I would never store any passwords in a browser of Russian or Chinese origin. Therefore 360Chrome is fully portable for me!

In 1986 my first personal computer with the 8088 cpu had only 640 KB RAM too. No harddisk, only two 5.25 floppy devices.

Good to know that it worked for you. Of course, Mypal 68 is in an early state of development. We will see what it will be. But I think it is a very interesting and promising project.

An experimental solution for the error code 0x80072F78 while accessing the WU/MU website If on the WU/MU website the error code 0x80072F78 appears, turn off your firewall temporarily. If MU is working now, add the program "wuauClt.exe" into the exception list of your firewall and turn your firewall back on. In any case, ProxHTTPSProxy or HTTPSProxy must not be blocked by your firewall. Same for Internet Explorer, of course. This is rather an experimental solution. In a lot of cases, this tip had helped users to solve the error code 0x80072F78. Try it if you are affected! Maybe it works for you. Cheers! AstroSkipper

I totally agree! BTW did you try Mypal 68 with my settings above in single mode process?

That's right. I am a bit old school and I love my old computer. RAM can't be extended anymore and therefore I prefer browsers with less RAM consumption. V11 is the best choice for me too.

Hi @NotHereToPlayGames, I did some further tests. In my old system only 360Chrome version 11 is the only one I should use. Starting with launch parameter --process-per-site, an empty tab and four installed extensions I got a RAM usage of 260 MB. That's fine. I'll try to open tabs as less as possible i.e. not more than 3 tabs. Under these conditions the overall performance is definitely okay for me. Thanks again for your tests and information! Cheers! AstroSkipper

Of course, I know that but opening tabs in Chrome browsers are consuming much more RAM than opening them in a browser supporting single process mode. Therefore it is problematic for my old system. But do not misinterpret my statements, I appreciate your work here and it is great to have a more recent Chrome alternative in Windows XP. And RAM uconsumption is a problem caused by developer and not by you.

Chinese installers are great! Aren't they?

Thanks for your quick reply! I do not focus. on process count only. I do focus on RAM usage. Each new opened tab consumes nearly 100 MB. Currently I have three different tabs and only one extension in 360 Chrome and a RAM usage of 93 + 90 + 110 + 113 + 90 = 496 [MB]. Each more tab means nearly 100MB more. Sorry, too much. In Mypal 68 I have three different tabs and two extension consuming only 400 MB. Therefore 20 percent less RAM usage. It makes definitely a difference running a browser in multi process or single process mode.

Correct! For me too! I tried it and RAM usage was worse. In Chrome there is no single process mode anymore. It existed in Chromium (--single-process) but due to the fact that I avoided Chrome browsers in the past I don't know if it is still supported. 360Chrome version 11 crashes with the launch parameter --single-process. Therefore 360Chrome browser and, after a short research, presumeably all Chrome browsers do not have a single process mode anymore. I agree if Mypal 68 is running in multi process mode. But Mypal 68 can be used in a single process mode using these about:config settings: browser.tabs.remote.autostart false dom.ipc.processCount 1 In this mode you'll have only one instance of mypal.exe with less RAM consumption. Starting Mypal 68 with these settings in my system leads to a RAM usage of less than 300 MB. What do you think about launch parameter --process-per-site in 360Chrome? On some web sites this parameter is recommended to reduce RAM consumption. I rather doubt that. Cheers, AstroSkipper

Hi @NotHereToPlayGames, at first my compliment for your hard work here! You made it possible to have a more recent Chrome browser in Windows XP without annoying Chinese language strings. Thanks for that! Now I have a question relating to the RAM consumption of your 360Chrome editions. I use Windows XP on a very old computer with only 1.5 GB RAM. Is there an option to reduce RAM consumption significantly? Maybe a kind of single process mode as in Mypal 68? AFAIK people are advised to use 360Chrome version 11 on older systems. I tried your 360Chrome version 11 and 13.5, but in both cases the RAM consumption is very high starting the browser with an empty tab only. Any recommendations? Cheers, AstroSkipper

Thanks for your complement! But to get manually rid of an addon (remove function doesn't work properly, indeed), the file extensions.json is the most important. The other files prefs.js, extension-preferences.json and extension-settings.json contain only preferences and settings, and do not harm i.e. can be left there. Cleaning these files isn't necessary, and for a lot of people it is simply too complicated, I think. In folder storage\default\moz-extension+++* the symbol * is a string of numbers and letters until ^userContextId=. For example ee6c8d43-8548-44cf-8b7a-f045e5a7edd9 is relating to adblockultimate@adblockultimate.net. Where do I get this information from? Simply open site about:config and search for this string! In Preference Name extensions.webextensions.uuids you'll find the answer. Cheers, AstroSkipper

Here is a tip how to get completely rid of an installed addon in Mypal 68: 1. You have to find out the extension ID of that addon. Click Help -> Troubleshooting Information. In section Extensions you can copy the related ID. 2. Under Tools -> Add-ons remove the problematic addon. 3. Close browser. 4. Go to your profile folder and open the file extensions.json in a good editor like Notepad++ which supports highlighting of brackets. 5. Search for the extension ID and delete its complete string from {"id": to "location":"app-profile"} curly brackets inclusive. Each extension begins and ends with these curly brackets. Between two different extensions may be only one comma. 6. Now delete in subfolder extensions related xpi file and its staged folder if existent. 7. Now start your browser, open Add-ons and you'll see the problematic addon has gone completely. Kind regards, AstroSkipper

In my computer is only a SSE2 cpu working. uBlock Origins fails to install as reported above. I quoted @feodor2's comment to issue #9. In case of uBlock presumeably only people using older computers like me are affected. Generally I think it's an early state of development and addon support is still immature at the moment.

It has already been reported that uBlock Origin doesn't work in Mypal 68 at the moment. I tried several versions and couldn't install any of them too. But I found an interesting alternative adblocker working in Mypal 68. It's AdBlocker Ultimate and works without any problems. I'm fine with that. Here is a link: https://addons.mozilla.org/de/firefox/addon/adblocker-ultimate/ . You can use the latest version 3.7.16. And @feodor2, my compliment for your great work! I am really impressed by the performance on heavy loading web sites in this early state of development. Kind regards, AstroSkipper

Hi @roytam1, good news for you! Using a clean profile, no problems in accesing web site https://sourceforge.net/projects/otter-browser/files/ Furthermore I tried again updating my installation to the latest version. Using my old profile and deleting all sourceforge related cookies, no more crashes. The problematic web site can be accessed without any problems. Therefore thanks for your quick reply and next time I'll try usimg a clean profile first. But such errors are a bit strange in any cases. Cheers, AstroSkipper

Very strange! Never had such problems. My environment is a real installation (no VM) of Windows XP Professional + all POSReady updates. It's a very old computer with a Pentium 4 CPU 32Bit in perfect condition and without any errors or problems. As mentioned before your previous versions never had any problems accessing this web site. For me it was the first time your browser crashed. And I could reproduce this crash. Anyway, I will try using a clean profile for testing purpose.

Hi @roytam1, I updated to your latest Pale Moon release "palemoon-28.10.5a1.win32-git-20220423-ba47fad4d-uxp-059e35a46-xpmod.7z". While trying to access web site https://sourceforge.net/projects/otter-browser/files/, the browser crashed immediately in modul xul.dll. I tried it more times, same result. Here is a copy of Event ID: Type : Error Date : 23.04.2022 Time : 16:52:06 Event : 1000 Source : Application Error Category : None User : N/A Computer : SKIPPERDESKTOP Description: Fehlgeschlagene Anwendung palemoon.exe, Version 4.8.4.8147, fehlgeschlagenes Modul xul.dll, Version 4.8.4.8147, Fehleradresse 0x0130f96c. And here is a copy of data: 0000: 41 70 70 6C 69 63 61 74 Applicat 0008: 69 6F 6E 20 46 61 69 6C ion Fail 0010: 75 72 65 20 20 70 61 6C ure pal 0018: 65 6D 6F 6F 6E 2E 65 78 emoon.ex 0020: 65 20 34 2E 38 2E 34 2E e 4.8.4. 0028: 38 31 34 37 20 69 6E 20 8147 in 0030: 78 75 6C 2E 64 6C 6C 20 xul.dll 0038: 34 2E 38 2E 34 2E 38 31 4.8.4.81 0040: 34 37 20 61 74 20 6F 66 47 at of 0048: 66 73 65 74 20 30 31 33 fset 013 0050: 30 66 39 36 63 0D 0A 0f96c.. The previous version "palemoon-28.10.5a1.win32-git-20220416-ba47fad4d-uxp-30e8509fd-xpmod.7z" does not have any problems accessing this web site. If you need more information, please let me know! Kind regards, AstroSkipper

Update notification: Due to false alarms generated by some virus scanners I had to completely recreate the cacert Updater Fixed. The previous version was just a fixed and modified variant of the original file. My Avast virus scanner was constantly analyzing the file cacert_Updater.exe and generating false alarms, although it was of course virus- and malware-free. Avast did not like this old version at all, probably because of non-matching CRC check sums. Here are the VirusTotal scan results of the old "cacert Updater Fixed" and the recreated "cacert Updater Fixed" file for comparison: Old version of cacert_Updater_Fixed: Recreated version of cacert_Updater_Fixed: Now you can see the success of recreating. Only one unimportant scanner reports a (false) warning. Therefore I provide a new download link of the recreated "cacert Updater Fixed" version. Here it is: https://www.mediafire.com/file/y98gtqf8ewr6zz4/cacert_Updater_Fixed_Recreated.7z/file Kind regards, AstroSkipper

All options of the Automatic Updates (AU) applet are greyed out In Windows XP the configuration of Automatic Updates is done by an applet from Control Panel. In some cases, when you open this AU applet, all of the configuration options may be greyed out and inaccessible for the user. Very often this happens due to any of following reasons: Either you're not logged on as Administrator, or Automatic Updates Policy is enabled which can be caused for example by using WSUS + WUMT method or by individual changes to AU time intervall settings. To recover access to these options you have to delete a few keys and to change some settings in your registry. One of them has been set by using WSUS + WUMT method: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\WindowsUpdate But there are a few more keys and settings in your registry causing this behavior. I recommend to backup the registry first for safety reasons. If you are not familiar with registry keys, or you do not dare to delete or to change them, you can apply the following reg file which deletes all responsible keys and changes settings automatically. Here is the download link of FixAUOptionsGreyedOut reg file: https://www.mediafire.com/file/uqt1r3d2mz5r30x/FixAUOptionsGreyedOut.7z/file If you want to know which keys and settings are affected, have a look inside the reg file! Kind regards, AstroSkipper

Microsoft Knowledge Base (MKB) and their KB articles For getting information and solving problems in Windows XP, Microsoft Knowledge Base had been an important source for a long time. But unfortunately most KB articles relating to Windows XP were deleted by Microsoft on their servers some years ago. Now we need other sources to get these KB articles. One method is to use a Wayback Machine like archive.org. Here is the link: https://web.archive.org/ Insert the original link of a KB article and in a lot of cases it was already archived in the past. But there are other sources too. Here is the best alternative: https://www.betaarchive.com/wiki/index.php?title=Microsoft_KB_Archive And this is an offline database with more than 200000 KB articles: https://archive.org/details/MicrosoftKnowledgeBaseArchive200000Articles Good luck in searching KB articles, AstroSkipper

I totally forgot to mention the main reason why you can't easily put ProxHTTPSProxy in first place. There are three executables relating to heinoganda's proxy, two located in program's root directory and the main executable in a subfolder of it, all with different functIons. In contrast HTTPSProxy has got only one executable. Therefore it's easy to put HTTPSProxy.exe in first place but not in case of ProxHTTPSProxy.

Maybe these 2807 definitions files are the very last. I do not use MSE but perhaps they are working. Link: https://msfn.org/board/topic/175514-microsoft-security-essentials-and-windows-xp/?do=findComment&comment=1165552 And the (second) ZippyShare Webproxy link of MSE updater 1.9 is still alive: https://msfn.org/board/topic/175514-microsoft-security-essentials-and-windows-xp/?do=findComment&comment=1122545 But I think the updater does not work anymore. Try it! AstroSkipper