Jump to content

vinifera

Member
  • Posts

    2,058
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    2
  • Donations

    0.00 USD 
  • Country

    Croatia

Everything posted by vinifera

  1. you mean 12, win7 comes with 11 and 12 should be able to be ported over, as WDM and kernel aren't that different comparing to XP but, they will probably block it out just like Service Pack 2 was
  2. true there even BSOD isn't lightware anymore
  3. anything that is managed and not native compiled is garbage and tend to be slower but with 8 and now 10, they are pushing .net to be mandatory integrated part of an OS which brings me to their statement that "this is last windows version", this somehow smells to me that next thing in line is actual .net based OS project Singularity was in dark veil since years MS obviously does NOT plan killing .net as they are stubbornly continue with it vista and 7 needed only .net 2 for DWM but this new metroized os-es need I guess minimum version 4 and the more you go the more .net/wpf/xaml will take over
  4. thats destiny for any OS unfortunately
  5. ah the hype arrogance if I install that stupid thing into multiple VM's, and install guest additions, the s*** has access to network and voila spyware report that IT has been installed why don't they report how many have been formated/removed ? aah yes there is no telemetry for that !
  6. this OS is gestapo OS half s*** you can't disable and then online every "famous" IT article or blog glorifies this POS without mentioning how much privacy loss is there don't forget that updates can't be disabled, so whatever they want to stick it in you they will
  7. seems like anyone whos upgrading via WU to this crap final build gets broken OS or even non installable
  8. that's why Q gave me this super duper hand-watch that can reflect upgrade
  9. XP had better gaming support less drive corruption and lets not forget uxtheme
  10. its better with DWM on d2d is broken in NT 6
  11. how us explorer as something stinks here half things are missing in options or toolbars
  12. and then they expect positive reaction....
  13. why shouldn't they eventually tablets will replace books and notebooks (paper ones) all they need is longer battery life and cheap inet access
  14. this is bul***** why do so many vcpp 6 and vb6 communities bitching still today of leaving compatibility with future NT vista, and seven needed .net 2 for DWM, MIL and Mediacentre eight and ten, need it for DWM, MIL, and METRO appx's since they are WPF - and worst thing with .net is that user MUST "keep up" with versions and thus new OS there is no legacy support unless dev "recompiles" (which isn't really compiling) the stupid app.net to use lower version IF possible since v2 doesn't have some functions that 3 has, anyone doing their crap within 4.x and makes it, users with v2 won't be able to use it so lets download bunch of new crap libraries that are useless... with NORMAL visual studio's all you had to do is install ~800 kb of runtimes and everything works ! theres nothing about .net that is easier but it was MS's way to kill Java and again enforce their crap onto users and bravo for them they managed...
  15. actually many things are ... fubar I don't have to tell how much I hate .net which is a must now all the Metro BS depends on it... - and again those .appx are retarded anyway DWM has been crippled the win "10" just like "8" WILL have user tracking usage integrated, this was comfirmed the whole usability of an OS is gone down the toilet drain so yeah... welcome to new age lols
  16. how I feel ? my toilet paper looks nicer than current NTOS btw new builds are being made so 10240 isn't Release To Manure version
  17. yes, like you're in a tomb or black hole and the last thing you see is stupid windows logo
  18. as with borders controls are easily replacable user just needs patcher for their theme services
  19. they can stick IT up their A-hole a monstrosity of an OS like someone comented to someones blog Windows 10 goes Released To Manure
  20. mmm just to correct you win "10" isn't borderless, its just reduced to 1 px, or their intern hack to 0 px i know XP had same s*** applied but you couldn't go below 2px windows theme engine (not dwm), is simply not as like OSX's windows frames are actually just classic shelled, painted and they will never die/dissapear, its just visual trick even on XP you can theme them to be invisible, but they are still there
  21. dunno about vista but for win7 users, they can jump to W7EPOS but rest assured vista,7 and 8 will be thrown in mud theres little that community can do about it XP only got lucky coz of WEPOS, maybe 7 will too depends of MS's counter-measures regarding patches but vista is a no go
  22. and who cares ? ... ...
  23. colored or not it still looks like crap
  24. OR you don't have right codecs OR you didn't configure your video player correctly to use DXVA
×
×
  • Create New...