Leaderboard

No, it needs to be C++ source code.

So what? They share between themselves via PM. But no links in public. I also shared my personally written programmes with certain members. Some of them wrote similar software based on my knowledge and findings, My famous Chrome/Opera starter app., for example.

I never saw any links to it. I only saw someone at github asked win32 to publish the source code to that mysterious dll file, but no answer. Usually it's at github, these days.

What do you mean? I decided not to. Some people don't appreciate our hard work and make scandals out of thin air. I also made Supermium starter app. But share only with the ones I want.

And that is one reason why I love our legacy versions of uBlock Origin. No such badlists.txt file. Personally, I don't like being restricted by whoever and for whatever reason although all is done in the name of "security", of course.

Maybe, for you. But I fear you are just one of the few. uBlock Origin works great. However, you just have to be able to handle it. But we have already had a lengthy discussion about this. Please, provide a link to the YouTube video where ads are not blocked by uBO! Your recommendation is unfortunately completely off-topic. Your Chrome webextension Adblock does not exist for legacy browsers. Only Adblock Plus in the last version 2.9.1 from June of 2017 which is unmaintained and obsolete since then. So if there is more necessary than only your selected filter list "Anti-Circumvention Filters", then it presumably won't work as expected. BTW, the Anti-Circumvention Filters https://github.com/abp-filters/abp-filters-anti-cv also seem to have been obsolete for some time now. The repository has been archived in December of 2023. PS: And another piece of bad news for you. Sorry for that in advance! The latest version of your beloved Adblock extension apparently no longer blocks ads on YouTube, as several users have reported in the Chrome Web Store, and is also no longer available for Thorium (Chrome 122). Here is a link: https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/adblock-—-block-ads-acros/gighmmpiobklfepjocnamgkkbiglidom/reviews?hl=en

Thanks. Bottom line - the conspiracy theory that somebody shut down somebody else's project is just that, a conspiracy theory.

Binaries are back, source issue is clarified: IDA-RE's dll is also closed source.

@66cats, save your breath. Apply the ignore settings in the forum. They are not perfect but, well, es lo que hay, we say in Argentina.

Probably the same people who started spreading rumors that Linux is open source. I'm having trouble reconciling how something shared with a small circle of friends could be thought of as famous. Horse-famous, maybe?

Yep! Thanks for clarification! However, I have already found out that, too. Greetings, AstroSkipper

You're welcome. Credits to @VistaLover, of course.

Important. @AstroSkipper The fact Supermium and Thorium still need these flags can only tell one thing, the portable patch is NOT applied by the author, the information on the site is misleading, to put it politely, so the browser is not fully portable, and if you start this browser without these flags, your old profile is gone! --disable-machine-id --disable-encryption

Screen for @AstroSkipper EDIT: Note, spaces 20 20 20 ... starting at offset 170CA4 are simply reserved for short testing flags like --no-sandbox flag, so you can start typing right there. My loader is unified, and will work for Supermium, also.

I am working on a fix right now. You are welcome to contact me here or on the Basilisk GitHub mirror if you are unable to contact me on the Pale Moon Forum or Pale Moon repo. There is also an official subreddit at https://old.reddit.com/r/basiliskbrowser

Same here. Might have something to do with @AstroSkipper's single-core rig, happens to me all the time posting from a Coppermine PIII (on any forum). BTW, IDA-RE's dll does seem to speed up Thorium/Supermium (launching for the first time, and at least as far as Speedometer 2 is concerned). Curious factoids: it's now called "chrome-xp-api-adapter.dll" instead of "progwrp.dll" (i renamed it), and it's 24KB vs. 131KB of the original.

... Well yes, sadly, this has also happened to me, especially when using Serpent 52 to post (only very rarely happens when using KafanMiniBrowser ) ... Well, after reloading the page (and praying during the page reload that whatever you've already written won't be lost ), do NOT immediately re-click the "Submit" button; first open in a new tab the MSFN thread you're posting to and inquire whether your post has indeed been uploaded, despite the browser hang; once you verify this is not the case, only then do click the "Submit" button anew ; FWIW, I had similar issues when using St52 to post comments on GitHub, but now, since MS made GH almost unusable in UXP-based browsers, I use KMB for GH (where that issue almost never manifests itself) ... Kind regards.

Months ago, I added the filters you describe to my uBlock Origin My Filters list, but only for it on BNavigator. I noticed the problem months ago, that YouTube would present the adblocker nag overlay despite uBlock Origin Legacy being used with filter lists that would normally filter that content on other browsers. The problem does not occur with any of the other @roytam1 browsers, including Iceape-UXP, which is, like BNavigator, a SeaMonkey derivative. Adding the given filters helps but is not without incontinences (page scrolling breaks (workaround is to put video in fullscreen and then restore) and video stop playing once after a second or few (workaround is to click the video or its play button to manually start playing the video)). Such is rather unfortunate. Out of all rouytam1's browsers, YouTube works best in BNavigator, notwithstanding the herein described issue.

I use the flag --max-connections-per-host=15 on my very old and weak hardware, however, with Thorium under Windows XP. So far, it works great.

Huh? I'm asking Dixel if he's sure the source wasn't published (and not getting an answer). Also pointing out the question is not rhetorical &, not being a coder, i wouldn't know where to look. Not sure how i could've been more explicit. having trouble reconciling this with

I think Klemper's logic is very simple, and I tend to agree, no source for that particular dll would mean Supermium is indeed close source, it's simply won't even launch without it. It's not "hearsay", no source for that dll was ever published, I looked.

HDD gone bad, but don't run CHDSK, it will do more harm, I recommend to make a backup ASAP.

That's also happened for me when one of the VRAM chips on my GPU began to slowly die.

That's because it is part of Windows 10/11. But old systems and WinPE are missing it.

360Chrome v22.3.3015 which is Chrome v122 and also 360Chrome v22.1.1084 which is Chrome v119. They are not "same as Thorium and Supermium". They don't work on OS below 10.

Thanks! I'm a bit better today. So what's the progress? 368.81, I never had any good experience with it. It's heavily tweaked for Pascal cards under Win10, leaving older generations falling far behind due to the lack of optimizations, there's a lot videos about that. Try something 355.xx.

Use JustOff's tool MozJAR Recompressor: https://github.com/JustOff/mozjarr/tree/master All about re-compressing such files was already discussed here: https://msfn.org/board/topic/184051-my-browser-builds-part-4/?do=findComment&comment=1248092 and here: https://msfn.org/board/topic/184051-my-browser-builds-part-4/?do=findComment&comment=1247872 Cheers, AstroSkipper

In 7-Zip directories are added as items separate for any files they may contain. You can see they have dates and attributes. Most archivers do this. The XPI contains only files. Each file header in the Zip central directory has a 36 bytes long extra field. With many files and directories, this adds up. Old archivers like RAR do not add this, but the Deflate compression there is worse.

Dragging myself back on topic, I discovered a workaround for chase.com on Serpent. At least it works on 55; haven't tried 52 yet but it'll probably work there too, at least as long as you use my StructuredClone polyfill via ???Monkey. When you first log on, you get the dreaded: But if you click "Plan & track," then click back to "Accounts," it will come up and work fine! Well, mostly fine; if you have multiple accounts, the "Transfer money" option is broken. You can't select the other account to transfer money to. Have to use a more modern browser for that function to work. But at least it's usable outside of that function.

Those they change manually in the end, to target a specific OS version. I think win32 wrote about it somewhere.

Of course not, but it's not a bug deal, just open with CFF Explorer and change PE Header to 5.1 or smth. But! I guess there was a reason he blocked it from running on OS below 10.

Yes, it does; and Chase is working on my old phone again. Firefox retains compatibility with phones even older than mine - although I went with 115 instead of 125, just to be stubborn. At least I know I can upgrade again when that nag comes back, and the phone itself will work as long as I don't drop it and 4G still exists. (4G will go away at some point, but my old phone probably has another year or two left.) Almost certainly, at least if you use Facebook/Instagram/Snapchat. At least Meta isn't quite as pervasive as Alphabet (yet); you can avoid using anything Meta owns - at least, if you know that they own it! But the whole darn Internet buys Google ads, uses Google products and services, watches YouTube videos (even on other sites), etc.

Man, is this what you were looking for? C:\DCI. ├───DISK1 │ │ LICENSE.DOC │ │ LOADBMP.DOC │ │ README.TXT │ │ SPEC16.DOC │ │ │ └───DEVKIT │ ├───BIN │ │ DCIMAN.DLL │ │ DCISVGA.DRV │ │ DVA.386 │ │ ICCVID.DRV │ │ IR32.DLL │ │ MSVIDEO.DLL │ │ UDH.DLL │ │ │ ├───INC │ │ COMPDDK.H │ │ DCIDDI.H │ │ DCIMAN.H │ │ │ ├───LIB │ │ DCIMAN.LIB │ │ │ └───SAMPLE │ ATI68800.ASM │ BRESNHAM.C │ CBLIT.ASM │ CLIPBLIT.C │ CONVERT.ASM │ DCIENTRY.C │ DCIEXFNS.C │ DCIHDW.C │ DCIHDW.H │ DCIMACRO.INC │ DCISAMP.C │ DCISAMP.DEF │ DCISAMP.RC │ DEBUG.H │ GDIDEFS.INC │ MAKEFILE │ READNDX.ASM │ STRBLIT.ASM │ STUBAPI.ASM │ VALIDBMP.C │ VERSION.H │ VERSION.RCV │ ├───DISK2 │ LOADBMP.DLL │ TDCITEST.EXE │ TMCIAVI.EXE │ └───VFW11DRT ACMCMPRS.DL_ AVICAP.DL_ AVIFILE.DL_ CLEANUP.RE_ COMPOBJ.DL_ CTL3D.DL_ DCISVGA.DR_ DISPDIB.DL_ DVA.38_ ICCVID.DR_ IMAADPCM.AC_ INIUPD.DL_ IR21_R.DL_ IR32.DL_ MAP_WIN.HL_ MCIAVI.DR_ MCIOLE.DL_ MPLAYER.EX_ MPLAYER.HL_ MPLAYER.RE_ MSACM.DL_ MSACM.DR_ MSADPCM.AC_ MSCOMSTF.DL_ MSCPYDIS.DL_ MSCPYDIS.IN_ MSCUISTF.DL_ MSDETECT.IN_ MSDETSTF.DL_ MSINSSTF.DL_ MSRLE.DR_ MSSHLSTF.DL_ MSUILSTF.DL_ MSVIDC.DR_ MSVIDEO.DL_ OLE2.DL_ OLE2.RE_ OLE2CONV.DL_ OLE2DISP.DL_ OLE2NLS.DL_ OLE2PROX.DL_ PROFDISP.EX_ SETUP.EXE SETUP.INI SETUP.IN_ SETUP.LST SETUP.MST SETUPAPI.IN_ STDOLE.TL_ STORAGE.DL_ TYPELIB.DL_ _MSSETUP.EX_ _MSTEST.EX_

You don't have to worry about it, it's not used on older OS like XP. Vista needs a small update for 11, KB971512 and for Firefox - KB2117917, too.

From my experience, 382.xx versions and below are the only ones that were written for Windows Vista and 7. Later are just ported 10 drivers. To be 100% sure, try R375 (376.xx) series.

You're right, but it's not a matter of DoH someday becoming the "only option" because the last holdout, MCP, finally caved and supported it! DoH's mere existence threatens ad blocking at the router. Let's say you have a Roku app, which of course is completely unrelated to your computer or Web browser. The author of that app doesn't want you to block ads, so he/she/it already has a huge financial incentive to build DoH into the app so you can't. And DoH already exists, so there's nothing (besides a little development cost) to stop the author from doing so. Thanks for the suggestions, but what does it buy me? You of all people should know how much work it takes to remove all the telemetry from 360Chrome. BTW, the soon-to-be-minimum versions at chase.com are Chrome 116 and FF 115. The former won't run on W7, so it's either Supermium, Thorium, one of the 360Chrome versions above, or Mo (my new abbreviation for modern Firefox) 115 ESR. I think I trust Supermium v118 most, but in any case, there's very little true choice left among "modern" browsers. Edit: I just learned of r3dfox (pronounced "red fox"), a Win 7-compatible fork of Mo that will hopefully outlast v115 ESR. Which proves the point @VistaLover was making - that's only five versions above your current "primary" and only five versions older than the "latest and [supposedly] greatest." Google has us all on their "upgrade" treadmill now, even if you skip a handful of versions each time.

Ok. Didn't notice that. Then it wasn't a request for normal DNS after all

Well, that explains the otherwise odd-seeming upping of the required minimum from 113 to 115, at least, if it's the last Win 7-compatible version. In any event, Chase lowered the boom rather quickly this time. I can no longer sign in using either Serpent or 360EE. There appears to be a JSON parsing error in my Chase-specific StructuredClone polyfill. @UCyborg's more sophisticated polyfill doesn't do the trick either since it doesn't handle self-referential objects (same problem as with the StructuredClone built into UXP). Also not working: Chrome 106 on Android 6.0. Edge 109 (on Win 7) still works (so, I assume, Chrome 109 would too), but for how long? It too now has the ominous "We'll stop supporting this browser soon" nag. FF 115 ESR will presumably have a somewhat longer lifespan, but the end is in sight there too. Looks like it's gonna be Thorium and/or Supermium in my future, whether I like non-unGoogled Chromium derivatives or not. I appreciate your honesty; but I daresay your "not-so-humble" opinion very likely puts you out of step with the vast majority of MSFN members. Yes, I know you "upgraded" to Windows 10 and are currently using Chromium 114, so perhaps you don't care what happens to those of us who still use earlier Windows versions (even 8.1); but there will come a day when your OS/browser will stop working too, at which point I will be overjoyed to remind you of your "not-so-humble" opinion! I just rename the folder; e.g., rename "New Moon" to "Old Moon" (delete the "Old Moon" folder first, if it still exists from the last update) and restore the new version into a new "New Moon" folder. I even wrote a batch file that automates the process. You don't lose any settings (unless you made your New Moon installation portable). Yes, I noticed that too, some time ago. It's a longstanding bug that also affects the pages shown by long-clicking the Back button. I just decided to live with it. I think their discussion was specifically about DNS over HTTPS, which wasn't a thing until long after XP EOS. Unfortunately, not likely, given MCP's position: DoH is a double-edged sword. It can be used to conceal your browsing habits from your ISP (probably a good thing) but it can also be used by apps to thwart ad blockers like Pi-Hole, which most users would consider a bad thing. But as usual, MCP fails to understand that their decision not to support DoH will have exactly zero effect on its "bad" uses coming to fruition; all it does is mean that Pale Moon users can't easily avail themselves of its "good" uses. (The apostrophe - D'OH - was clever though.)

True, roytam1 may do some own tweaks every once in a while, but all the big stuff comes from upstream. True, but you can only directly configure Windows versions released in last 4 years or so to use DOH (eg. https://www.howtogeek.com/765940/how-to-enable-dns-over-https-on-windows-11/). Older ones require to use a sort of DNS proxy or special support from the browser side.

Aero is not possible with neither XP nor Win10 drivers.

Could you be more specific? which card, etc.