Leaderboard

Yeah, Moonchild says it's a "privacy footgun" but I am not sure how this is the case. I've gotten him to explain it to me before but I still didn't understand his reasoning. Is this a pref that people think should be enabled in upstream Basilisk? If so I can do that. I've been having to enable it to get Basilisk to work for my work sites even before I took over the project.

Agreed!

don't understand. sometimes the error is with 360chrome.exe and sometimes with chrome.dll. hitting the escape key just closes the error and the browser. this is a "non issue" as far as i'm concerned. no need to click that "bookmark menu" star three times when there are no bookmarks ...

Thanks. I did not know (or misunderstood) that this was with ZERO BOOKMARKS.

clicking the star on the left next to the "click to restore" button three times crashes the browser. just add one bookmark and it will not.

It is a Schroedinger antivirus. jaclaz

I agree that would be ideal. Start with v11 (or at least v12, which also runs reasonably well on older computers), then add all the Googlisms and what-have-you that are needed for the modern Web. But that's basically what Moonchild Productions has been trying to do with their UXP platform. But they're still way behind, even though they got an earlier start, have a lot of software developers contributing, and have made impressive recent progress. Practically, I think all it means is, if you think Chase's Web site is malfunctioning, you need to check it on not only a "supported" browser, but also with a clean profile with no extensions, before you report the issue. Which is pretty good advice anyway. I certainly have no problems using, say, uBO at chase.com; in fact it speeds up their Web page noticeably. BTW, Google had a good idea with the "permissions" concept (which Mozilla adopted, and which is also used for Android apps) but the "permissions" they defined are so broad that any browser extension (or Android app) usually needs several scary permissions in order to do anything useful. Yes, of course a browser extension needs permission to read and change Web pages and responses! How could uBO or Palefill work if they couldn't change Web pages? There's a similar one for Android: permission to "read and change data on your device." Meaning permission to read from and write to files. Well, duh.... Making the permissions much more granular would have also made them much more useful.

That's what I did ! Portable, of course. Still, 112 crashes, while 111 is somewhat fine. CAUTION : this browser has undeletable tracking cookies from qq and some other china website , can see it the settings under sites that can always use cookies, you can't delete them. It's hard to imagine the amount of telemetry it has. They wrote on the forum 112 is no good for win 7, since it crashes.

I don't think so. It should support Windoes Vista as well. Did you try to install it under Windows Vista? Anyway! Here is a quotation taken from the AVG support site: https://support.avg.com/SupportArticleView?l=en&urlName=AVG-Windows-XP-Vista-support-FAQ&supportType=home

Not really. It is easy to forgot about the issue or forget how many times the clicking has happened and click three times. Also, not everyone that may use these distributions are necessarily aware of the issue, and it is not reasonable for such people to know to avoid clicking the "Show bookmark menu" icon thrice. The browser also does not have a menu bar. Getting things to happen require interacting with icons or bars like the address bar (menus the appear when interacting with such things) or using keyboard shortcuts. The "Show bookmark menu" icon provides various utility such as showing the Bookmarks bar or Bookmark Manager. What you call the "Win2k-basic-gray" is the normal, window title bar without any visual styling. Visual styling such as the Luna blue styling appears to style over the normal windows, or normal with size and color characteristics modified. Programs that use their own styling (skinning), like 360Chrome, style over regular windows. When something extra to normal operations happens, such as a program crash, the true, unstylized Windows Title bar might show. It might show before or after the crash information dialog appears. I did not know that adding a bookmark would workaround the issue. The problem can still happens when there are bookmarks. When the "Show bookmark menu" icon is clicked at least once while there are zero bookmarks, but not clicked enough times to where the browser crashes, then bookmarks are added, the browser may still crash upon clicking the "Show bookmark menu" icon again. When there are already bookmarks before any clicking of the "Show bookmark menu" icon, and then the bookmarks are removed so that there are zero bookmarks, and then the "Show bookmark menu" icon is clicked many times until the browser crashes, the browser incurs a crash. Crash is when the program stops operating and its instance no longer runs on the operating system, fails to continue to run on the operating system, or is stopped forcibly from continuing to run by the operating system. Maybe the issue is related to that "360 sync login" being expected, but not being present. Perhaps adding a dummy "360 sync login" program or operation can well patch the issue.

OT: I am a cat lover and prefer the assumption that Schrödinger's cat is in a living state despite an existing Heisenbergian uncertainty. And, to be on topic again, all that means I prefer an antivirus program in a working state under Windows XP. Ultimately, it all depends on empirical measurement. AstroSkipper

I can't upload more than 416.42KB files in MSFN,so I have no choice, and 360EE dosn't have the problem like you said....

my program kill only the process of office 2010 running with out associated window this is the bug of this worked version of portable with windows 2000 it's not related to user work , means user don't related to this task ,so you can work and save and do all you need without problems in use of office 2010. i think it's related to Internal security of office 2010 , in many uses with XP compatibility mode it will destroy the files . maybe fcwin2k should update to handle this problem.

Good news! It works with the latest Windows 11 ready BIOS from 06/2022. Stable and no problems. Before I upgraded I made a video: Still no luck without a separate PCI to SATA controller. I even used a PCI-E SATA controller SIL3132 and installation went into a dead end loop. * I used this driver: https://www.vogonsdrivers.com/getfile.php?fileid=458&menustate=0

Click the picture again, you will open the source page, then you can zoom it

Agreed.

This zoom doesn't work as expected, here... No important zoom, the dimension is not superior to the page in vertical...

Yes, in DCBrowser, MiniBrowser too, this same, if I allow scripts. No problem in Basilisk Moebius55, nor in New Moon... but the small window of the login dialog is only displayed for a second...

This would be telemetry by Fifth Third Bank and not by 360Chrome. Have you tried in any other browser, both Chrome-based and Mozilla-based?

With this star at the right: yes, and no problems after many clicks. But the problem is with another star, this one on the left.: "Show bookmark menu" - with tab empty: after 3 clicks, but with website, after 5 clicks I have this problem dialog.

I confirm the behavior of this browser after 3 clicks...

@NotHereToPlayGames - I would like to bring your attention to the following: 1. While an instance of the 360Chrome browser is opened (applies to any of your version series through this version), and the main toolbar's "Show bookmark menu" icon (has a star shape) is clicked three times (does not need to be all at once), the 360Chrome browser software crashes. I have tested this to occur on both Windows XP Professional with Service Pack 3 and Windows Vista with Service Pack 2. See the following picture of an illustration of the crash: This is an annoying problem. 2. When using the 13.5.1030 version series on Windows Vista with Service Pack 2, one receives a Windows Firewall prompt when browsing to the banking Web site, https://www.53.com/ (should redirect to https://www.53.com/content/fifth-third/en.html ). One may otherwise still browse using the 360Chrome Web browser software. I have tried to reproduce the issue while instead using Windows XP Professional with Service Pack 3, but the problem did not reproduce (maybe because the Windows Firewall software is different). The Windows Firewall prompt is illustrated with the following Windows Vista Windows Firewall dialog box: Could this mean that there is still telemetry happening?

@tyukok @sonyu @mina7601 @WinWord2000 @blackwingcat @Jakob99 Hi all, i create program to fix this problem : if the user close office 2010 his process still running , now you dont need to kill process with manual , you can test and tell me : Link1 : https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rcfPSBXYoHo31R3jCjk_-vrCIoSyRLWr/ Link 2 : https://www.mediafire.com/file/882xrdvu886u9u5/O10KWIN2000.zip/file Note : please download this program from Windows 2000 browser , use mypal68 or any browser in windows 2000. the download blocked in google from new windows versions. note : the office 2010 with fcwin2k uses with many uses , some time after reboot system the office 2010 it will doesn't start , then in this case you should to extract again the office 2010 portable.zip again , and run it with XP sp 3 and save compat.

And my question is: Where have you been? Upstream's native WC implementation has been backported to UXP-based browsers by roytam1 (these, of course, include New Moon 28 - but NOT NM27) since the builds released on the first weekend of March: https://msfn.org/board/topic/184051-my-browser-builds-part-4/page/55/#comment-1239941 ... Roy spends considerable free time composing and putting up those Release Notes every Saturday but it appears, in practice, they go totally unnoticed by the majority of users here ; and it's a pity, TBH ... TL;DR: Grab yourself last Saturday's NM28 build and you'll see "what you really want to see"; BTW, since the native WC implementation is still being perfected, don't forget to update to the future NM28 releases as they become available ...

I lost track as I edit that thing as it comes and haven't decided on which Git distribution I should settle ever since I've settled on my daily-driver OS, which is Win10 20H2...should I use the official one or the one that comes with MinGW environment or something else...so ended up installing none as I don't install anything I'm not sure I want to keep installed to keep the OS install clutter-free...and inside my head is also a mess... No idea... Uses 2 invalid class definitions as far as UXP is concerned, UXP doesn't allow variables and such declarations outside of class constructor. palefill-1.26.1.xpi fixes it, makes pictures appear.

... While following the link posted by @gerwin above, I ended up loading below article: https://www.winhelponline.com/blog/disable-full-row-select-explorer-windows-7/ I was (and still am now) on latest Serpent 52.9.0, but, to my dismay , I regrettably found out that images in this article aren't being displayed AT ALL in St52 ; I had to launch a Chromium variant (360EEv12) to be able to see the images, which constitute an important part of the article... Is this a known "Google-ism" that UXP currently lacks? St52's Web Console has a "ReferenceError" and a "SyntaxError" in red lines: ReferenceError: event is not defined[Learn More] https://www.winhelponline.com/blog/disable-full-row-select-explorer-windows-7:167:213 SyntaxError: bad method definition https://www.winhelponline.com/detroitchicago/cmbv2.js:197:336 "Fixes" are gladly welcome ...

thanks UCyborg for the palefill xpi and the structuredClone script. works well in NM28 and 360chrome 13.5 with violentmonkey. ( default template ) had a question about setting this for all sites ( // @match *://*/* ) from the polyfill link NHTPG posted i think that is correct. test can be done here : https://www.measurethat.net/Benchmarks/Show/18967/0/structuredclone-test thanks again UCyborg for the valuable input and also NHTPG for the additional info.

https://www.nirsoft.net/utils/chromepass.html chrome stored passwords can be retrieved with this little free portable utility.