Leaderboard

This is repeating the same debunked pseudoscience that the industry and government have been repeating for years: "Currently the only proven biological effect of exposure to EMF, even at 5G frequencies, is slight tissue heating" Complete hogwash, mostly repeated by physicists who don't know what they're talking about, with no medical or biological credentials. Interestingly, also physicists who told everyone tobacco was safe and climate change doesn't exist... Look at actual reputable, independent, peer-reviewed science - most of which (more than 70%) finds biological effects from non-ionizing RF exposure. Now you are just spreading disinformation around. Industry scientists like to claim it's safe, and we're hearing the same types of claims that we did about lead, tobacco, and more recently climate change. It's the same BS playbook over and over again. 180 scientists signed a petition in 2017, warning about 5G: https://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/Scientist-5G-appeal-2017.pdf 419 scientists have called for a moratorium on the technology: http://www.5gappeal.eu/ The 2020 Consensus Statement of UK and International Medical and Scientific Experts and Practitioners on Health Effects of Non-Ionising Radiation, which represents over 3500 medical doctors, would also disagree with you: https://phiremedical.org/2020-nir-consensus-statement-read/ More recently, 7,000+ scientists, 4,000+ medical doctors, 400+ building biologists, and 13,000+ engineers (and a lot of others) have signed the petition to stop 5G on earth and in space: https://www.5gspaceappeal.org/signatories-organizations Doesn't sound like "just a few people" are concerned to me... More studies: https://www.powerwatch.org.uk/science/studies.asp Here is a portal of 34,000+ more studies on the topic: https://www.emf-portal.org/en Here are some charts showing actual health effects at what the FCC would consider "low" levels of radiation, along with the study the finding was from: https://bioinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/BioInitiativeReport-RF-Color-Charts.pdf Consequently, there is a legitimate reason to be concerned about the 5G rollout: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013935118300161 With all the manufactured doubt created by people just like you, of course, it's no wonder people are misinformed about the topic: https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/how-big-wireless-made-us-think-that-cell-phones-are-safe-a-special-investigation/ Lots of misinformation from outlets like the New York Times, as well: https://microwavenews.com/news-center/fact-free-hit-5g-critic Feel free to subject yourself to whatever exposure you like (and smoke those Camels while you're at it!), but you're not doing anyone a favor by trying to mislead and distort the science. Could go on and on, but clearly, you will believe what you want to believe - cause face it, who wants to believe their gadgets are harming them? - but you can't argue with science. Well... you can, and are... but that doesn't change the reality... Sorry, but I'm getting sick and tired of all the lies and conspiracy theories that are floating around... "smoking is safe" (YES, I still hear this from id***), "climate change doesn't exist" (YES, this too I hear), the vaccine has tracking chips inside it, 5G caused the virus, the election was stolen, 5G is safe with no health effects whatsoever, Windows 7 is not getting ANY security updates, etc. etc. etc. Time and time again, people ignore the facts and believe their own version of reality. If only everyone could be more scientific and actually use their brains, and if they don't know the facts, admit it and do some research.

All that tells me is that the test is FLAWED and not to be relied on! Do you have MULTIPLE css data leakage test sites? As a general rule of thumb, NEVER rely on ONE test case.

Well, this is a view that has been proven wrong by 50 years+ of science and research. You seem to believe that only thermal effects exist, but there are plenty of established non-thermal effects. The FCC would agree with you, and they got sued and lost this year over their outdated guidelines. Perhaps if you have cells in your body... is more like it. All life on earth is affected, especially things like bees, birds, trees, etc. Beyond the scope of what can be put here, but you should do some research and look at the literature. Sounds like you have catching up to do.

Don't forget to disable services that are not needed. My XP config that I use in VM's only has 13 processes and 58 MB of RAM committed at startup per Task Manager once idle and statup time for the VM from XP Logo to full load is 6 seconds! VirtualBox does take about 12 seconds to get to the XP Logo screen. My "beast" has 29 processes but it has network and multi-monitor services/apps, printer spooler, mouse/keyboard services/apps, et cetera - but could probably be slimmed down below 29 processes. I don't recall how many processes a "default" XP config tries to load - but I'm quite certain it is much more than 29. Definitely much more than 13! I use these - [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session Manager\Memory Management] "DisablePagingExecutive"=dword:00000000 "LargeSystemCache"=dword:00000000 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session Manager\Memory Management\PrefetchParameters] "EnablePrefetcher"=dword:00000000 I do not install SuperFetch therefore have no need to disable it in the registry. I am not familiar with the EnableBootTrace setting so unsure if I should add that or not. I also use both of the "NtfsDisableLastAccessUpdate"=dword:00000001 settings but I do not use either of the "NtfsDisable8dot3NameCreation"=dword:00000001 settings so unsure on those two.

I'm grateful for the time that 360EE has made web browsing on XP possible, and it's not even over yet. Because 7 is inferior and it's all downhill from there. No, soon it will not be a computer, but a "Windows appliance" to access the web. I don't understand why...why did the web have to turn into a bloated turd? I mean sure some hipster websites, but pretty much most places you need to go, the whole industry, locks you out if you don't have the latest technology running, and unfortunately that has been s*** for the past decade at least.

Note regarding versions: The regular version will have a file name ending in _rebuild_#. Versions with a file name ending in _ungoogled disables embedded Google APIs in much the same way that "ungoogled-chromium" ( https://chromium.woolyss.com/ ) disables embedded Google APIs. The "ungoogled" version is recommended for those that prefer tighter control over a Google-based browser basically giving special treatment to Google cookies and violating user preference settings. A side effect to this approach (which also exists in "ungoogled-chromium") is that the Chrome Web Store is intentionally broken only in as far as the "Add to Chrome" button is concerned. This is great for those that prefer to manually install extensions as opposed to obtaining from the Chrome Web Store. A workaround to restore the "Add to" button (special thanks to @VistaLover for this solution) can be obtained from here -- https://github.com/NeverDecaf/chromium-web-store Mileage may vary, for me this only added the "Add to" button but clicking it only downloaded the extensions .crx (which I personally prefer anyway) as opposed to 'adding to' 360Chrome. I had similar results with official "ungoogled-chromium" on the official Chrome Web Store (restores "Add to" button but does not actually 'add to'). Special thanks to @Humming Owl for translated .png files. Special thanks to @Dixel for discussions leading towards the "ungoogled" versions. XP x86 SP2: v12, v13, and v13.5 work as-is in XP x86 SP2 but v11 requires special modifications - see this post by @we3fan Download links for starting from scratch with a NEW PROFILE: Regular: https://www.dropbox.com/s/mes4wez1v34w9k4/360ChromePortable_11.0.2031_rebuild_8.zip?dl=1 (last updated: Jan 9, 2022) https://www.dropbox.com/s/wol8va166au2p7j/360ChromePortable_12.0.1247_rebuild_12.zip?dl=1 (last updated: Jan 11, 2022) https://www.dropbox.com/s/6lnst7yp0dt34s5/360ChromePortable_13.0.2206_rebuild_9.zip?dl=1 (last updated: Jan 11, 2022) https://www.dropbox.com/s/8h4z346251wg7r8/360ChromePortable_13.5.1030_rebuild_6.zip?dl=1 (last updated: Jan 11, 2022) Ungoogled: https://www.dropbox.com/s/6z65t5yo08fr0ym/360ChromePortable_11.0.2031_rebuild_8_ungoogled.zip?dl=1 (last updated: Jan 9, 2022) https://www.dropbox.com/s/j5zxk7aqv9ljjjc/360ChromePortable_12.0.1247_rebuild_12_ungoogled.zip?dl=1 (last updated: Jan 11, 2022) https://www.dropbox.com/s/ld5dz2uwdowf1cz/360ChromePortable_13.0.2206_rebuild_9_ungoogled.zip?dl=1 (last updated: Jan 11, 2022) https://www.dropbox.com/s/glulv6r8sce6xpy/360ChromePortable_13.5.1030_rebuild_6_ungoogled.zip?dl=1 (last updated: Jan 11, 2022)

With my current settings: Explorer taking up the most resources (lowered to lowest priority) and my print spoller killer off (and of course the task manager which isn't normally running). 11 processes (I started another process to take the center screen shot and why its was 12) resting at idle 0% ... which is a notable difference from DEP AlwaysOn and without the registry tweaks ... even if only shaving off a few seconds here and there I think its was worth it. Under System Properties -> Performance Options I have (both) processor scheduling and memory usage set to: Programs VS Background Services and System Cache - But I also allow the system to manage the page-file because I don't know what would be the best setting manually. Otherwise, I suspect configuring the page-file and System Cache would be of more benefit.

"How can you prevent attackers from exploiting a CSS injection vulnerability? There are a few simple steps you can take to ensure your application is free from bugs that could allow attackers to include arbitrary CSS content: Apply context-dependent sanitization. This means that you have to use different forms of encoding in different situations: for example, hex encoding within script blocks or HTML entities within other HTML tags. There might be situations where you need to use other forms of sanitization as well, like HTML encoding, or with the help of a white list. Scan your application with a vulnerability scanner, since the vulnerability is essentially an injection of HTML code that can be detected by most web application security scanners. Just like XSS, this attack requires an injection of code. Netsparker can easily detect the underlying injection vulnerability, which is similar to Cross-Site Scripting. Implement a proper Content Security Policy (CSP) if you want to be absolutely sure that an attacker can't abuse this vulnerability, even if you forgot sanitization once. We recommend that you also implement a proper CSP that restricts from where images and stylesheets are allowed to be loaded. This enables you to instruct the user's browser to only load CSS files from your own domain (not cross-domain) or trusted third parties, which would ensure such an attack would fail. Each of these recommendations is essential to prevent the vulnerability across your entire code base." (highlighting is by me.) - here: https://www.netsparker.com/blog/web-security/private-data-stolen-exploiting-css-injection/ Some links I've found about CSP: Content Security Policy - An Introduction (by Scott Helme): https://scotthelme.co.uk/content-security-policy-an-introduction/ CSP Cheat Sheet: https://scotthelme.co.uk/csp-cheat-sheet/ Analyse your HTTP response headers: https://securityheaders.com/ Content Security Policy Browser Test: https://content-security-policy.com/browser-test/ CSP (Content-Security-Policy) Header Test: https://gf.dev/csp-test CSP Evaluator (with google): https://csp-evaluator.withgoogle.com/ Content Security Policy (CSP) Validator: https://cspvalidator.org/#url=https://cspvalidator.org/ Report URI: Analyse your CSP: https://report-uri.com/home/analyse EDIT: By Glebb Ahmutov: Inline javascript is a security risk: https://glebbahmutov.com/disable-inline-javascript-tutorial/index.html - and click the links.. This page does NOT allow inline JavaScript using CSP: https://glebbahmutov.com/disable-inline-javascript-tutorial/index-secure.html - and click the links...

These days there's corporate "science" , woke "science". The real science is left behind . The first two have agendas : money , depopulation , etc . And history rewritten. P.S. I really liked your recent posts .

SURE, every animal adopted is a "serious commitment".

I need to see a source and quantitative measurements. If we are talking 0.00001 second only when we SAVE a file from a "save as" dialog, then this does NOTHING for "resources" just to RUN the computer.

No , it knows I'm his master . It knows its name . It hears when I call it (him) by its name over a very long distance ! There was one incident when it wanted to go , but I was holding him and didn't let go , so it bit me very gently (a soft touch , just to warn me). It just wanted to go . It's a very powrful creature ! Definitely not for everyone . The size is approx. like this one from the video below. As you can see from the video , they are very calm and self-confident . They just know you're not a threat, you would be too weak for them , lol . But when they are small , they are somewhat afraid of you , so if you scare them , yes they can run away or whip you with the tail ! None of these had happened with me for all these 17 years. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w6HBK9A-r6Y It's a serious commitment , think twice before you decide to get an Iguana. EDIT : Agree with @msfntor, applies to every pet ! Also , Iguana size drastically changes and you need to be prepared .

No antivirus here, nono! I don't try for now the registry settings... wait a little, please.. What about your RAM used (in MB), before and after DEP deep abandon please? To see this in the tray, I use Core Temp 1.11 ...

I do have an old flip phone but I do see people have their heads buried down in their smart phones or walking around talking on their ear piece. No wonder people are getting run over and waling onto railroad tracks. Speaking of which ... lately somebody has been calling my phone breathing heavy. Could it be someone with asthma

THE first thing I do when I arrive at the vacation spot every year, is to go 4 kilometers away to collect as many tadpoles as possible from a small hole barely filled with water, which evaporates quickly, and is mostly drunk by foxes and other animals (with tadpoles, oh horror!). I carry these tadpoles to release them in the stream below the garden, but I think that many of them are then killed by the birds... maybe some survive, I hope... It is with joy that I found someone who is interested in tadpoles, and made the videos, example for you here: The process of making friends with tadpoles - and I want to tell you another story: I had a unique friend: the Asian giant hornet, who had his life saved by me taking him out of the water, where he almost drowned being in it for a long time surely... fortunately I arrived in time to save him! And help him to dry himself...he expressed his gratitude, by putting himself on my hand, with visible pleasure! I swear to you. I showed the giant hornet on my hand to a person who was a little horrified...I really like Asian giant hornets and if I see any, I feed them as I can... The Asian giant hornet (vespa mandarinia) - 1.5 inches to 2 inches in length with an orange-yellow head and black and yellow stripes on its abdomen. ...unexpectedly I found someone interested in black wasps, and the nice video is here: The Process Of Making Friends With a Wasp And you, have you had similar meetings in your life?.

You would need to use an RF meter to measure the radiation before and after. There is no way to make an intelligent decision without actual data about the environment. Not disagreeing there!

None where I am right now... Scientists are also concerned about a lot of the new satelittes going up. Frequencies in use now are on the lower side but will go up higher past what's been typical hitherto. A local cell is a lot further away than a transmitter 10 feet away from you. Inverse square law. Shielding is a last resort. Always better to remove the source. If done improperly, shielding can actually reflect the RF back at you and make it worse.

Well, clearly you have no concern for your own well being or your family's. Don't forget, most doctors smoke Camels!!

"5G installed at home"? What do you mean? You let a wireless carrier come in and install a small cell on your garage? Or you just got a 5G-capable device? Either way, not something you want to be near. The whole case for 5G is a pathetic joke anyways. Good wired broadband beats the pants off 5G any day, and in fact, 5G doesn't work without a good wired backhaul.

Hi Personally, I have no problem with the PMPlayer module after having modified install.rdf. But another solution works by disallowing inline scripting that causes the problem in bitchute. In "uBlock origin" go to "settings". and activate "I am an advanced user". then you can forbid the "inline script". this will allow you to view the video with the Bitchute player.

A few things in the registry I've found to be helpful (for me) with only 3GM of RAM. [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session Manager\Memory Management] "DisablePagingExecutive"=dword:00000000 "LargeSystemCache"=dword:00000000 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session Manager\Memory Management\PrefetchParameters] "EnableSuperfetch"=dword:00000000 "EnablePrefetcher"=dword:00000000 "EnableBootTrace"=dword:00000000 Please make sure you back up your registry before making any changes and please don't blame me if its worse for you. Hope it helps some and 13.5 and 3 G of RAM is quite enjoyable now EDIT: And.. [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\FileSystem] "NtfsDisable8dot3NameCreation"=dword:00000001 "NtfsDisableLastAccessUpdate"=dword:00000001 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\FileSystem Management] "NtfsDisable8dot3NameCreation"=dword:00000001 "NtfsDisableLastAccessUpdate"=dword:00000001

> Smoking gun, EMR from 5G causing the sickness, increases after the nano metal contaminated clot shot Not sure where this is coming from, or in what context, but I'll just say this: Non-ionizing radiation has been proven, time and time again, to have non-thermal biological health effects. Most leading scientists on this issue today say it should be reclassified from 2B to a Class 1 carcinogen, same as smoking. The science is pretty damning at this point, and scientists are pretty concerned about 5G. Not sure why this is getting lumped in with conspiracies like vaccines causing the virus, or some totalitarian agenda here, but this is actually a well studied issue, and most science is in agreement that this is a pressing health issue in the 21st century. In the context of COVID-19, funnily enough, happen to get this paper this morning, though haven't looked at it extensively yet: https://www.jctres.com/en/issues/volume-7-issue-5/ Not the first paper of that nature, either. The claim that 5G is CAUSING the pandemic is clearly ludicrous, but it would be infactual to say it is not worsening it in some extent, just as surely as we know that factors like air pollution, chemical poisoning, and malnourishment would also put people at greater risk. It's rarely as simple as one simple direct cause as there are often many interrelated factors that mix together to suppress immune responses, one of the main effects of non-ionizing RF radiation. TL;DR Is 5G causing COVID-19? NO. Is it worsening the pandemic. Yes, although probably not to the extent that the conspiracy theorists would like people to believe, and probably more than a lot of people think, and certainly not a factor acting in isolation.

O, i'm sorry i can not just pass by this question. Well, i will try to explain now. First it is a site from far-right that are mostly banned from YouTube because google and corporate sponsors of ads doesn't want to have they logo and they products mile near with this content. Thus why it is mostly banned there. Let's examine what on a first page of it. Here is current (while a watching it) text and videos on front page: No comments. Yeah, sure, get bankrupted with Casino(!) need a true Genius from a capital letter "G". I mean how do you even can bankrupt with Casino - the house always wins! There is "no pandemic"? Wow this is just unbelievable lies. It is to early to say that. I'm pretty sure it will be eventually debunked. Absolute crazy anti vaccine lies. No comments. So i look right now to cherry pick things on front page of bitchute.com and it mostly pro-trump sucking up and crazy anti-vaccine content. Plus a lot of conspiracy theorists and people gloating somebody died\get killed. It is a garbage content that big corporation does not want on they platforms. I saw bitchute several times this years and i cant force myself to watch till the end even one video because i can't tolerate obvious lies, deception and craziness. YouTube and Google are de-platforming and demonetizing a lot of good channels and this is wrong. But bitchute is mostly right-wing garbage. It is not good right-wing content. It is bad right-wing content that are so toxic and so crazy that even the most greedy and shameless corporations does not not want to be mile near.

Yup, this is why real environmentalists don't support electric cars: https://www.protectthackerpass.org/update-from-peehee-muhuh-thacker-pass/ "Green" technologies are not "good" for the environment. The earth does not "want" electric cars. Nor does it want dams or solar panels. One destructive technology to the next is not "green".

And what's wrong with it ? Do tell ! Is it woke-chinese propaganda again ? I can't even open this website ! It constantly "loads" and that's it . It show me this sign , attached below. By the looks of it , sure seems like yet another "modern" soy website . I read it's a honey pot created by the FBI (NSA?) to attract people who doesn't agree with the government . Perhaps it's rumours , I don't know. Though , can't say for certain , it just won't let me in.

"SPECIAL REPORT: To build electric cars, manufacturers need to mine nickel. To dig up more nickel, a mining company plans to bulldoze a section of pristine rainforest. The “ethical dilemma” of when promising tech results in environmental harm:" https://www.nbcnews.com/specials/rise-of-electric-cars-endangers-last-frontier-philippines/index.html tags : musk , dems , california , hypocrisy in everything .

v13.5 r 5: "Your browser is not vulnerable!" natively.. most of the time, click Ctrl and F5, hmm why this is better than reload the page with browser button?.. Here: CSS Exfil Vulnerability Tester: https://www.mike-gualtieri.com/css-exfil-vulnerability-tester - This page tests to see if your browser is vulnerable to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) data leakage. If you are vulnerable, one way to protect yourself is to install the CSS Exfil Protection plugin for your browser. EDIT: Yes NOT vulnerable here, because it's "Dark Background and Light Text" extension, which defend me, if it's enabled on "Default" position (why this extension acts in this manner?..)

Orwellian type surveilance . BTW , MSFN did another update recently ! Again ! See the pic .

Why ? I do not experience any unusual behaviour or crashes , nothing out of the ordinary and MEGA works fine for me , just checked . Perhaps the other user has too low RAM ? Anyways , I do not notice increased RAM usage , all is fine . Many thanks !

I'm not convinced ! Real time logging is just the new lows . How far will they go ? Why would the need it ? It's not twitter ruled by the Indians . You do understand that it logs even deleted words ? Real-time.

it seems only the July 2021 & August 2021 security only updates [aka. KB5004302 & KB5005094 for Win8 / Server 2012] (and any W8.x big monthly "rollups" from July 2021 onwards) are the only updates that do remove activex flash. the Sep 2021 security only updates like KB5005607 for Win8 and KB5005627 for Win8.1, on the other hand, do NOT remove flash as Microsoft mistakenly said they would include flash removal but in reality these updates do not even touch the adobe flash files and the flash player control panel app remains intact

Oh okay, cool! Never forget Vista

i have a ivybridge i5 computer that wont run windows 2000 no matter what i try good luck at finding a fix

I wonder if this also affects Windows Server 2008, since it's essentially the exact same OS as Vista, the only difference being that it is due to receive security updates until January 2020. So it should be eligible for MSE support for another 3 years. Guess that's something I'll need to test.

W98_Slip: Slipstreaming Windows 98 SE. About: W98_Slip is a set of batch and script files used to slipstream updates into Windows 9x. Currently it has only been tested with Windows 98se, but with minor modifications it should work with Windows ME, Windows 98 first edition, and (with more extensive modification) maybe even Windows 95. [eta: Its main limitation is that it can only slipstream updated files. New files could be slipstreamed, but it would take editing by hand of the makecab script files.] Credits: W98_Slip is written by Glaurung. This project was inspired by TommyP's HFSlip project. Contact info: For information and support, visit the W98_Slip thread in the MSFN Windows 98se unofficial service pack Forum. Version history: This is version 0.1 (first release). Copyright and credits: These files are open source, released under the GPL. You may use them for any use, personal, non-profit, or commercial. But you do so with the understanding that, 1) these files are experimental, unwarranteed, and you use them completely at your own risk, and 2) using these files may invalidate your licence with Microsoft, and any license issues caused by using these files are totally your responsibility. Currently, these files are entirely my own work; I welcome contributions by others. You may redistribute these files, but if you do so, please give me credit, and leave in the contact information so users know where to go for information and updates. Warnings: These have been tested successfully with my OEM copy of Windows 98 SE. I have used them to do a maximum install from both DOS and within Windows with no error messages whatsoever. However, I don't own a retail copy or a bulk licence copy to test on. These files may or may not work with your copy of the OS. There is no guarantee, and no warrantee. There is no support. This project is something I did in my spare time. I'd like to help you if you have problems, but I may not be able to reply right away or at all. Another warning: My batch file writing skills are pretty basic. Currently there is little error checking or sanity control. If you follow the directions, it should work. If you don't, it won't work. w98_slip: Instructions for use. 0. You will need: 7zip or winzip, to extract updated files from hotfixes or from the unofficial service pack. Makecab (Microsoft cabinet SDK), for obvious reasons. Minitrue, used by W98_Slip to turn file lists into makecab scripts. 1. Unzip the files to a new folder on a disk with 1gb or more of free space. I've always put them in a top-level folder with a short file name. They might work for you if you put them in "My documents/my very long folder name with lots of spaces," and then again they might not. 2. Run w98_slip.bat. It will create some subfolders and display a short version of these directions. 3. Copy the win98 folder from your Windows 98 SE CD to the "source" folder. 3a. W98_slip expects some files to exist that are not required for setup to work properly. If the copy of the setup files that you have handy doesn't include setup.txt or setup*.wav, then when W98_slip tries to compress the updated source, makecab will fail with an error. If you can't find your original win98 CD, just run "makecab /f pass2.ddf" to see the missing files, then create some zero-byte dummy files with the same names. 4. Put the new versions of the files you want to update in the "updates" folder. 4a. If you want Windows Update to see the hotfixes you're slipstreaming as already applied, you need to edit an existing .inf file in the source to add the registry entries that tell windows update that you're already patched on that issue. Sorry I can't be more specific but the exact entries to make will depend on the exact files you are updating. 4b. Two restrictions on updated files: a) the files in the "updates" folder cannot be compressed (extract them first), and B) 98slip will only update files that already exist in the original (ie, w98_slip won't slipstream the q891711 update because it uses new files not in the original). You can add files not found in the original, but you'll have to edit the scripts by hand, and edit inf files in the source to take account of the new file. 5. Put the following programs in the "tools" folder: makecab.exe (downloadable as part of the Microsoft Cabinet SDK), and mtr.exe (part of minitrue, downloadable from http://www.idiotsdelight.net/minitrue/). Also, if you have used 98lite (pay version) to remove the DOS command line utilities from windows\command, reinstall them. 6. Run w98_slip.bat again. The program will pause at various points, both to let you see if any errors popped up and to allow you to cancel out if need be, so it's not possible to run it totally unattended. 7. The slipstreamed install files will be in slipped\win98. 8. If you run w98_slip.bat again, it will ask you if you want to reuse your previous decompressed source. This is mainly a time saving measure, since decompression takes several minutes. It will also ask you if you want to reuse your previous makecab scripts. This is in case you modified the scripts for whatever reason. Finally, it will ask if you want to recreate the entire slipstream or just the precopy.cab files. Again, this is a timesaving measure for people who mainly want to modify the .inf files. Things to note: 1. The install files will not be the same sizes as the originals, and there will be slightly fewer of them. This is because w98_slip is designed to generate the same number of cab files regardless of the size of your updated files. 2. In your slipstreamed install, Sfc.exe may not work properly (I haven't tested it so am unsure), as it contains hardcoded references to specific .cab file names. Fixing this would require hacking the binary file default.sfc. What the files do: pass1.ddf and pass2.ddf are makecab directive file stubs (everything makecab needs except the list of files to compress). The file lists for makecab are generated by w98_slip on the fly using minitrue. mt*.txt are minitrue scripts. mt.txt, mt1.txt, and mt2.txt handle the conversion of the three layout.inf files to makecab directive files. mt_fl.txt and mt_pc.txt handle the conversion of the list of files contained in the cabs into makecab directive files. mt_inf.txt handles the problem that driver19 and driver20.cab don't exist in the fileset w98_slip produces, but are referenced in a couple of inf files. I made it external to help simplify the process of adapting w98_slip to work with other versions of the OS. w98_slip.zip