All Activity

Don't think there is a good way to remove defender. But WinNTSetup's tweak should completely disable it. This can be reversed later, it needed.

This may be worth a try (unable to try here at work) -- https://gist.github.com/nuxodin/3ae174f2a6a112df3ccad22459237a91 https://caniuse.com/mdn-api_submitevent_submitter

AstroSkipper, try to switch extensions.webextensions.remote - false

yes there is, and it is what alacrán and jfx would probably call "brute force", a deletion of both files from the disk and keys from the registry. just delete all occurrences.

@roytam1 When trying to upload a file to my account on codeberg.org in New Moon 28, it is impossible to access the items in the menu "Add File". These items are not clickable and therefore inaccessible. The mouse pointer can't capture the menu items but only those which are located underneath.. Do you have an account there? Any ideas? Here is a screenshot of this issue: And this is the output of the Web Console on my Codeberg website: This browser doesn't have "SubmitEvent" support, use a tricky method to polyfill index.js:20:188978 So, it seems to be "polyfillable". Any clue about "SubmitEvent"? Greetings, AstroSkipper

Old Farts

Old Photographs

Weld

Thanks for replying! Unfortunately, I don't understand what you wanted to say or ask. I never used Adguard with multi-process mode in Mypal 68 but only uBlock Origin. That would be great.

Of course, we are only speculating here. Unfortunately, I have not yet been able to discover any error message or anything that would be helpful in investigating the cause of this issue. I wouldn't even have noticed this error, as I was actually only running Mypal 68 in single-process mode. I tried the multi-process mode just to see if it works well on my old computer and noticed that Codeberg.org runs stable in this mode. As already described, Codeberg.org stupidly leads to crashes in single-process mode.And it was @feodor2 last year who told me in his issues on GitHub that Mypal 68 produces less errors in multi-process mode than in single-process mode and would be therefore the more stable mode. So, I wanted to give this mode a try.

@Cixert Perhaps by running Syprep with Mini Setup option enable on your XP installation: https://www.petenetlive.com/KB/Article/0000599 https://toolscenter.lenovofiles.com/help/index.jsp?topic=%2Fdpsccm%2Fdpsccm_t_running_sysprep_w2003.html Reseal the computer with the option. Just restart the computer at the end of the process. That will launch the Mini Setup and if your computer is ACPI compatible, the setup will switch from a standard PC to ACPI. A good advice: do a disk image of the computer before, just in the case... Regards

Ooops, bad answer! Sorry...

LOL, calm down!

I think we don't really know the real troubling factor and just speculating so far. If you force affinity to one core, then OS will schedule that program on that one core, so theoretically, things wouldn't be able to truly run in parallel in that program. Regarding 32-bit and 64-bit, they're just 2 modes and the OS must setup things for 32-bit programs, so I guess 32-bit context is as real as on 32-bit CPUs. That one core on multi-core CPU will obviously be different than the core of other single-core CPUs, but I guess you could say the same for different single-core CPUs.

@genieautravail If 5 users will gether, okey next version will have SSE. What doesn't suit your already existing version, because new version is more bloated and likely has new errors. @AstroSkipper What about other things or this is happens only with Adguard, soon I shall make testing on P4 single core, @AstroSkipper@NotHereToPlayGames Multiprocess is not about cpu cores. Windows OS multiprocess itself since 1993 I think, and Intel 386 the first CPU which supports multiprocess. Also Firefox is not like Chrome here, they try be it latter at 100's, I think making every piece on the separate process is overkill. In general mp is good for performance, and stability too. If you have ar least 2gb ram prefer stay mp. Furthermore POSready updates installed everywhere on my side, never heard about issues with this.

REASON I think I have found the reason why the BIOS updates only supported hard drives aligned to 2048 and the error NTLDR is missing aligned to 63 occurred. And the cause is the usual one on slot 1 motherboards "a RAM memory bad contact". I was having more and more problems, hard drives when starting Windows that sometimes wouldn't read a file and finally the Windows CD-ROM said it wouldn't read a file when booting. Curiously, once Windows started, there were no problems, only files were missing from the boot. The BIOS said that I had 392 MiB RAM, but I removed and cleaned the SD-RAM modules and it turned out that I have 512 MiB RAM. Now the disks aligned to sector 63 are read, well except for a Seagate 40 GB that does not boot at either 63 or 2048. The funny thing is that it does boot if I first detect in the BIOS a Seagate with 20 GB and change the hard drive without updating information. In any case, the latest BIOS update v3.08 continues to cause several start attempts on all hard drives when resetting the system. Which v3.07 doesn't do. The problem is that only v3.08 supports hard drives with +32GB. In conclusion, this motherboard is very very problematic as a whole.

Memory read error has to do with a program trying to read outside of what is allowed for it in the OS. It is not a physical error in the hardware. It's a common fault. Usually memory errors proceed silently because there is no mechanism for detecting them, or the PC would hang. I went to github.com using New Moon and tried to sign up or log in. I was presented with an unbelieveably resource intensive screen of flying through a starfield and a greeting appearing one letter a time as if being typed by a person. It should be just an ordinary login prompt. That design might fit an "art gallery" or a music album, not a site for programming. It was unusable on a Core 2 Duo. But when I opened the page in Opium, expecting it to go a bit faster, I got none of the animations. The login box had the same design, but appeared instantly.

Dietmar knows how to switch properly from Standard PC to ACPI. @Dietmar can you show him how you did this?

R545 and later no longer work on 1607. I've tried modifying R545 and R550 by overwriting OS version in nvlddmkm.sys, but only got error code 37. Now I am using 538.49. Because 1607 is too old to support latest DX12, I can't start Persona 3 Reload on Steam. So I have to use vkd3d-proton 2.12 and dxvk 2.2 to start the game. However, I can access digital art book and OST without converting to Vulkan. I think the game crashed because 1607 does not support ray tracing. Besides, latest OBS Studio 30.1.2 no longer works on 1607.

I'm keeping it. I will *not* be keeping any Supermium builds - at least not yet, I'll try future builds, but none to date will work on my system - NONE. While real hardware is the goal here, tyr Supermium in a VM. Not sure why it should matter, but it does! Run Supermium in a VM and you WILL throw your computer out the window, throw the keyboard out right behind it, flush your mouse down the toilet, and take your printer outside and hit it with a baseball bat. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N9wsjroVlu8

Use - body, body *, body h1, body h2, body h3, body h4 {font-family: unset !important;}

They gave me a double penalty for posting a link to a browser compatible with Windows 7 that supposedly had pirated content. They told me it was permanent, but now I don't see it on my profile. It doesn't let me put some links to the forum but it does let me put some links outside the forum I think.

I have inserted another hard drive with a XP portable with ACPI installed. Now, with the original BIOS old version the BSOD 0xA5 with the message "ACPI not fully supported" occurs, so I updated the BIOS and now the system boots correctly. So the computer is compatible with ACPI. On the original hard drive I think the problem is that the ACPI.sys driver is not installed. It does not appear in the XP boot process even though I have changed the HAL to ACPI. So I conclude that in a original Standard PC installation it is not possible to change to HAL ACPI. Do you know if there is a way to install ACPI.SYS on a Standard PC installation? (then I would change the HAL files)

OK - thanks!

Ok, maybe I'll keep Thorium on my system then, so it appears to be compared to 114? Or I think you said it behaves such as to reflect this? Just want to make clear - this isn't stressing me or upsetting me - I quite enjoy testing new browsers.