All Activity
- Past hour
-
Here is a link to an official website of Avast where is clearly stated that a key for more recent Avast Free Antivirus (including the version 18) is no longer needed: https://www.avast.com/registration-free-antivirus#windows Additionally, a screenshot of this website: Kind regards, AstroSkipper
- 915 replies
-
- Security
- Antimalware
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
check out "chrome://flags" and "chrome://gpu". In flags, you can disable rasterization manually without touching the acceleration settings in Chrome and then verify the result in chrome://gpu. FYI, I ran some more tests to demonstrate what I was saying before about benefiting from disabling hardware rasterization on older GPUs. In all cases, the CPU is a 4th gen Haswell. For the iGPU, the tests were run on Windows 7. For the 1660, it was run on Windows 10. iGPU with rasterization enabled: iGPU with rasterization disabled: GeForce 1660 with rasterization enabled: The GTX1660 is about 5 times faster in Chrome than the integrated GPU and about twice as fast as the GCN 1st Gen Radeon HD7770 (the HD7770 test was done with Thorium AVX on a 3rd gen Ivy Bridge though, but that probably doesn't make any difference). Who said software rendering was dead?
-
-
I'm having the same colour problem with my GTX 960 (4 GB VRAM) graphics cards on Windows 7 and Windows 8.1 when using : Firefox + Hardware Acceleration and HDMI set to Limited in NVidia Control Panel This problem does not occur in Microsoft Edge. Haven't tested other browsers. I don't remember having this problem with my Nvidia GT 710 or 610M (laptop) but I was using an older driver version with those. Probably pre-400.00 . Need to test it on W10/W11 to see if the problem exists there as well at some point.
-
I'm not sure about the registration 'cause I'm on Avast Premier which I renew every 3 years as it also covers my Android mobile phone beside XP for my family and I. Up until now, I haven't had any issues and it happily accepted the key every time. Even in this very moment, I'm with Avast. I'm not sure about the free version key, though, but if it doesn't work, try posting on the Avast forum or ask the support, I'm sure they're gonna help you.
- 915 replies
-
1
-
- Security
- Antimalware
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
- Today
-
This patch is missing: https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/570
-
ProxHTTPSProxy and HTTPSProxy in Windows XP for future use
AstroSkipper replied to AstroSkipper's topic in Windows XP
My main article even offers a Table of Contents at the begining of the first post. In your case, read from the section 9. to 9.3.3! Following the table of contents, the download can be found in the section 11.2.2.. The download package contains a short and a detailed documentation. What else is supposed to be needed? I think nothing. To answer your question whether it is installed or portable, it is more portable than installed. To be more detailed, you have to install a certificate and some registry settings to let the ProxHTTPSProxy's PopMenu TLS 1.3 3V3 run correctly. All has been sufficiently described. But nothing of it is harmful and can easily be removed if necessary. And that's all I'm going to say about it. Read first, then try it out and only if something doesn't work, I'll be happy to help. However, one thing should be clear, I am not a fan of spoon-feeding.- 807 replies
-
- TLS protocols
- ProxHTTPSProxy
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
ProxHTTPSProxy and HTTPSProxy in Windows XP for future use
Anbima replied to AstroSkipper's topic in Windows XP
We have written about this in the following thread: https://msfn.org/board/topic/175170-root-certificates-and-revoked-certificates-for-windows-xp/page/42/ Which file do I have to use if I want to install ProxHTTPSProxy's PopMenu TLS 1.3 3V3? You have listed so many. Is this “portable” or is it “installed? Is the whole “menu” required here, or can it also be installed “small”? If so, what do I need for this?- 807 replies
-
- TLS protocols
- ProxHTTPSProxy
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Chalkboard seems to me to be undeveloped. For online testing, wouldn't it be better to use Motion Mark? https://browserbench.org/
-
ProxHTTPSProxy and HTTPSProxy in Windows XP for future use
AstroSkipper replied to AstroSkipper's topic in Windows XP
As I don't use 360Chrome 13.5.1030, I can't judge what your problem is. And only one sentence without a concrete description of your issue is simply too little information. BTW, the installation of ProxHTTPSProxy's PopMenu TLS 1.3 3V3 can be done in minutes. So, just try it!- 807 replies
-
- TLS protocols
- ProxHTTPSProxy
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
@feodor2 - I must say the latest version (68.14.1b) is working great for me so far on XP. I have D3D and Multiprocess enabled and so far it is completely stable. I'm very tempted to use this instead of Thorium. Great job!
-
Do you use Policies in your browsers?
Sampei.Nihira replied to Sampei.Nihira's topic in Web Browsers
No MSFN members are using the policies? I could never use my Microsoft Edge without having any policies set up. Flags are often removed over time, in Chromium-based browsers, and only proper use of policies allows a desired feature to be available again that is no longer available. There is also the case of some features being available exclusively through policies. This happens in both Chromium-based browsers as when I blocked the automatic addition of search engines to the list,and eliminated Bing Search. A former colleague of mine uses the right policy available in Firefox because he does not like the automatic browser update. However, I will include the policies I use in Edge. Thank you for your attention. -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
roytam1 replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Notice: twitter.com is now migrated to x.com, so you will need to copy twitter's UAO to x.com -
ProxHTTPSProxy and HTTPSProxy in Windows XP for future use
Anbima replied to AstroSkipper's topic in Windows XP
If I install ProxHTTSProxy or HTTPSProxy, will the page https://valid-isrgrootx2.letsencrypt.org/ be transmitted encrypted with 360Chrome 13.5.1030?- 807 replies
-
- TLS protocols
- ProxHTTPSProxy
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Root Certificates and Revoked Certificates for Windows XP
Anbima replied to heinoganda's topic in Windows XP
If I install ProxHTTPSProxy's PopMenu TLS 1.3 3V3, will the encryption be available again? -
killertgl joined the community
-
zoy963999 joined the community
-
Hi, I'm having a weird issue with StartAllBack on Windows 11 where if I click on a taskbar item and then move the mouse upwards, it acts as if I hovered over the first taskbar item and shows the preview. It also acts like I right clicked the current taskbar item and shows the jump list. On the normal Windows taskbar, moving the mouse upwards in this way just puts the item into the draggable state where you can reorder it to the left or right. Video of this happening here: https://streamable.com/u1aq0w
-
sblectric joined the community
-
Posting test: string boot .ini causes HTTP 403 forbidden error
Dixel replied to jaclaz's topic in Site & Forum Issues
-
Mule
-
Well, Safe Mode with networking is pretty safe. There was no internet connection regardless, and you can always physically disconnect to be sure. That made it work for WinXP removing Avast free version at least. It takes a few minutes, as opposed to a few seconds, to boot up quite but compared to wasting hours or hacking the registry, it's pretty painless. Avast work at all with Win XP now? It seemed impossible to register to continue use, The permanent key they publish wasn't accepted by my install, and anyway it couldnt get updates for quite a while. Have now moved to Clam.
- 915 replies
-
- Security
- Antimalware
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with: