37 minutes ago, NotHereToPlayGames said:

Because MSFN would cease to exist if it weren't for -

1) People with very old hardware trying to run modern web browsers
2) People with very new hardware trying run or "look like" very old operating systems

That's exactly why I support the idea of MSFN, and actually the reason for all my efforts here.  In my case, let Windows XP live forever or at least as long as possible. 

Edited May 18, 20242 yr by AstroSkipper
Update of content

11 hours ago, hidao said:

Why did you want to use one core ?

I wanted too see if it would be running as terrible on my end on single core as others here have been saying.

18 hours ago, NotHereToPlayGames said:

Because MSFN would cease to exist if it weren't for -

1) People with very old hardware trying to run modern web browsers
2) People with very new hardware trying run or "look like" very old operating systems

In China, we'll talk to you : This is a disease, it needs to be treated...

5 hours ago, hidao said:

In China, we'll talk to you : This is a disease, it needs to be treated...

In France one can get seriously beaten up for a talk like that.

11 hours ago, hidao said:

In China, we'll talk to you : This is a disease, it needs to be treated...

If that's supposed to be a joke, then it certainly wasn't your best. 
If you meant it seriously, then I'm afraid you're completely out of place here. 
Just a hint. Supermium -> Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes. So, either old browsers for old hardware under old OSes or browsers (not the newest ones) for more modern hardware under old OSes. Your choice, old or old. 

Edited May 19, 20242 yr by AstroSkipper
Update of content

11 hours ago, D.Draker said:

In France one can get seriously beaten up for a talk like that.

It's a crime,and will be throw into jail

Edited May 19, 20242 yr by hidao

New release:

Supermium 122.0.6261.152 (R6) - SECURITY PATCH
https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/releases/tag/v122-r6

 

On 5/2/2024 at 9:36 PM, NotHereToPlayGames said:

VERY IMPRESSED so far !!!

Even in a single-core VirtualBox VM running XP x86 SP3.

"Ungoogled" is still not fully ungoogled - there should be no "1 app (Web Store)" in a fully ungoogled variation.

Fixed!

"If using --ungoogled Chrome Store cannot be used"

https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/593

 

On 5/13/2024 at 11:27 AM, NotHereToPlayGames said:

  We used to call it "net savvy".  And it is the "net savvy" consumer that has NEVER been hit with malware yet also NEVER runs real-time "protection".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6uSVVCmOH5w

I've seen that video before.

I am unable to replicate.

Granted, my XP install *never* (and I mean *NEVER*) connects to the internet *without* Proxomitron filtering/blocking those connections.

Personally, I would love to see this same exact "test" be performed on 7, 8, 10, and 11.

Do you really think for one second that Malwarebytes won't find similar with 7, 8, 10, and 11 "if installed the same way as the test-case XP" ???

Edited May 20, 20242 yr by NotHereToPlayGames

I'd also add that *NONE* of us MSFN XP Users have a "setup" like that BIASED video used.

They opened all ports, set everything to lowest security possible, didn't NAT on LAN behind a router, you name it.

They *WANTED* to be *INFECTED* and so they "configured" their XP to *BECOME* infected.

By all means, DO THAT TYPE OF SETUP in 7, 8, 10, and 11 and "report your findings".  

Edited May 20, 20242 yr by NotHereToPlayGames

3 hours ago, NotHereToPlayGames said:

I'd also add that *NONE* of us MSFN XP Users have a "setup" like that BIASED video used.

They opened all ports, set everything to lowest security possible, didn't NAT on LAN behind a router, you name it.

They *WANTED* to be *INFECTED* and so they "configured" their XP to *BECOME* infected.

By all means, DO THAT TYPE OF SETUP in 7, 8, 10, and 11 and "report your findings".  

Probably if the video test had used a well-configured browser,started with limited user privileges (I was using PsExec) had set DEP active also for the browser.....and other small details that are not worth reporting in this thread because it is OT nothing would have happened.

8 hours ago, Milkinis said:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6uSVVCmOH5w

... Not a coincidence, for sure , but this very same YT clip was the topic of a Pale Moon Forum thread that soon escalated to name-calling  and bad-mouthing MSFN members using the New Moon browser on WinXP today ... 

43 minutes ago, VistaLover said:

Not a coincidence

Yep, saw that.  Somebody posted a screencap because now you have to be signed in to be able to read that forum.

So XP is still actively targeted? Unrealistic example, but still, one wrong step and baam!