AstroSkipper Posted August 1, 2023 Posted August 1, 2023 5 hours ago, WSC4 said: When you say Chrome 360, I take it your are referring to the 360Chrome found here: https://msfn.org/board/topic/184624-arcticfoxienotheretoplaygames-360chrome-v1352036-rebuild-1/ I downloaded this and tried to get it to run. It would not open any web page. I tried the ungoogled and regular builds. I found this also which seems to be the same: 360 Extreme Explorer. https://msfn.org/board/topic/182876-360-extreme-explorer-modified-version/ I downloaded version 13 and tried to get it to run and the same problem also. Hello @WSC4! Issues related to 360Chrome and other Chrome forks should be posted in their corresponding threads. We have a lot of them. FYI, this thread is actually about @roytam1's browser editions. 4
nicolaasjan Posted August 1, 2023 Posted August 1, 2023 Cross-posting this here: https://msfn.org/board/topic/184944-could-web-enviornment-integrity-block-old-operating-systems/ 3
VistaLover Posted August 1, 2023 Posted August 1, 2023 (edited) On 8/1/2023 at 1:00 AM, UCyborg said: The New CSS Reset stylesheet alone is enough to disqualify old 360Chrome 13.5 (:where pseudo-selector). And missing product images and other mess on the laptops' page. ... and: On 8/1/2023 at 1:30 AM, VistaLover said: But, guess what? Kafan MiniBrowser seems to display correctly those laptop photos On 8/1/2023 at 1:30 AM, VistaLover said: So, it's a feature first implemented in Chromium 87 ... ... Today was less hot here , thus I had a second chance to research this more diligently ... According to MDN: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/:where#browser_compatibility the ":where()" pseudo-selector was first implemented in Mozilla Firefox 78 and Chrome 88; but, as most of us know, Kafan MiniBrowser was based on Chromium 87 ; some investigation revealed that my own copy of it is able to display properly the MediaMarkt laptop/notebook entries because, in tweaking my MiniBrowser copy, I had enabled below flag: chrome://flags/#enable-experimental-web-platform-features Turns out that flag activates (among other things) CSS features that have been officially introduced in Chromium 88+; indeed, with that flag disabled (the default setting): but with it enabled (i.e. how I have it myself): Sorry for any eventual misunderstanding ... Edited August 1, 2023 by VistaLover 1
WSC4 Posted August 2, 2023 Posted August 2, 2023 14 hours ago, AstroSkipper said: Hello @WSC4! Issues related to 360Chrome and other Chrome forks should be posted in their corresponding threads. We have a lot of them. FYI, this thread is actually about @roytam1's browser editions. Sorry about that. Since page 122, a lot mention 360Chrome with images and I got carried away. I do realise this is roytam1's browsers thread. I'll remove my post.
mina7601 Posted August 2, 2023 Posted August 2, 2023 (edited) 3 minutes ago, WSC4 said: I'll remove my post. Why remove, when you could simply ask a moderator to move your post to the correct thread? Edited August 2, 2023 by mina7601 2
AstroSkipper Posted August 2, 2023 Posted August 2, 2023 (edited) 9 minutes ago, WSC4 said: I'll remove my post. You do not need to remove this post. It was just a hint if you have further issues with 360Chrome or other Chrome forks. The discussion here was mainly about web compatibility in terms of two websites, mediamarkt.de and saturn.de which were tested in 360Chrome and Kafan browser, too, just for comparison purpose. Edited August 2, 2023 by AstroSkipper 4
Milkinis Posted August 2, 2023 Posted August 2, 2023 On 8/1/2023 at 5:37 AM, WSC4 said: https://msfn.org/board/topic/184624-arcticfoxienotheretoplaygames-360chrome-v1352036-rebuild-1/ I downloaded this and tried to get it to run. It would not open any web page. I tried the ungoogled and regular builds. are you using a WIFI network ? if the chrome loader file doesn't work then switch over to the internal chrome/application folder file.
WSC4 Posted August 2, 2023 Posted August 2, 2023 Hi Milkinis, I am not using Wi-Fi and I tried the Chrome loader file and the 360chrome.exe in the application folder. Because this is roytam1's thread, I have moved discussions on this to these threads: https://msfn.org/board/topic/182876-360-extreme-explorer-modified-version/page/140/ https://msfn.org/board/topic/184624-arcticfoxienotheretoplaygames-360chrome-v1352036-rebuild-1/page/35/ See you over there if you have more ideas. Thanks and regards. 2
roytam1 Posted August 2, 2023 Author Posted August 2, 2023 On 8/1/2023 at 12:16 AM, VistaLover said: In case no-one here noticed it already , "our" roytam1 is now formally mentioned inside the "official" UXP repo: https://repo.palemoon.org/MoonchildProductions/UXP/commit/7f8ea9ae2f92b71eefcd1dc286baaf529cc5686a Thanks to Brian Smith (aka dbsoft), the MacOS dev member of MCP ... this could be earlier than you posted. (but this is not my work as a whole) https://repo.palemoon.org/MoonchildProductions/UXP/commit/e56b7b826d6f4f8cb1fc4bcd06fce7786540784c 2
VistaLover Posted August 2, 2023 Posted August 2, 2023 (edited) 13 minutes ago, roytam1 said: this could be earlier than you posted. ... Indeed , but your (GitHub/MSFN) username (roytam1) isn't explicitly mentioned there, just a link (8a0897d23f) to your GitHub repo and code .,, Edited August 2, 2023 by VistaLover
dmiranda Posted August 3, 2023 Posted August 3, 2023 (edited) I congratulate the new owner of basilisk, @basilisk-dev, for setting the stage for this change, and Moonchild for having reformed its development team into a more amicable gang that what used to be the case long (hopefully) ago. Above all, I congratulate and thank @roytam1, for the consistency and quality of his work over the years: whenever the history of the decade long siege the oligopolistic gang imposed (mostly unsuccessfully) against XP just to maintain rents is told (I'm sure there will be a PhD or two out there with the capacity and interest to do so), you will be remembered, mate (and those who were helpful to you). They shall not pass. Edited August 3, 2023 by dmiranda 4
RamonUn Posted August 3, 2023 Posted August 3, 2023 (edited) Nice to see more JS features implemented in the UXP engine. I thought that https://scoop.sh/ would work now but I still get a blank page and the `ReferenceError: BigUint64Array is not defined` error, with the latest Serpent build. Is it expected behavior? Maybe I should flip a flag to get the BigInt stuff? or this specific is not yet implemented? EDIT: Well I answered myself the question, the Big(U)Int64Array stuff have been merged just a few days ago and are not yet in Roy's builds... Edited August 3, 2023 by RamonUn
Slavich Posted August 3, 2023 Posted August 3, 2023 Hello. Allow me to post a few more screenshots with errors reflecting web pages in the New Moon browser. https://ibb.co/94fdHqG https://ibb.co/41hFfcQ https://ibb.co/dG1VwQs https://ibb.co/CpypBDX https://ibb.co/0cVf7z1 Thanks.
basilisk-dev Posted August 4, 2023 Posted August 4, 2023 On 8/2/2023 at 8:31 PM, dmiranda said: I congratulate the new owner of basilisk, @basilisk-dev, for setting the stage for this change, and Moonchild for having reformed its development team into a more amicable gang that what used to be the case long (hopefully) ago. Thank you, although I don't think there's anything to congratulate me for. Being nice to others, even if you disagree with them or the things that they do, is not a difficult task (unless your name is Matt A Tobin). 2
Milkinis Posted August 4, 2023 Posted August 4, 2023 43 minutes ago, basilisk-dev said: Thank you, although I don't think there's anything to congratulate me for. what other web browsers do you use besides Basilisk ?
Recommended Posts