rainyd Posted April 22, 2023 Posted April 22, 2023 5 hours ago, alzcore397 said: can you install this version in an existing intallation? Of course you can - my update was smooth (64-bit). 3
adi2137px Posted April 22, 2023 Posted April 22, 2023 7 hours ago, alzcore397 said: can you install this version in an existing intallation? yeah, i just ran exe and it updated just fine(atleast from .129) 4
D.Draker Posted April 30, 2023 Posted April 30, 2023 Chromium: 115.0.5737.0 . Release date: April 27, 2023, unsurprisingly - it doesn't work on either Win 7/8/8.1. It is now SIX major versions above the last for these OSes, yet they're still in the main OS section of the forum. Remember how fast Vista was dumped into the "older OS" bin. Will the so-called "extended kernel for win 7" allow to run anything beyond ver.109 to run ? I highly doubt that ! Anyone, confirm, thanks. The official GitHub mirror of the Chromium source : https://www.gitclear.com/open_repos/chromium/chromium/release/115.0.5737.0
yoltboy01 Posted April 30, 2023 Author Posted April 30, 2023 Nah not true. Latest Chromium Build working fine on 8.1: imgur.com/a/lE6buzI As much as I respect @D.Draker for all of your work and effort, I never really got your intention, of why you want to see Windows 7 and 8.1 getting removed from the Main OS Section from MSFN. No one really complains about this. Why even "downgrade" them to that section. They cannot be compared to Vista, especially Windows 7, since they are more popular and many programs still support them. I got that you dont like Windows 7 and 8, but it is really not up to you to decide which OS is "worth" staying in a section or not. Regards 6
mjd79 Posted April 30, 2023 Posted April 30, 2023 I wonder if version 115 works for him on Vista's extended kernel. Also, I confirm that version 115 works on 8.1. 3
mina7601 Posted April 30, 2023 Posted April 30, 2023 (edited) From my testing, VxKex prevented the "The procedure entry point SetProcessMitigationPolicy could not be located in the dynamic link library KERNEL32.dll." error from appearing when opening Chromium 115 on Windows 7, but Chromium 115 still doesn't start. Adding --no-sandbox made no effect. Edited April 30, 2023 by mina7601 1
mjd79 Posted April 30, 2023 Posted April 30, 2023 41 minutes ago, mina7601 said: From my testing, VxKex prevented the "The procedure entry point SetProcessMitigationPolicy could not be located in the dynamic link library KERNEL32.dll." error from appearing when opening Chromium 115 on Windows 7, but Chromium 115 still doesn't start. Adding --no-sandbox made no effect. The highest version possible to run on Windows 7 at the moment is something around 111.0.5535~111.0.5545. Does VxKex run version 110.0.5481? 1
mina7601 Posted April 30, 2023 Posted April 30, 2023 11 minutes ago, mjd79 said: Does VxKex run version 110.0.5481? No, it does not. 1
legacyfan Posted April 30, 2023 Posted April 30, 2023 8 hours ago, yoltboy01 said: Nah not true. Latest Chromium Build working fine on 8.1: imgur.com/a/lE6buzI As much as I respect @D.Draker for all of your work and effort, I never really got your intention, of why you want to see Windows 7 and 8.1 getting removed from the Main OS Section from MSFN. No one really complains about this. Why even "downgrade" them to that section. They cannot be compared to Vista, especially Windows 7, since they are more popular and many programs still support them. I got that you dont like Windows 7 and 8, but it is really not up to you to decide which OS is "worth" staying in a section or not. Regards because he's a big vista fan and thinks any other person is weird for not using it like him 1
D.Draker Posted April 30, 2023 Posted April 30, 2023 11 hours ago, yoltboy01 said: Nah not true. Latest Chromium Build working fine on 8.1: imgur.com/a/lE6buzI As much as I respect @D.Draker for all of your work and effort, I never really got your intention, of why you want to see Windows 7 and 8.1 getting removed from the Main OS Section from MSFN. No one really complains about this. Why even "downgrade" them to that section. They cannot be compared to Vista, especially Windows 7, since they are more popular and many programs still support them. I got that you dont like Windows 7 and 8, but it is really not up to you to decide which OS is "worth" staying in a section or not. Regards Thanks ! It's NOT intention, it's fairness and objectiveness. They ditched Vista years ago, how could you compare that state of Vista to the current times ? Where did I say "I want to" ? Better not even start about the "popularity". Most popular here seems to be XP and 98, a bit of Vista. Just look at the trending topics. What was the last popular Windows 7 thread here ? Right, none. This one (mostly off-topic) can't be defined as popular, here poor users just cry about the dead win7, without showing any actual saving (technical) suggestions. I too get that you like Windows 8/1 that seem to run the new UN-sandboxed Chrome with the help of hacks. (but this is not what this topic about). 9 hours ago, mjd79 said: I wonder if version 115 works for him on Vista's extended kernel. Also, I confirm that version 115 works on 8.1. Here, another example of off-topic questions.
D.Draker Posted April 30, 2023 Posted April 30, 2023 3 hours ago, legacyfan said: because he's a big vista fan and thinks any other person is weird for not using it like him Thanks for you unbreakable will , courage and bravery to spam the hell out of all technical topics at MSFN. I'm proud of your wisdom and knowledge ! 2
D.Draker Posted May 1, 2023 Posted May 1, 2023 9 hours ago, mjd79 said: The highest version possible to run on Windows 7 at the moment is something around 111.0.5535~111.0.5545. Does VxKex run version 110.0.5481? Just in case you suggest to run Chrome with NO sandbox again : Google themselves recommend using another browser rather than using Chrome without sandbox. So the last 109 chrome is safer to use on Windows7/8/8/1. https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/68832/what-does-the-chromium-option-no-sandbox-mean
Tangy Posted May 2, 2023 Posted May 2, 2023 Opera has been updated from version : 95.0.4635.80 to Version: 95.0.4635.84 1
Cixert Posted May 3, 2023 Posted May 3, 2023 (edited) Officially Chromium for Windows 7 will continue to receive updates from Google, these are based on Chromium 109 and these will be done with Thorium Browser.* See here in the old version section: https://chromium.woolyss.com/ Main website: Github https://github.com/Alex313031/thorium-win7 Release Standard version https:/ /github.com/Alex313031/Thorium-Win/releases Release AVX2 version https://github.com/Alex313031/Thorium-AVX2/releases Releases SSE2, SSE3, ARM, Linux, Android, etc. https://github.com/Alex313031/Thorium-Special/releases?page=2 Note: I inform the authors that the SSE2 32-bit version is identified as a virus by several Anti-Malware https://github.com/Alex313031/Thorium-Special/issues/51 *I think I have read in the past that this browser was officially supported by Google, right now I can't find information to confirm it Edited May 4, 2023 by Tripredacus removed link to warez site
NotHereToPlayGames Posted May 3, 2023 Posted May 3, 2023 (edited) I advise you to remove the main website link for Thorium. A moderator "pointed me" with a "permanent" point for posting that link in the past. Edited May 3, 2023 by NotHereToPlayGames 1
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now