awergh

yeah its not oe thats intergrated into the os its ie and you can remove oe with add and remove

really the main thing that id want is shortcuts so i can go Ctrl-S to save it

generally i like it but i want the menus at the top of the screen permanently not in the second row.

98lite

gooogle search for abandonware

true but it cant be installed on a fat32 partition, just like you have to install drivers for the mouse to get the scrollwheel to work and drivers for usb support

not even a 256 colour driver, didnt windows 3.1 have a generic super vga driver

Either Safer Networking Ltd. or Symantec leaving the Anti Spyware Coalition... [link] 29. September 2006 From March 2005 to December 2005, Symantec labeled Spybot-S&D as incompatible to Norton Ghost, and endangering backups, with no reason given to us in 19 months now. Since October 2005, Norton Internet Security has told users that Spybot-S&D would be incompatible and they had to remove Spybot-S&D. Eleven months later, Symantec has given us just one explanation that was mostly invented and not fitting. Even though Symantec again promised changes, they have now released Norton Internet Security 2007 which again urges the user to uninstall Spybot-S&D. We would have loved to work with them to remove any incompatibility, but although they were eager to tell their customers about these so-called 'incompatibilities', even threats of legal action could not persuade Symantec to give us any details. Well, actually they promised they would send us details, but those promises haven't been fullfilled for nearly a year. Is Symantecs Quality Assurance department so bad that they can't either find the old reports or re-test? Both of us are members of the ASC, the Anti Spyware Coalition, a group of anti-spyware companies working together - in theory. The ASC has discussed Best Practices for half a year now. Sadly, this seems to only affect practices against malware creators, while coalition members are allowed to fight each other as much as they want. If we created spyware instead of anti-spyware, we probably would laugh various body parts at seeing how one anti-spyware application removes the other. Arbitration by the ASC has only resulted in broken promises by Symantec. We will therefore bring a motion in front of the ASC to expel Symantec for damaging the ASC through its practices of illegal improper competition and libel, resulting even in malware creators being able to spread their malware better. Should this motion be rejected by a majority of ASC members, we most likely leave this coalition as it would then appear that ASC is favoring libel as a proper way of competition. If you think that anti-spyware companies should fight spyware creators instead of each other, please send an email to ASC members of your choice, found here, and/or to the ASC itself, at asc@cdt.org. Following that, thinking on how we could stop Symantec, we have two options: taking expensive legal steps, or behaving the same way as Symantec, accepting the removal of a competitor as a "legit" step. Should we add detection for Norton Internet Security 2006 and 2007 as Malware or Possibly UnPopular Software (PUPS)? Yes, detect NIS completely! Yes, but detect only some harmless files to wake up people. No, please waste our donations to go through legal channels, instead of using them to fight malware. None of the above. Please note that under ASCs definition, technology that is implemented in ways that impairs user control over material changes that affecs their system security, in other words software that reduces system security like NIS does, falls under the term Spyware (and Other Potentially Unwanted Technologies), so adding NIS to the detection would not be revenge, but a strict following of the ASC definitions. We have started a poll in our forums where you can vote! http://forums.spybot.info/showthread.php?t=7683 lots of complaining and ranting about nav/nis

http://www.safer-networking.org/en/article...d-managers.html this is a bit old but it gives a list of a lot of download managers with spyware / adware

personally i hated c&c gold and ra1 i thought generals was way better than them I better play duke nukem 3d i only ever played duke nukem 1 and 2 i agree about relentless and twinsens odyssey were good i want the third one that hasnt been made.

what about the first one relentless did you play that as well?

ok, its fine now

i was looking at the time at the bottom of the page and noticed it was an hour out, and was wondering are there any setting for day light savings?

i found that to connect to my nt4domain i need net logon

you pwned but the first one was better

LBA, really someone else has heard of it?

try free some ram instead of buying 2 new gpus

is there a setting for mouse sensetivity there as well?

onboard is okish sometimes. for example an intel onboard with 64MB RAM is better than an Nvidia TNT2 M64 32MB at playing ut2004

i have to agree qemu is too slow

im wondering what you are talking about when you say only 256MB RAM?

winimp isnt there http://www.technelysium.com.au/winimp.html http://cdn.simtel.net/pub/simtelnet/win95/...ss/wnimp121.exe

at home when im using nt4\2k\xp i use administrator i just cant be bothered using the user acount even when i have 9x logging on to my domain i use my "administrator" (administrator has no policies applied to it the other users do) at school i use a domain administrator most the time as well.

p3 600, what was it like and how much ram

Computer crash = Never. BSOD = Occasionally but i use 98se, and when the screen saver comes on. Freeze Up = it used to for most directx games untill i changed mobos because the old mobo had dodgy caps Windows fails to load = i put in some dodgy files Restart after Windows update to have: Missing operating system...? = I tried to install ubuntu lite Program Crash = Only when i use bad software