
NotHereToPlayGames
MemberContent Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by NotHereToPlayGames
-
You'll just have to witness it yourself. The WinPenPack prevents (ie, "redirects") those registry entries. But you do have to be "smart enough" to edit the .INI file (and "smart enough" to delete any registry entries already present). I trust that you (smart enough, that is).
-
We're TALKING IN CIRCLES. I've already mentioned that I do NOT use "installers".
-
Thorium
NotHereToPlayGames replied to mockingbird's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Definitely NOT me! I disable "HW Acceleration" on all of my HWA-capable computers. -
Thorium
NotHereToPlayGames replied to mockingbird's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Agreed! Same here. Single-core CPU, XP x86, IBM ThinkPad T42. This T42 is on its "last leg", I only keep it around to tune aftermarket turbo's and hex-edit Engine Control Modules. I am in-process of migrating all of my engine tuning software to something else - because one of these days, it is SUPERMIUM that is going to outright KILL this laptop! -
Thorium
NotHereToPlayGames replied to mockingbird's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
I'll hit "run again", walk to fast food down the road, and see if a second run improves. Scratch that. Computer locked up at 100% and I had to unplug the d@mn thing to reboot! Supermium really really REALY hates single-core computers! -
Thorium
NotHereToPlayGames replied to mockingbird's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
XP single-core - 360Chrome [86] == 23.04 seconds Chrome 92 == 15.92 seconds Chrome 108 == 26.52 seconds Thorium == 18.02 seconds Supermium == appeared to lock up at 3.24 seconds, waited anyway, appeared to lock up at 80.99 seconds, waited some more, still waiting, still waiting, 381.74 seconds Granted, I may be behind a version on both my Thorium and my Supermium. And the author of Supermium does explicitly advise not to run on single-core (but this is supposed to be for OLD computers, so I'm running on an OLD computer). -
Thorium
NotHereToPlayGames replied to mockingbird's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Is that FOUR point eighty? Or NINE point eighty? That font is TERRIBLE. -
Thorium
NotHereToPlayGames replied to mockingbird's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Disabled GPU rasterization: -
Thorium
NotHereToPlayGames replied to mockingbird's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Default GPU rasterization: -
Can you name such an extension? I use the "X-Chromium" WinPenPack loader and I've never witnessed any extensions writing to the registry. From here: https://www.portablefreeware.com/?id=2169 Then replace the "bin" folder with any Chrome-based browser you want to make portable.
-
Thorium
NotHereToPlayGames replied to mockingbird's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
-
Thorium
NotHereToPlayGames replied to mockingbird's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
All I can tell you for 1,234,567.89% is that none of my Chrome-based browsers make any permanent registry writes and none of them store data "outside" of the PORTABLE LOADER'S "bin" "user" folder. -
Thorium
NotHereToPlayGames replied to mockingbird's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
True. I've *never* "installed" any web browser in over 20 years! Too much CRAP used to be "bundled" with browsers so I stopped "trusting" installers a LONG time ago. -
Thorium
NotHereToPlayGames replied to mockingbird's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Not if you use a "loader" such as WinPenPack or X-Chrome or PAF, they all work for Supermium and Thorium to make them portable with zero registry-writes and fully self-contained folder structures. -
Thorium
NotHereToPlayGames replied to mockingbird's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
No installer is needed for Supermium as a portable. Any Chrome "loader" will work and the "installer" can be extracted with dozens of different extractors. Just because it's an "exe", that doesn't mean you have to "execute" it, lol. -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
NotHereToPlayGames replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Hint - don't use the forum search feature In google or bing, just include site:msfn.org as part of your search, I assume "all" search engines allow that, these are the only two I use and I know it works for both of them -
AdBlock -- best ad blocker ::: version 5.22.0 One list and one list ONLY -- Anti-Circumvention filters -- UPDATED DAILY, not the abandoned uBO anti-circumvention filter list Been the ONLY way to prevent YouTube ads at work (the only place I use YouTube to begin with ) Auto Maximize Tab ::: version 1.1.0 To maintain a drag-and-drop feature of 360Chrome when a tab is dragged to a different monitor (all of my computers have from 3 to 5 monitors) Autofill ::: version 11.5.1 I don't like memorizing passwords or usernames or even phone numbers or addresses and built-in browser feature doesn't always work, this ALWAYS works CRX Extractor/Downloader ::: version 1.5.7 I use UNGOOGLED and DO NOT WANT the "Chrome Web Store" to work in any way, shape, or form on my computer I also NEVER use extensions "as-is", I modify them to run the way I want them to run Enhancer for YouTube ::: version 2.0.123 Works great for my needs but you will need a MODERN browser to use this Extension List ::: version 1.0.2.0 To turn extensions off and on with a toggle switch with two mouse-clicks instead of jumping through way too many browser hoops and menus H5EQ ::: version 0.0.2 10-band equalizer so that audio doesn't sound like it's coming from a speaker manufactured by a 5yr old in a 3rd world country Speed Dial ::: version 3.0.0.1 I have zero use for a "bookmark bar" or even a "bookmark menu", all my favorites are accessed via icon-based grid I also intentionally limit my number of bookmarks, most of my websites aren't accessed via a "bookmark" but by Proxomitron "URL aliases" Stylus ::: version 1.5.15 We all know Stylus 6 userscript "primaries" here at work, my "primary" styles all have anywhere from 2 to 21 actual URLs that they effect Four times that or so at home Tampermonkey ::: version 4.13 We all know Tampermonkey 18 userscripts here at work, twice that or so at home uBlock Origin ::: version 1.26.2 We all know uBO Only five lists, Proxomitron is my primary filter workhorse Ungoogled Chromium v114 Win10 Enterprise 22H2 here at work Win10 LTSB 2016 at home
-
Easy. By taking some personal responsibility and knowing if you downloaded from an OFFICIAL source or if you just clicked some random link that some random person on some random web site directed you to. Doesn't sound very complicated to me. We used to call it "net savvy". And it is the "net savvy" consumer that has NEVER been hit with malware yet also NEVER runs real-time "protection". We used to also call it "practice safe hex".
-
MyPal 68
NotHereToPlayGames replied to Jody Thornton's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Although, I also just saw this. So clearly nothing to do with MyPal 68. -
MyPal 68
NotHereToPlayGames replied to Jody Thornton's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
I thought the same thing! I am not a "gamer" so I pretty much basically assumed it to be an ONLINE GAME accessed via WEB BROWSER (ie, MyPal 68 in this case). -
I do the same thing. In my case, the "side list" will change depedent on my browser window size.
- 123 replies
-
- YouTube
- youtube-dl
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Thorium
NotHereToPlayGames replied to mockingbird's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
I have in 360Chrome. But *ONLY* if I listened to "other members" here at MSFN and "removed" the VULKAN files. I never experienced that issue once I stopped "listening" and *KEPT* the VULKAN files. Though in my experience, there were TWO SETS of Vulkan files, one in the root dir and another in a sub-folder. I only needed to keep ONE set (the sub-folder). That said, I have no freaking clue what "Vulkan" is - but I know for a fact that MY SYSTEM REQUIRES these files !!!