NotHereToPlayGames

I like Thorium also. I've had good success with it on my two remaining XP machines. My XP machines really hate UXP-based browsers (Serpent 52 and New Moon 28) for some reason. Major memory leaks. Very slow and sluggish. Too many unresolved bugs that keep piling up on top of each other. Not enough WEEKLY bug testers so a bug isn't found for SEVERAL MONTHS and nobody can pin down precisely when the bug first appeared.

Oh... I recall at least as high as 13.5.2044. Probably even "newer". So a 13.5.1039 does exist. Our corporate IT department was always blind to all of my builds as far as telemetry traffic. Something exists in 2044 that flagged IT. I didn't bother to isolate the specifics as I prefer 1030.

Here, I'll fix it for you... US entities must comply with US (rather than Russian, Canadian, or Sharia) law. Simply how US law works. waka waka waka

I'll have to try the imgur from home. I no longer keep 360Chrome here at work. As for 13.5.1039, I'm not familiar with it. I use 13.5.1030. There are "newer" versions but in the case of 360Chrome with the v86 Chrome engine, "newer is simply not better", stick with the OLDER.

Can I get an exact imgur link? Everything I've visited to try to track down your issue doesn't even have the same .js files you cited in your log.

Your problem is this line -- .split(...).at is not a function

All true. Though I myself wouldn't label the developer a "current" member - when has he last logged in? edit - I see he logged in four days ago, so yeah, that is "current" - but I see no posts from him in this thread. I suspect he PMs more than he posts.

But I also reiterate - it really is my opinion that Microsoft should just IGNORE such a TINY userbase. Why spend "thousands" in resources just to hunt down a small handful of users and "shut 'em down" when that userbase really poses NOTHING to the "bottom line"?

It kind of doesn't work that way. GitHub is located in the USA. GitHub cannot host content that violates USA Law. Is there a GitHub-like platform in Canada or Australia? If so, solution sounds pretty simple to me, move it to that platform. I know I'm a simple mind, but it really does sound that simple to me.

But I guess at the same time, I have to also look at the CROWDSTRIKE issue that took out the airline industry a week or so ago. Some blame MICROSOFT for that instead of CROWDSTRIKE. So MICROSOFT does have to "defend" its code if an attack even on MODIFIED CODE by "third paries" affects MICROSOFT'S "reputation".

Not to be misread, though I am aware of how "easily" a comment like that can be MISREAD. Personally, I feel that Microsoft (albeit the owner of the Operating System being "extended") should basically turn a blind eye and ADMIT that the userbase of such "extensions" is so TINY that said userbase DOES NOT cut into their "bottom line".

Sending an official letter and receiving the official letter are two different things. I have never been a fan of "extended kernels" but do acknowledge that there is a "communal need" for them. To me, even POSReady2009 is a "leaked" entity being ILLEGALLY used by "thousands". I myself would never provide GitHub with a "real" email address if I were publishing "extended kernels" of a Microsoft Operating System on a Microsoft-owned web site. I'd be better served customizing a shirt with a bullseye symbol and walking around with a picket sign to offend anybody and everybody that would see me carrying the picket sign.

What version are you using? Perhaps you are using a version that does not have all of the telemetry removed? A screencap of what you are seeing would help us assist you.

WinXP + Chrome requires some jumping through hoops in order to "green padlock" ELLIPTIC CURVE certificate algorithm. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33922231/why-cant-windows-xp-handle-newer-ssl-certificate-versions

That web site has the most gigantic of header sections I think I've ever witnessed!

Another possibility is that username and password "input box codes" often contain "special instructions" embedded within their coding. That "special coding" apparently is either being altered or not listened to by one or both of your browser &/or proxy.

I haven't used ProxHTTPSProxy in quite some time. It is possible that it is CACHEING your cookies. Close and relaunch ProxHTTPSProxy to clear its CACHE.

Also, not all proxies will pass through all URL "anchors". ie, does the site you are seeing this with have a # in the URL?

I'd have to see the cookie contents to fathom a guess. I suspect it is possible that if you log in WITH a proxy, then you only stay logged in WITH a proxy. ie, there is something contained inside the cookie to know that you were routed through a proxy.

That's an ungoogled PLUS for me.

Technically, I wouldn't classify Win11 as a "new OS". It's just a rebranded Win10.

"last"

Same here. But the Chrome Web Store is only one aspect that requires ungoogling. Chrome recent versions have built-in WebRTC functions (ie, special treatment for Google IP Addresses) that must also be mitigated. There is always something that Google keeps adding to Chrome. I've found it too tiresome to even try to keep up! Ungoogled Chromium is a large team effort and they are quite good at keeping up.

I ran the "portable" version ( centbrowser_5.1.1130.129_x64_portable ) long enough to run some speed comparisons. It is fast! But it is NOT "portable" unless you use a different loader. Their "portable" version only moves the profile location, it doesn't localize registry writes. Like many other Chromium Forks, it is also unfortunate that it doesn't offer an ungoogled version. I really dislike the always-running "hosted app" (Chrome Web Store).

It does not bother me at all either. Just doing my part to keep the forum clean. Please do not make assumptions, there is no contrast here.