vinifera

hmm isn't *897 a patch, and not *892 ?

and what happens when drive is full ? nowhere to copy files ? i'm bit too skeptic about all that method... granted its obviously meant for high speed SSD's, otherwise constant duplication would hog OS down

dunno when M$ started with ribbon in explorer but did anyone tried to copy over a win 8 beta (think its build 78xx in question) and hex change the version to 10 ?

bit curious why nobody is commenting on how ReFS is good for drive itself (hardware) self-healing to me just tells me constant backup or some sort of check is in place which translates in constant read-write data, to which disk based drives might have slow performance and high possibility for sector corruption and SSD's as they are dying after XX read/write actions any thoughts ? i kinda doubt FS itself dumps things into RAM to spare drives themself....

I'm so lost hahaha just my 1 cent - its support ended OFFICIALLY in 2014 ----> END - THE END - just because (f*** do i have to repeat myself...) wepos 09 is done on same "codebase", and XP accepts its patches DOES NOT mean that this is extended support for XP, it is a WEPOS support, and as for legality-wise that is how it is presented - the latest "patch" for SMB also doesn't mean extended support, go read why it was released - if anything both MS and DEV's are abandoning (killing) XP support on purpose, s*** even OEM's

what the hell... 1. its for personal use..., any modified OS is... 2. XP's support ENDED in 2014 (and NO, WEPOS doesn't make it extended)

micro XP ISO is 99 MB yet fully functional

last normal forum

tried in control panel advanced settings of it ? they offer manual/new indexing locations, maybe it needs a "push" to start

their naming is ultra retarded a Fall Creators update ? (wasn't there already some stupid creators update ???) a Anniversary ???? whats next, an engagement or wedding ? maybe "Class of 14" ?

mmm swede chicks are beautiful

I hope mods won't transferr this post to modding section I am aware of various win7 tweaking ... I did it myself ... BUT, my question is, is anyone aware of lets call it such version of win7 that runs fluently on Athlon XP CPU's and its equivalents I know that regarding single core CPU's only Intel with 3 GHz+ was able to run NT 6 without lag but I always wonder what is such thing that causes it... I mean, my Athlon XP unfortunately can run only win xp, but in therms of speed it is 2.6 GHz, yet it lags ... so there you have it, a question above, or is it really hardware limitation ?

nice Noel, at least now I know any interest is gone just like hope in better NT ...

do these ... well i'll call them service packs hahaha even bring something to winblows 10 ? (not trolling)

at least on android you can find and use older versions

to me Linux "dropped the ball" the whole community or whatever it can be called had time since Vista to make at least 2 distros that are "dumb user-friendly" and for gaming winblows 8 just added fuel to the fire, but I don't see anything there, except thousands of distros

put android in it

so ? you just bring back modified one its not like they update that dll often, if at all

event viewer under admin tools

log file is important this way you can't know anything

well they both suck (8 and 10) 10 is just evolution of 8 there's nothing apealing in 8 either

wait, did you port DWM to XP and it works ?

err wasn't 8.1 released to "improve" 8.0 ?

Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\services\LanmanServer\Parameters] "SMB1"=dword:00000000 sc.exe config lanmanworkstation depend= bowser/mrxsmb20/nsi sc.exe config mrxsmb10 start= disabled google for powershell, i don't have it so don't use it

neither my win7 had it on list, but it has disable it via registry, cmd and power shell